Commons:Valued image candidates/Panorama of Chilancho.jpg

Panorama of Chilancho.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2018-10-22 06:45 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Fisheye view of Chilancho
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Chilancho, at Kirtipur (Estd. in 1515 AD by Jagatpal Varma). -- Nirmal Dulal (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment The category is plethoric, it would be good to cut it into several categories. The image is tilted it could be straightened. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)  Done - Corrected. Thanks ! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC) The scope should be restricted to this monument. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)  Done - I corrected the scope. Thanks! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)  Comment - If this is the only photo on Commons of Chilancho, then of course it's best in scope. I assume you checked and made sure it was the only one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC) There are some more of it by me and two other Nepali Wikipedian.But I think this is a picture of an Historical Monument which is built in 1515 AD. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC) ---- Scope changed from Cultural heritage monuments in Nepal to Chilancho --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support> I changed the outline of the image. It's good for me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)  Comment - Nirmal Dulal, please make sure all pictures of this monument are visible in the gallery for the category. It's important for us to see every image of this monument and judge which one seems best in scope to us. I would of course respect your judgment on which of your own photos is best, but I should still be able to see them all and make my own judgment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)  Done I did my best. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC) Thank you, much appreciated. Yes, this seems to be the most useful photo, because it shows an overview. However, it has that curvy distortion. It's probably best to indicate what type of projection (fisheye?) was used in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC) Ikan Kekek is right the distorted image does not give an accurate idea of the building, they are useful and the term fisheye should be sytematic for this type of image.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC) it’s not taken with “fisheye”, its a panoramic shot taken with IPhone. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC) I have an Android, not an IPhone, so I ask you: When you set an IPhone to "panorama", does it automatically create a curve where one isn't there in real life? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC) I think yes. Does android took straight shots on panoramic mood??- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 12:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC) I think so, but I haven't tried that mode much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC) The term “fisheye” is very suitable whatever the technique. You have to change the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC) ---- Scope changed from Chilancho to Fisheye view of Chilancho -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:55, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support this time no problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2018 (UTC)  Support as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)