Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Biantez

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Biantez}} to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Biantez

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 07:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

• Biantez (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

• Lacareco (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: They are {{confirmed}} to be the same as per my CU investigation on Wikidata. Requesting a sleeper check and sanctions on Commons. Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 07:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

• Declined - CU data are valid across projects for SUL accounts, so there would be no useful purpose of a redundant Commons check. We cannot simply check for sleepers, as Checkuser is not for fishing, and no evidence has been provided here of disruption to the Commons (per COM:RFCU: "Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is" (underline in original)). Эlcobbola _talk 15:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.