As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits, and to have been active in the last thirty days. Patrollers and License reviewers don't have to request this flag.
Your edits here look fine to me. (I've also added the overwriting template to that file) Could you explain in your own words the reasons why you were blocked from frwiki last year? Abzeronow (talk) 20:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I've noticed some river categories contain several different rivers sharing the same name. AWB would be a good tool to help me split them, and then do similar jobs more widely. I've used it for quite a while on en wikipedia. Thanks. --Northernhenge (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
been patrolling latest files and ended up wracking up quite the edit count and would like to do better patrolling and to start working deeper into the commons :3 I’ve worked pretty hard the last week and a half Thank you. Cyberwolf (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to request for template editor rights. I have been a template editor on the Vietnamese Wikipedia since late 2022 (and also an eliminator), and I have gained considerable experience in modifying templates as well as modules (see viwiki edits on templates, modules and my sandbox). On Commons, I have submitted multiple requests for adding translations to protected templates and MediaWiki interface messages. Therefore, I am requesting this right to assist in responding to edit requests, and partly because NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh has resigned earlier. Thank you. Phương Linh (talk) 14:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made at least 1,000 useful, non-botlike edits or a large amount of justified renaming requests at Commons before they will consider granting the filemover right.
Five requests from 2024 & five from 2025. All successful. Only concern is what @Jeff G. mentioned on their TP about behaviour & vandalism. Archives ain't there, can be found in history. Shaan SenguptaTalk11:12, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The more recent blanked messages with GPSLeo are slightly concerning to me as well. All of their rename requests have been Criteria 1. I'd like to see other rename requests using other criteria so that they can show they understand the file renaming guidelines. Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, per Abzeronow. Please apply again after some time with a good record of rename requests to demonstrate your understanding of the renaming policy. --Ratekreel (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]