Commons talk:Photographs of identifiable people/Update 2013/Other image sources

• Click on the 'Project page' tab, above to see the current policy/guideline wording that is under discussion on this page.
• To make a specific proposal, please start a new subsection and use the code below to put it in its own box. You can sign underneath the resultant box, but for technical reasons you can't use "~~~~" within it. Please number your proposal for ease of reference.

{{divbox|amber|Proposal number and title|Introduction
*text
*more text}}

Scope Review 2013 links:

Discuss stage 2 of this review

Translation

• Help your community by translating the review

Background

• Main review page: Background and process
• FAQ

Links to current rules

• Project Scope
• Photographs of identifiable people

Discussion: Introductory Scope wording

• Aim of Wikimedia Commons
• Excluded educational content

Discussion: Files

• Must be a media file
• Must be an allowable free file format
• Must be freely licensed or public domain

• Licensing terms
• Evidence
• Precautionary principle

• 'Realistically useful for an educational purpose'
• PDF and DjVu formats

Discussion: Pages, galleries and categories

• General pages, galleries and categories
• User pages, galleries and categories

Discussion: Areas of particular concern

• Censorship
• "Neutral point of view"

Discussion: Identifiable people

• Lead
• Legal issues
• Consent
• Moral issues
• Identification
• Examples
• Removal requests
• Other image sources

Other proposals

• Other proposals

Proposal 1

• Please discuss the above proposal here

This topic appears to be of lesser interest/priority to the community than some of the others in this review, and I propose that we should close it down now. That will allow us in part 2 of the review to focus our full attention on the most important and/or contentious issues. Please comment at Commons talk:Project scope/Update 2013/Stage 2. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)