Commons:Requests for rights/Denied/Autopatrolled/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ruyaba

[edit]
10 months ago when I had just created my account I uploaded 3 images downloaded from internet or captured from TV screen. At that time I was not familiar with the policies. Since then I have uploaded many pictures. I think my uploads don't need to be patrolled by others. I have autopatrolled right in English Wikipedia. Thank you. Binod Basnet (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I changed the heading and links to match the actual state of Wikimedia databases. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done Premature. Autopatrol on other projects really does not mean anything here as this project has a very different scope from encyclopedia based projects. With less than 500 edits here and other issues brought up above there is not enough to grant you this right at this time. --Majora (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KaiKemmann

[edit]
I would like to request the upload_by_url right. I take many pictures of architecture, historic places, monuments, landscape and nature which are automativally uploaded from my smart phone to GooglePhotos, Dropbox and mostly to the iCloud. Obviously it is a pain to upload photos directly from the smartphone, having to enter all descriptions with my thumb on the tiny screen keyboard. Also I don't want to use my limited bandwidth and hard disk capacity to download all photos from the cloud to the desktop pc (which is also broken at the moment) in order to be able to re-upload them all to Commons. With the upload-by-url function I am hoping to be able to upload directly from cloud storage. Is that correct? Best regards and thank you. KaiKemmann (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@KaiKemmann: Unfortunately, that is not correct. Extended-uploader right would be useful only for a limited white-listed websites: Commons:Upload tools/wgCopyUploadsDomains. It cannot upload files from GooglePhotos, Dropbox, or iCloud. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment, 4nn1l2.
I did now request that some major online storage providers be added to the whitelist (the request link sent me to phabricator ...).
Let's see how that goes.
--KaiKemmann (talk) 00:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request moved from extended uploader section due to discontinuation and imminent merging of that right with the (auto)patrolled groups. --Majora (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The request to add cloud storage provides to the whitelist has been put on hold. I've subscribed to the ticket on phabricator so I'll know if that changes. As of right now the main purpose for this request is stalled so I'm going to go ahead and close this as not done. If and when something changes we can take this back up again. --Majora (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EggOfReason

[edit]
This user: has been making good edits; is Extendedconfirmed, Rollbacker, and Journeyman Editor at enwiki; and is experiencing problems with trying to import using the new ImportFile tool due to Special:AbuseFilter/4 per Commons talk:Abuse filter#Report by EggOfReason Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a bug with the file import tool EggOfReason, Jeff G.. It is triggering a filter that I don't see why it should be triggering and seeing as EggOfReason imported other files right after that one I'm not sure what granting them this right will actually do since I'm guessing it is a bug behind it. Perhaps this should be reported to whomever is maintaining that tool? In any case, filter 4 only affects people with less than 200 edits so granting rights just to avoid it would be moot in 61 edits anyways. --Majora (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Majora: Thank you. @EggOfReason: Please reproduce the problem and follow mw:How to report a bug.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna go ahead and mark this as  Not done then. Seeing as this appears to be a bug with the file importer tool and therefore should be handled with the development team. Not by granting additional rights. If there are additional issues that cannot be resolved via that process let me know and I'll see what I can do rights wise. --Majora (talk) 03:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

الرشيد

[edit]
I would like to be Autopatrol; because I uploads pictures always. also, I have learend recently a lot about commons and its laws Thank you. الرشيد (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No --Didym (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But the file has been deleted. --الرشيد (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@الرشيد: You uploaded File:غلاف ديوان الزنابق.jpg 16:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC). MifterBot noticed that you had done so without a license 6 minutes after upload and posted to your user talk page about that. @Ies noticed that you had done so without proper licensing for that file and two others 14 minutes after upload and posted to your user talk page about that and tagged the files. @1989 deleted that file 16 minutes after upload due to "Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)". You then proceeded to antisocially sweep those posts under the carpet by removing them from your user talk page instead of archiving them, as you had done before. None of your action described above inspire trust.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Thank you, I will do my best to get your trust in future. الرشيد (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@الرشيد: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

الرشيد

[edit]
My previous request was denied as I had less than 500 edits, now I have more than 500 edits. So, I would like to be Autopatrol; because I upload pictures always. also, I have learend recently a lot about commons and its laws. Pleas grant me the chance. Thank you. الرشيد (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
give me an example, please! But don't come with an edit done before 6 months!الرشيد (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1 and 2.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:32, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, You can give an example about a dozen of edits ...--الرشيد (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I wrote "half a dozen", meaning about 6.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done These edits are problematic: Special:Diff/344996801, Special:Diff/344846749. Please also not that per COM:LP, category names should generally be in English.
This is your third declined request for autopatrol right on Commons in 2019. Please do not make another request for at least 3 months. Autopatrol right is not necessary for making contributions to Commons. Thanks. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:59, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

