Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 29 2020

• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (U-boat. A German submarine).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laetiporus sulphureus. Location, Stuttebosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marks Haindorf Foundation (Am Kanonengraben 4) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gargoyles at the St. Lamberti Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bells of the Saint Vikor Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Column with Anabaptist sculptures at the historic town hall, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lazarus chapel at the St. Josef Church, Kinderhaus, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish and pilgrimage church "Our Lady of Mercy" in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of a roman relief with a hunting scene at the southern outside choir wall of the parish and pilgrimage church "Our Lady of Mercy" in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock at the bell tower of the parish and pilgrimage church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angels of Judgment, stone reliefs (created around 1300 A.D.) at the nave`s exterior south wall of the parish and pilgrimage church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abat-son at the bell tower of the parish and pilgrimage church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mausoleum in the Vittoriale degli Italiani in Salò. --Moroder 01:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One of the towers of the Abbaye de Cassan. --Christian Ferrer 20:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Great! --Mosbatho 20:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Canal de Sète and the Adolphe Merle wharf. --Christian Ferrer 20:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower - Pian dell'Isola Rignano sull'Arno. --PROPOLI87 19:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose resolution is close to minimum requerements and there is very low detail --Augustgeyler 00:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Episcopal Summer Palace in Bratislava in February 2018. --Mosbatho 19:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portugal, Alcobaça, Praça 25 de Abril --Berthold Werner 18:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Huebsch! Well done! --Mosbatho 19:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milestone on Brighton Road --Bobulous 16:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iomega Zip disk --Bobulous 16:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --ReneeWrites 23:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 and 11 West Street, Ewell --Bobulous 16:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --ReneeWrites 23:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Mühlhausen (Thuringia) (1921). --Palauenc05 15:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The likely last Pionierlandungsboot 41 landing craft of the German Military that was used in the Worl War II. --Mosbatho 15:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rainer Halama 18:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milepost at Moskovsky Prospekt in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 15:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sennaya Square in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 15:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Znamenka Manor in Saint Petersburg. Main Building --Florstein 15:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hawa Mahal (The Palace of Winds) in Jaipur --Jakubhal 14:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms of Kaisersesch on despatch rider fountain -- Spurzem 14:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Court coat of arms from 1554 on despatch rider fountain in Kaisersesch -- Spurzem 14:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lindisfarne Castle on Holy Island in England --Mdbeckwith 12:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wawel Sandomierz Tower. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 12:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ohrenstein tenement house. 42 Dietla Street/27 Stradomska Street. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 12:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timbered house from 1790 in the Hauptstraße 85 of Bad Bodendorf -- Spurzem 11:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Comment There's light chromatic aberration along the top of the roofs, and the edges of the building on the left. --ReneeWrites 11:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    @ReneeWrites: Okay, I withdraw. -- Spurzem 12:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
• 
  • Nomination Former restaurant “Zum Schwan” in Karden -- Spurzem 10:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of an ambulance jet at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 09:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Watch tower in Zadar, Croatia --MB-one 09:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roma Church. --ArildV 08:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sankt Göranstornet (The Saint George Gate), Visby.--ArildV 08:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roma Abbey is a ruined Cistercian abbey in Gotland, Sweden. --ArildV 08:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of former limestone industry on the island Furillen. --ArildV 08:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support very good composition. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Boleścin --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kindergarten in Boleścin --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oak and maple alley in Boleścin 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oak and maple alley in Boleścin 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Musikverein, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window, parish church of St. Margaretha in Sipbachzell, Upper Austria --Isiwal 07:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traunkirchen cemetery, memorial plaque for the victims of a storm on lake Traunsee --Isiwal 07:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque / wayside shrine on Johannisberg Traunkirchen, Upper Austria --Isiwal 07:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic parish church of St. Margaretha in Sipbachzell , Upper Austria --Isiwal 07:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from donjon of Rothschild Castle in Waidhofen an der Ybbs on the old town. --Isiwal 07:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Metropolitan Museum of Art. See the Image and Data Resources Open