Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Articlebaker1

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Articlebaker1}} to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Articlebaker1

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 22:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

• Articlebaker1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected related users

• ArticleBaker (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Adnanjavidkhan1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Akaybroda (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 2409:4054::/36 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 117.204.240.42 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 2409:4054:281:1661:61E0:C8AD:95AC:EB66 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log • checkuser)

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: Articlebaker1, ArticleBaker, Akaybroda is {{confirmed}} to be the same person according to the Wikidata CU case. Adnanjavidkhan1 is {{stale}} there, but not on enwiki, where they've been active, and the enwiki case is in progress. I've already created the category for them. CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

• Confirmed that Adnanjavidkhan1 = Articlebaker1. Others Declined as unnecessary; if confirmed on a sister project there is no need for a redundant check on the Commons. Going forward, please also follow COM:RFCU instructions which say "When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is." (underline in original) We do not comment on IPs. Эlcobbola _talk 22:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.