Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 30 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Southwest N963WN 2.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination I think the problem was I was so intent on getting the first oncoming shot right, when I turned it just wasn't focused quite right. Oh well, I do agree now, this isn't a QI of a plane. Thanks everyone, Sixflashphoto 20:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wadi_Al-Hitan_By_Hatem_Moushir_35.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Wadi Al-Hitan protected area --Hatem Moushir 02:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Very subtly posterized sky, but it looks more like a fine grain, and overall, this is a striking image of good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Are you sure about the quality? All these desert pics looks to me as if there is noise reduction overdone. --Berthold Werner 13:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm not that sure, because this was the only one that looked good to me, so I honestly began to doubt it. -- Ikan Kekek 07:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm fine with the sky but I also recognize the pattern of agressive noise reduction.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 17:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)