Access Policy. By User:Pharos --Satdeep Gill 06:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Not the work of a commoner --ReneeWrites 11:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    @ReneeWrites: I don't understand the reason to decline. -- Spurzem 16:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open Access at the Cleveland Museum of Art. By User:Madreiling --Satdeep Gill 06:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Not the work of a commoner --ReneeWrites 11:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    @ReneeWrites: I don't understand the reason to decline. -- Spurzem 16:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Riga Cathedral Tower from behind Stock Exchange Building with Sculpture --Scotch Mist 06:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 13:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Restaurant Pavilion in Riga City Gardens beneath Latvian Freedom Monument --Scotch Mist 06:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Liberty Statue on top of Latvian Freedom Monument – Independence Memorial in Riga --Scotch Mist 06:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Mistendorf near Bamberg --Ermell 06:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Somewhat tight cut, but Ok for QI --Isiwal 07:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former mill in Mistendorf near Bamberg --Ermell 06:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fendt 828 Vario with Pöttinger Synkro 4003 on a field near Eggolsheim --Ermell 06:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fendt 828 Vario with Pöttinger Synkro 4003 on a field near Eggolsheim --Ermell 06:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fendt 412 Vario with Horsch Terrano 3 FX cultivator on a field near Bamberg --Ermell 06:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remnants of the former sewage water treatment plant on the Tramwei at the Trambrug in Broek near Joure. Detail of the remains of the iron pipe system.
    --Famberhorst 05:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the St Christopher cathedral in Belfort, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the St Martin collegiate church in La Canourgue, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Ressouches in commune of Chanac, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but the composition isn't good because of these branches. --Halavar 12:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Avant-Porte du Croux in Nevers, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subway station Karlsplatz in Vienna. --Tsui 03:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Victoria bicycle in Vienna. --Tsui 03:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Auditorium at the Vittoriale degli Italiani. --Moroder 03:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mausoleum in the Vittoriale. --Moroder 03:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway bridge crossing the river Zwickauer Mulde at Colditz in Saxony (by Radler59) --Augustgeyler 23:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horloge de la basilique Notre-Dame du Roncier, Josselin. --Tsaag Valren 18:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Pixelization, lots of CAs. --Halavar 12:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Change of guard at the Prague Castle. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --ReneeWrites 12:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination WLMPopulonia Populonia Chiesa di Santa Croce --PROPOLI87 09:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Low level of details, not very sharp. --ArildV 09:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portugal, Largo do Padrão --Berthold Werner 07:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    Again strange clouds on the right side. --Ermell 09:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    Fortunately, I keep the sd-cards from my travels. The strange clouds are actually real and not a mistake in editing. I uploaded the original, it's now in the history of the photograph. --Berthold Werner 18:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Thanks for the info. --Ermell 18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Datatraya kasthakala matha, bhaktapur. By User:Nrik kiran --Biplab Anand 06:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Puppet, as central focal point, out of focus --Rainer Halama 08:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Techart Macan at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 19:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Trévoux, France. --Velvet 08:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks really good, but I have to ask why this photo is so much smaller than the 20.2 MP maximum resolution of the camera. What caused it to be so small? -- Ikan Kekek 10:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
    I don't remember how I processed it at the time (it was 5 years ago) and the original file is lost. I probably reduced its size to lighten the weight. --Velvet 13:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
     Question What do you mean by the weight? -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry, it is a translation from french which might be sensless in english. I mean the space it occupies. --Velvet 14:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    I see. Disc space. So not ideal, but  Support, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 06:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    The top is quite unsharp. Fixable? --Ermell 06:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 09:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose The upper part is still too blurry IMO. Maybe there are other opinions about it. --Ermell 13:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    In this case I'd rather go back to the crop with the whole ceiling as it has added value for WP instead of cropping it off and focus on the altar. Maybe it's a QI in that case but there would be some lost of information.