الرشيد

[edit]
I would like to be Autopatrol; because I upload pictures always. also, I have learend recently a lot about commons and its laws. Pleas grant me the chance Thank you. الرشيد (talk) 07:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, sorry but you have less than 500 edits. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 07:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Dyolf77 , So If I have 500 edits, can I get the right ? Thank you.
That is wrong, you deleted a category used on commons, If it is useful please delete it! Another thing where is the war in At Turra Category?! At Turra is in Jordan, and you delete the category certains that. Don't make yourself right while you are totally wrong!الرشيد (talk) 08:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mayawagon

[edit]
I am working with the Maori Language Commission to help them upload word pronunciation files, and they only have them in mp3 format. I will need permission to upload mp3s. Thank you. Mayawagon (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Briǵandeira

[edit]
I just want to upload some phonetics to my language wikipedia. Some more for pronunciation (so the various dialects are represented since they are accepted by the ruling organism of my language) and also, I would love to rearrange the phonetic audiofiles examples with actual phonetics of my language on the different languages my language phonetics exists, since at the moment it is used phonetic audiofiles that aren't galician, but spanish. Could you please grant me the right to add those mp3 files? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Briǵandeira (talk • contribs)
Comment This right is not granted to brand new users.  samee  .com  20:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Asking for this right was your first edit here out of four total edits globally. We do not grant this right to new users as stated above. Feel free to upload audio files in one of the other acceptable formats until it can be shown that you understand our policies well enough for this flag. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atdt

[edit]
Excellent user, charming and handsome. atdt (talk) 02:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is my edit-count a substantive issue, or are you punishing me for my sinful humor? The guidelines specify that an edit-count of 500 is usually required. I made my first edit here 13 years ago and have never ceased being active, while contributing at my own pace. I'd appreciate it if you re-considered. I understand the license policy, and I am requesting the right so I can use UploadWizard to upload appropriately-licensed images from flickr. atdt (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Atdt: 4 edits in 2018 and 12 edits in 2017 aren't counted as active. Is it? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
253 edits are not enoug. Therefore this is  Not done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Enivak

[edit]
I want to upload some MP3 files according to guidelines, and other similar. Thank you very much. Enivak (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose You don't have many edits. The requirement to be autopatrolled is more than 500 non bot like edits and 30 days active simultaneously. It can also be given if you make numerous good edits that have no requirement to be patrolled. --VKras (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose per VKras. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done This right is not granted to new users. Please upload media files in otherwise acceptable formats for now until you can show that you understand copyright laws and our policies here. Once you can show that feel free to come back and ask again. --Majora (talk) 20:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. Enivak (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Galib Hasan

[edit]
I have 11000+ Edits in commons as well as auto confirmed rights. This right will be helpful for me. Thank you. Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No. Also blocked a week just a month ago. --Didym (talk) 23:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jürgen Eissink

[edit]
Suggested by patroller Donald Trung. I wouldn't mind becoming a patroller straight away. Thank you. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]
 Not done as autopatrolled is part of patroller rights. Jianhui67 T★C 18:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuraily Lic

[edit]
Good contributions, user can be trusted Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 07:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per above. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN RAJU

[edit]
I am an editor on Commons since 2015.I have uploaded 9000 more images.Now,I would like autopatrolled rights. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done technical issue: You are a patroller, so the right is redundant with autopatroller Ezarateesteban 20:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Defender

[edit]
Fights vandalism. Thank you. (I'm checking some global renamers who don't have autopatrol) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Very low experience on Commons. Masum Reza📞 07:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masumrezarock100: It's true he doesn't have any uploads or anything like that, but the question is: does Defender need to be patrolled? Users without (constructive) edits need to be patrolled, they could be vandals. New users need to be patrolled, they could accidentally break things. Defender seems to be interested only in fighting vandalism and renaming, and is doing that very well. But I see your point. What if Defender decided to start uploading at some point and uploaded problematic files? Though that seems somewhat hypothetical to me. But I'll leave it to the admins. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I see no harm in giving a steward the autopatrolled. With regards to the concern addressed by Alexis Jazz about uploads, Defender's edits will still pop up in new user's list such as User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users until his edit count hits 150 (might take a while to hit as he only has 44 edits in the last 3 years). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:06, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, I should have done my homework. Stewards are very experienced users, and they were elected by the community. They can be trusted with this right as I think they would never abuse it. But I am not convinced why they would need this right when they are a steward. I mean they could grant it to themselves if they wanted. Masum Reza📞 20:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masumrezarock100: Defender doesn't need it personally, but their edits won't have to be patrolled by patrollers anymore when they are autopatrolled. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not needed. Stewards have by default autopatrol (globally). Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tulsi Bhagat: I thought that was just on meta, but Special:GlobalGroupPermissions/steward says the same. Guess Defender already has the autopatrolled flag in that case. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scann

