Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nagendra NJ
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Nagendra NJ
[edit]- Nagendra NJ (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Sukkusakhi (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Shriiiya (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Vinodsinghgupta (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Rbt121323 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Daredi (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Sikkindarjaa (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Block evasion
[edit]- Current theega (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Contributorxxx (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Nenorakam (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected sleepers
[edit]- Vinodsinghgupta (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Shreyaz (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Chitti enaati (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Samarth143 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: These accounts were confirmed as sockpuppets of Nagendra NJ on enwiki (SPI). These all quack loudly and have uploaded several copyright violations, minus the sleepers (confirmed on enwiki). Could a CU check for other sleepers and block the underlying IP/IP range if and as needed. ~riley (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like a duck to me - all blocked. ~riley (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Inconclusive --Krd 09:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like a duck to me - all blocked. ~riley (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.