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Raphaelmlc --Rodrigo.Argenton 20:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support briliant. --Augustgeyler 00:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa Croce and view of the Gulf of Baratti – Populonia --PROPOLI87 19:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I am very sorry. I already told you I really like this motive. But after I have seen all these versions you nominated I do not see any improvement in resolution, sharpness or detail. I now just think, your raw does not meet the standards here. --Augustgeyler 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St John the Baptist Cathedral, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 09:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Image looks too soft. I think it would be good to add more sharpness and contrast. --Halavar 10:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 20:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Thanks, good now. QI for me --Halavar 12:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the slag heap Camphausen to the winding and hammer head tower of the Grube Camphausen. In front of it is a section of the Fischbachtalbahn. --DavidJRasp 09:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Underexposed, vignetting. Sorry --Milseburg 13:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Battle motorboat MAS 96 in the Vittoriale degli Italiani. --Moroder 07:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Some dead pixels at the right side. Easy to fix. --Ermell 09:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Done Those are not dead pixels but tiny glare points (reflexes) from the plastic floor. Thanks for the review --Moroder 08:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Local train at Leipzig main station at platform 6 in summer 1995 shot on 35mm film (by Falk2) --Augustgeyler 23:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A little soft and dreamy at 100%, but given that this was shot on film 25 years ago and this scene can't be repeated, that seems acceptable. Exposure of the train is good, and the composition is solid. --Bobulous 19:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sailing in Helsinki. --Kallerna 18:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Wow, great shot. Detail is sharp at 100% until the back of the boat, and even then it's adequate. Exposure is well controlled, and the composition is great. --Bobulous 17:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forward cabin and cockpit of an Embraer Praetor at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 08:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice depth of field with a fine focus on the displays. --Zinnmann 10:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closed-off public stairs and footpath on DB property in Rendsburg-Ost --MB-one 08:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Extreme CAs in the trees + a tinted sky. --Zinnmann 10:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Planetarium Mannheim --MB-one 20:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Looks far too dark overall. If you have the RAW file you could try boosting it, but I'm not confident that it could be saved. --Bobulous 17:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airbus A350-1000 on flying display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 20:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support The composition feels a little tight against the wing tips, and the fuselage detail is a little soft at 100% (I'm guessing because of the 2x teleconverter). But exposure is good, the view of the aircraft is clean and unobscured, and the shot looks good at full screen. --Bobulous 17:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Krems river, Neuhofen and St. Marien --Isiwal 19:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very soft along the top and right edges at 100%, but looks just about acceptable at full screen. (Possibly a narrower aperture would have helped, as f/8 is a bit wide for such a range of distances.) Exposure is balanced, and composition is clean. --Bobulous 16:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalvarienbergkapelle in Wörnitzstein, Bayern --Zinnmann 18:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice composition and depth of field, but could you fix the dark spots which are visible in the sky? Spike 15:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks for the hint. I missed that. It's fixed, now. --Zinnmann 10:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Looks good now. Spike 10:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sankt Gorshausen, seen from Sankt Goar --Milseburg 17:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support I would suggest cropping a bit at the left or lower border to get rid of the small rock in the lower left corner, but the image already has good quality. Spike 14:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC) @Spike: Thank you for the review. I removed the little rock. --Milseburg 13:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former Bungenäs kalkbruk (Lime work) in Bungenäs, Gotland. --ArildV 05:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Fat dut spot and a smaller one on the left --Poco a poco 11:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
    Minus Staubfleck --Nightflyer 13:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
    Danke, thank you. I removed some dust spots. --ArildV 17:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
    You forgot the one I meant on the left side, see note --Poco a poco 19:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
    Vogel entfernt. Das war kein Staubfleck. --Nightflyer 21:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support QI, although if I were Arild I'd rather fix them out of the RAW file, as there is a risk that this fix e.g. is not included in future updates of the image --Poco a poco 09:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black kite (Milvus migrans) on electric pole, IIT Mandi, Himachal, India. --Tagooty 15:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Too light on the bike. Pls darken the image a bit. --Zcebeci 13:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done @Zcebeci: Reduced exposure, darker brown colour --Tagooty 03:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose It looks overprocessed on the feathers, really sorry. --Vincent60030 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done @Vincent60030: I've removed the sharpening to avoid the over-processed look. Please review the latest version. --Tagooty 02:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
    Ah much better, but I would love a second opinion whether this is QI. Great job nonetheless :D --Vincent60030 05:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mündung der Schöpfwerkswettern in die Stör --Nightflyer 20:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice, but looks tilted 2° ccw. Former verions look better. --Milseburg 18:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
    Zurückgesetzt --Nightflyer 20:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC) QI for me now. --Milseburg 13:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Klagenfurt_Innere_Stadt_Neuer_Platz_2_Neue_Hauptwache_SW-Ansicht_06092020_7988.jpg

