Comment This is also what VI is about; taking the time to photograph everyday (boring) objects, which we take for granted, and which would never gain FP status due to lack of wow. I think the scope is relevant and it is an excellent illustration thereof. I am inclined to think, though, that the scope should be adjusted to DB13W3 (which is also the name of the en article the image appears in), as this seems to be the full, official name for this connector. I am not terribly knowledgeable of the subject though, so if it can be argued that 13W3 is a more commonly accepted name, I can accept that as well. --Slaunger (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