[edit]
I uploaded a bunch of images to Commons with my previous account Scanno and I want to use Visual File Change to modify categories and templates, and improve the metadata. I'm planning to add more files. Thank you. Scann (talk) 22:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Scann: You can install VFC manually and use it without autopatrol. Masum Reza📞 07:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done not consensus to grant the flag, invalid reasons to request it Ezarateesteban 12:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CalalC99

[edit]
Hi, could you specify the reason for asking this right? Masum Reza📞 09:57, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Part of my worк is on Wiкimedia Commons. Every day I upload photos to Wiкimedia Commons. If I had this right, I would not just upload a photo or patrol it. If there is something missing in the files, I'll add them. I will fight against vandalism. If I get this right, my activities at Wiкimedia Commons will continue to grow. CalalC99 (talк) 10:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this one is a reasonable request. Judging by the warnings and messages on their talk page, they still have a long way to go in my opinion. An unfortunate  Oppose this time. @Candidate: I'd suggest waiting for a few months, and in the meantime try to make yourself familiar with our licensing polices (COM:FOP, COM:PD) and other things. Try to learn from your mistakes and from the messages on your talk page. Kind regards, Masum Reza📞 12:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I understood. Thank you for your advice. CalalC99 (talк) 13:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done no consensus to grant the flag Ezarateesteban 20:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jdforrester_(WMF)

[edit]
He makes edits to fulfill his role in WMF, using this staff account. But after reviewing recent contributions, I see a lot of good edits. I know we require an editor to have at least 500 Non-automated edits on Commons, but I do not feel their edits need to be patrolled. He also reverts test edits/vandalism, and rollback might be helpful. Thank you. Masum Reza📞 15:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masumrezarock100: You are a bit wrong.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I should have noticed that. That said, even though he has admin permissions for his volunteer account, edits they make by their staff account won't be autopatrolled without relevant permission. Masum Reza📞 16:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The sysadmin global group applies autopatrolled to all edits globally. No need for this. --Majora (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Den1980-

[edit]
Can be trusted. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eatchasock

[edit]
I'm test account of User:Eatcha, need this right to bypass API restrictions Thank you. Eatchasock (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Eatcha: please confirm the above. In a few days you'll be autoconfirmed, won't that be enough? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will be mainly using it for bot testing (Featured picture and video bot), I don't think I will make that much edits to become autoconfirmed. BTW how many day/edits are required ? AND Yes, I confirm that User:Eatchasock is my sockpuppet. -- Eatcha (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You really do not need to call your alternate account a sockpuppet (unless you plan to abuse it of course). That is the word we use for those accounts which has been abused. Masum Reza📞 12:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Eatcha: Should be 4 days with 10 edits for autoconfirmed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only 4 days. No edits are required on Commons. Ctrl+F: "wgAutoConfirmCount" at [1]. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I can wait for 4 days, it had a misconception that 50 edits are required. -- Eatcha (talk) 18:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just realised that I needed confirmed rights instead of autopatrol, only need to skip (skipcaptcha) autopatrol and autoconfirm sounds similar. -- Eatcha (talk) 18:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
50 edits are required to be auto-confirmed on Wikidata not here. Masum Reza📞 18:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kai3952

[edit]
Can be trusted. Their edits shows up in Special:NewPages backlog. I see no need to patrol their edits Thank you. Masum Reza📞 16:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See Commons:Requests for rights/Denied/Autopatrolled/2018#Kai3952. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Once again, they don't want it. If they want it they can apply for it themselves. --Majora (talk) 17:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here I thought we need to reduce the backlog of unpatrolled edits. I should have investigated further. Thanks 大诺史 for pointing that out. Masum Reza📞 17:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calvinkulit

