Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/D4rkeRR9
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
D4rkeRR9
[edit]- D4rkeRR9 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
confirmed related users
[edit]- NSR97 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) (already confirmed on en.wp)
- Mhd240 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) (already confirmed on en.wp)
Suspected related users
[edit]- محمد٢ (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: 1) The sockmaster (D4rkeRR9) was indefed on en.wp and the first two (NSR97 and Mhd240) have been confirmed there[1][2] as their block evading socks. 2) While محمد٢ (the account is new, the editor is obviously not) hasn't edited en.wp, their global contributions, especially on fr.wp (the sockmaster has a thing for the so-called "Sharifian empire" and the "list of wars involving Morocco"), are too similar to the sockmaster's to dismiss as pure coincidence. M.Bitton (talk) 22:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Declined: 1) D4rkeRR9 would be Stale, and x-wiki CU findings are valid for unified accounts, so no check would be needed for NSR97 and Mhd240; and 2) per COM:RFCU: "Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is." (underline in original). No evidence has been offered of disruption to the Commons. If محمد٢ is editing the Commons disruptively, evidence of that disruption, and that it is a continuation of disputation of other accounts, is needed. Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.