Commons:Valued image candidates/Sari.jpg

Sari.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Yann (talk) on 2009-05-28 21:35 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saris
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Best image of the scope showing the whole dress. -- Yann (talk)
Review (criteria)	Request It should have some geo-information. Lycaon (talk) 23:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC) I think the geo-information is irrelevant to the subject. It was in a garden, but it could be in a studio. Yann (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment Apart from the sky being overexposed, it is probably the best illustration in its category. I will support when above requirement is addressed. Lycaon (talk) 23:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC) I don't think the sky can be corrected, but I don't see what it would add to the scope. A part of the sky can be cropped. Yann (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC) I made another try: File:Sari 2.jpg. Certainly not perfect, but the white sky feel is not there. If you have a better suggestion, I would like to know it. Yann (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC) More photos with a different sari. Which one(s) do you think valuable? Yann (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1 2 3  Comment They are really all fit for a VI, it will be difficult too choose actually (even the original one was, the overexposure of the sky was a minor issue). My bone of contention was the geolocation. Rules saya that there should be information on geolocation. It is always relevant unless a specific reason is given why it is not. E.g. when it is a studio picture, the description should say something like "Geo-location not applicable as the photo was take in the lab, or when it is a privacy issue, just give the town or the country, etc. In this case it concerns a national Asian dress but it looks as if the picture was taken in Europe, so IMO this should be somehow clarified. Lycaon (talk) 06:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Yes, all the pictures were taken in Europe, but most importantly, the model specially dressed for the pictures, and posed. I don't know how I should express that. Yann (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)  Comment Concerning geo-location, these images fall within what I would call non-place related shots, and I would not necessarily expect a geolocation for these images. --Slaunger (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)  Comment Could you please suggest something? Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Yes, sure: this or this. Lycaon (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Done. Sorry, I didn't understand that this should be added in the description. Yann (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Great, thanks. Maybe I was not clear enough. The only thing that rests is to pick the best of the bunch now. File:Sari 2.jpg and File:Blue sari 2.jpg are my favourites. Lycaon (talk) 19:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC) I've created a MVR for these. Yann (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Sari.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Sari 2.jpg: +1 3. Blue sari 2.jpg: 0 => File:Sari.jpg: Undecided. <-- File:Sari 2.jpg: Promoted. File:Blue sari 2.jpg: Undecided. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)