Commons:Valued image candidates/Das Tapfere Schneiderlein, Erika Maria Wiegand, 2006 07.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Das Tapfere Schneiderlein, Erika Maria Wiegand, 2006 07.jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by C.Suthorn (talk) on 2017-12-28 17:41 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Das Tapfere Schneiderlein (sculpture by Erika Maria Wiegand)
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
  • @C.Suthorn: Since changing the categorization broke the scope, I've gone ahead and changed that as well. Hope that's OK for you – please feel free to adjust! --El Grafo (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Question I was under the impression, that catagories can, like articles and files, be moved to another name. Therefore I do not understand, why a new category has been created, if all that was needed was to move the existing one?? --C.Suthorn (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's because I wanted to keep the old one as a redirect to Category:The Valiant Little Tailor. That way, if someone searches for the german/original title, they'll be able to find the main category easily. Also, if you move a category, you still have to also move its contents from the old to the new, so there's not much gained from using the "move" button. In fact, I've hardly ever seen anyone actually moving a category.
Another (optional) thing I just noticed: For VI's of sculptures I'd really prefer {{Art Photo}} being used instead of the regular {{Information}}. You might want to add {{FOP-Germany}} as well (can be put into the "artwork license" field of {{Art Photo}}). --El Grafo (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The files have to be moved in either case. But here I am the creator of the original category and get notified on changes to this category, which makes sense, as all files in the category are (for now) by me, and it is therefore reasonable, if I monitor that category. With the new category, this is not the case, I can only add it to my watchlist. I like to hear, if others also think Image #1 is better, than I would nominate that instead. --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Aah, I think I see your point now. Sorry about that, I'll try to keep that in mind in the future. --El Grafo (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]