[edit]
I've been using this wiki for months and I want to fight vandalism. I am also a possible candidate for autopatrolled. Thank you. Calvinkulit • t • c 09:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you do not need this right to fight vandalism. Just use the undo button, and scripts like Twinkle if you are tired of confirming every undo. Cheers, Masum Reza📞 10:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose: I'm sorry but your edits still need to be patrolled, I've seen you creating messes and participating in edit warring (Recently blocked on Meta for that) and as Masumrezarock100 said you don't need AP to fight vandalism. Possible candidate for autopatol? Well, Bots are bots. -- CptViraj (📧) 10:41, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I would not really oppose autopatrolled because of their indefinite block on 2 Wikimedia projects. Looks like they often need to be reverted. Lets see what their future edits will be before considering whether this user can be granted autopatrolled or not. I currently oppose autopatrolled because of their ongoing inappropriate actions. --VKras (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose your edits look suspicious to me, your edit trend is not very appealing + other reason that I get from your interaction. - Eatcha (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not granted per above - recent block history, rationale provided does not require AP. Edits still need to be patrolled at this point in time. ~riley (talk) 04:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Hijjawi

[edit]
I've been using Wikimedia commons for years and I know the policies and Licenses. I will be uploading large number of photos in the coming days and be effective in commons. --Mohammad Hijjawi (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Due to recent copyright violations. --VKras (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not seeing any recent DR notices/speedydelete notification template related to copyvio in their talk page history. And their recent uploads seems to be fine. I might be wrong though. Could you provide links to the recent copyvio images they uploaded? Masum Reza📞 12:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masumrezarock100 See their talk page. --VKras (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@VKras: I am the one who left those messages. But I still don't understand how they are related to copyvio. Those SD notices are of gallery pages not files. Masum Reza📞 14:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ Masumrezarock100 Then, they are not copyright violations. --VKras (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were the one opposed them due to their "recent copyrignt violations". Am I missing something? Masum Reza📞 15:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ Masumrezarock100 Their current messages are not regarding copyright violations. --VKras (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then shouldn't you strike that comment? Masum Reza📞 15:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Don’t really support their request See their talk page. --VKras (talk) 15:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boothsift Thanks for crossing out my first oppose comment. It is a now a wrong one. --VKras (talk) 08:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@VKras: What's on my talk page is speedy deletions for two pages Which I created wrongly, I wanted to create two categories for Wikidata 2019 Con instead --Mohammad Hijjawi (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I pretty much figured that out by seeing how you created those gallery pages. IMO, those speedy deletion notices are not much of a concern, they were created by accident! That said, I am not going to vote here per reasons that I have already expressed in their request for file mover rights. Masum Reza📞 04:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also stop adding problematic captions. Would you?. Your name in the "author" field in the information template is sufficient. No need to add your name to the file titles and captions. They are for describing files. Masum Reza📞 06:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not granted - too many red flags at this time. Additionally, does not understand the purpose of COM:Captions - adding generic captions that match the file name (offering no further clarity) is not helpful, captions are to specify what is pictured. Pasting the file name into the caption field helps nobody. ~riley (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Killarnee

[edit]
Look at my posts, you will see a control is unnecessary. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•R•P) 00:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a Wikipedian since 2 years and stopped half a year ago. With another username. A few weeks ago I started again with the name Test919,733,084. I learned about commons in Wikipedia, but I did not upload pictures with my old account. And what do you mean by opinion, is this a test or should I say what could be improved? --Killarnee (T•R•P) 04:57, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we should assume good-faith and not interrogate too much for rights like "Autopatrol". Their contribution looks good, they have wikiskills per contibutions. It's only an opinion though. Thanks, -- Eatcha (talk) 05:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I was just trying to figure out whether or not you are a "new" user. I have seen plenty of sockmaster creating new accounts (who look liked newbies) and abuse them. The style of your editing, your userpage implies that you are not a "new user". A clean start is a good thing but the user should not have any active sanctions. If they do, it would be ban evading. While I do not see any issues with your editing, it is not hard to accidentally make mistakes. That's why I wanted to test you with that last question. I am guessing that you weren't active in Commons with your old accounts since you said you didn't upload any pictures to Commons. My suggestion would be to wait a while, make yourself familiar with Commons, explore around a bit. I am not comfortable with a newly created account having autopatrol since it does more than just "autopatroling" edits. I would not mind patrolling your edits by hand. That said, I am not an admin so I will leave it to a admin to make the decision. This is just a suggestion. :). Masum Reza📞 11:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I never had any problems with my old account, that's not it. And why I want Autopatrol is so that I can upload mp3. Otherwise, nobody does that. And you do not get that much more rights, so you do not need a lot of experience. --Killarnee (T•R•P) 12:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kyshtym3

[edit]
It seem no need to patrol. Catherine Laurence discussion 07:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn G. Parrish

[edit]
~ I am a real user, all publicly accessible on my User-Page. Thank you. Glenn G. Parrish (talk) 13:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_rights/Denied/Autopatrolled/2019&oldid=384580452"