As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits, and to have been active in the last thirty days. Patrollers and License reviewers don't have to request this flag.
@Kd289: I see a bunch of copyvios from April 2024. I'd like to hear from Kd289 about what steps they've taken or what lessons they've learned since then to prevent copyright issues. Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. User hasn't been active for longer than 30 days and did not answer my query. I'd be willing to reconsider when they become active again. Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In general, I'm mainly focused on translations, of which I've already done quite a few (which are correct - no need to patrol), and there's no problem with my files (the last time I was warned about it was 5 months ago). Thank you. BZPN (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since then I have gained more experience, and there are no problems with the files I have recently uploaded (correctly described, no doubts about copyright issues). The September 2024 copyvios were 5 months ago, so I had enough time to improve :). BZPN (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I am willing to temporarily grant the flag for 3 months. If there aren't any more copyright issues, just reapply here or on my talk page around when the temporary rights expire, and I'll make it permanent. Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, I upload to Commons reasonably often through my work on the English Wikipedia and expect to continue doing so in the future. I'd find it very useful to have access to the tools associated with this permission. I have read the guideline and understand the responsibility I would be taking on. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:17, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedurally Not done, @TechnoSquirrel69. As you can see via the top of the page: "As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits, and to have been active in the last thirty days. Patrollers and License reviewers don't have to request this flag."
You are an experienced and reliable editor but your edit count is lower than 500. After passing this criteria, ping me I will grant the rights. Best wishes. KadıMessage16:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kadı just telling you how I see it. 500 mark is just a rough guideline and not a necessity. There have been been numerous instances when users with less than 500 edits have been granted this right based on need, trust and experience. As far as TS69 is concerned, he is experienced and trusted. So I think denying it solely bcoz of less than 500 count should be re-considered. Thank you. Shaan SenguptaTalk18:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: @SVG flag maker: You have been declined multiple times, and asked to come later but you don't seem to learn. As such I will block you from editing this page for next three months. Demonstrate your experience in those three months and request after the block has expired. signed, Aafi (talk)10:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From time to time I correct the colors of “incorrectly” tinted coats of arms in the sense of heraldry according to FIAV etc. (for example, the unheraldic or incorrect color “gray” is replaced by the correct heraldic color “silver/white”). It would be nice if I could therefore permanently obtain the right to upload the correct color version of a coat of arms as a new version. Many thanks in advance for a potential extension of rights. Arthur Diebold (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am requesting access to this tool as I am planning to start diffusing categories of Indian politicians starting with Category:Rajnath Singh which has 799 files in the main category. A month ago I did this at Category:Raj Kumar Singh both manually and with Cat-a-lot. It took a lot of my time and AWB will make things easier. Thank you. Shaan SenguptaTalk14:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I've noticed some river categories contain several different rivers sharing the same name. AWB would be a good tool to help me split them, and then do similar jobs more widely. I've used it for quite a while on en wikipedia. Thanks. --Northernhenge (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have been a template editor at en: since January 2010 and a Filemover since June 2010, working primarily on BSicons here at Commons. I'm requesting the privilege because of the high visibility/protection level of some of the templates used by the project. Thank you. Useddenim (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made at least 1,000 useful, non-botlike edits or a large amount of justified renaming requests at Commons before they will consider granting the filemover right.
See also: Confirmed users. 
Not done for now. User hasn't been active for longer than 30 days and did not answer my query. I'd be willing to reconsider when they become active again. Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Done for three months. Abzeronow (talk) 19:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support has a clue, knows what they are doing, dark mode needs all the help it can get. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 08:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)