Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Calcineur
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Calcineur
[edit]- Calcineur (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- 213.221.7.251 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 141.105.65.70 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 193.252.49.53 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 113.28.42.81 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 180.245.238.183 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 109.69.7.146 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 201.251.5.248 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 200.214.72.248 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 78.114.206.189 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale
[edit]- Reason: These three accounts are making very similar edits putting forth a particular POV, see
- Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Calcineur_anti-corrida_POV-pushing
- User_talk:Jameslwoodward#Calcineur_now_continues_contributing_under_IP.
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Calcineur (talk · contribs) has been permanently banned from fr:WP and is targeting it using multiple sockpuppet accounts. See fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/Calcineur. Badzil (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Results
[edit]- Comment Ok - there are no other obvious puppet accounts here however quite a range of IPs are used and I'm not going fishing. In the end the contribs here are not bad generally so I have no reason to block from a CU perspective. Up to others to make that decision I think. --Herby talk thyme 16:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. OK except for
. This user is constantly POV-pushing and his contribs show it. Badzil (talk) 16:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)the contribs here are not bad generally
- Thanks. OK except for
- OK but that is not a CU matter - maybe an admin board is the better option? Apologies for not dealing with it more quickly though :( --Herby talk thyme 16:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problem This has already been dealt with the admin board and resulted in the blocking of most of these IPs. Badzil (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK but that is not a CU matter - maybe an admin board is the better option? Apologies for not dealing with it more quickly though :( --Herby talk thyme 16:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.