• Nomination New guardhouse on Neuer Platz #2, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose I'm sorry but this isn't a good composition: cropped footpath, half cropped lamp post on the right... --Augustgeyler 03:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Done @Augustgeyler: Thanks for your review. I cropped the rejected issues. Perhaps you pay one more look at the image and give it a second chance? —- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Your edit made it much better. Thank you! --Augustgeyler (talk) 09:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I disagree. IMO good for QI. --XRay 04:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 09:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 19:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Tulsi_Marg_Street_and_Gate_to_City_Palace,_Jaipur,_20191218_1240_9216.jpg

• Nomination Tulsi Marg Street and the gate to the City Palace in Jaipur --Jakubhal 16:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Confusing composition and focus lies on the metal frame object in front --MB-one 19:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, I would like to check other opinions. --Jakubhal 19:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Object in the front disturbs the composition, also because it is not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 20:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It's a strange composition but IMO not the worse for that, and you've captured some of the chaos and randomness of urban living. -- Ikan Kekek 07:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 08:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  weak contra The object in front disturbs the composition even through that large shadow there. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Focus is IMHO not on the metal object in front, but that item spoils the compo --Poco a poco 22:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lilium_albanicum,_Jablanica_mountain.jpg

• Nomination Lilium albanicum in Jablanica mountain --Liridon 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Request I don't see any reviews done by you as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination --Moroder 08:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice picture, but too much background with no information. Maybe cropping to potrait helps here. --Tigerente 21:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not eligible for QIC Per Poco --Moroder 21:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Definitely eligible for QI (Moroder , there is no such HARD criteria, indeed I wouldn't enforce that for unexperienced users independently where it's the case here). The image is not a QI to me due to dof issues Poco a poco 22:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like this picture. But Poco a poco is right, the dof is very small. The rules say someone who is nominating „should“ review other nominations. Nobody is forced to do so.--Augustgeyler 22:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Flowers_of_Jablanica_Mountain_(White_Crocus).jpg

• Nomination White Crocus, Jablanica Mountain --Liridon 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Request I don't see any reviews done by you as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination --Moroder 08:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not eligible for QIC--Moroder 08:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Why is it not eligible? Rhododendrites 21:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Definitely eligible. I'd support it with a tighter crop (specially at the bottom to get rid of blurry areas) Poco a poco 22:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 03:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Khosh_Bagh_Cemetery.jpg

• Nomination Khosh Bagh Cemetery in Murshidabad. By User:DeepanjanGhosh --Bodhisattwa 11:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. The white building in the background is a bit overexposed, but IMHO we can tolerate this for the overall quality. --Aristeas 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Comment I don't see any review done by the nominator as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination --Moroder 04:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Aristeas --Poco a poco 22:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Aristeas -- Ikan Kekek 09:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Guy_Zohar.jpg

• Nomination Guy Zohar. By User:Channel10israel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not the work of a commoner --DXR 06:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment It is created and uploaded by the 10th Channel, part of the People Pictures Project of Wikimedia Israel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Vincent60030 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment We should discuss find out if the creator was a commoner --Augustgeyler 13:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Augustgeyler, opposing until it's clarified --Poco a poco 22:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
• @Augustgeyler: Please note that when executing a decision by setting "QICresult", you also need to change "Discuss" to either "Promotion" or "Decline", otherwise the bot will not process it. --Peulle 19:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Teatr_im._Juliusza_Słowackiego_01.jpg

• Nomination Juliusz Słowacki Theatre. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Please correct the horizontal lines, it gives the impression it is falling--Moroder 06:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*  Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 19:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
•  weak contra I am still unsure about the horizontal lines. Lets discuss this. --Augustgeyler 10:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Another try. Hope is better now:) --Halavar 10:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 03:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 19:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Gruppo_del_compianto_Duomo_di_Salò.jpg

• Nomination Woodcarved polichromed statues of the Lamentation of Christ group in the Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò. --Moroder 03:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose I'm trying to overlook the glare in the top of the image (coming from a light source out of shot), but it overwhelms and harms the contrast on the leading figure's head. Out of curiosity, was a lens hood used? --Bobulous 19:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I disagree. Yes, but a lens hood protects from glare on the lens, Not on the object. I think the glare on the head is irrelevant compared to the object photographed under very difficult conditions. --Moroder 02:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per above. If you focus on the blown areas at full size, they look bad, but they're pretty minimal in the context of the entire photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Ikan Kekek --Scotch Mist 13:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

•  weak contra I take into account there had been hard lighting conditions but I still see this very light part on the top producing a blueish haze letting this picture not become a quality one. --Augustgeyler (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light and sharpness.--Peulle 12:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Raviv_Drucker.jpg

• Nomination Raviv Drucker. By User:Channel10israel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not the work of a commoner --DXR 06:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment It is created and uploaded by the 10th Channel, part of the People Pictures Project of Wikimedia Israel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --ReneeWrites 19:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree, there is a black noise on the top right corner. Please edit the picture @Andrew J.Kurbiko and Channel10israel: --Vincent60030 05:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support No problem from me now since it is edited. --Vincent60030 05:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Per DXR:not the work of a commoner --Moroder 07:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

* Oppose Per se ineligible per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• •  Comment @Moroder and Ikan Kekek: are you sure? The comment earlier mentioned that the uploader is part of the Wikimedia project. But if this picture is to be rejected, then the other two in Sept 19 should be rejected too. Please check and thanks for the review <3 --Vincent60030 09:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry for the mistake. Careless on my part. -- Ikan Kekek 10:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Vincent60030: , @Ikan Kekek: The point is not who and how the images were uploaded but who is the creator: "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status" --Moroder 11:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• The account has a discussion page though. If this is opposed, then might as well strip the status of all of the QIs of this user. So I am not sure about it. --Vincent60030 11:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• There is no evidence that this and the other photos are done by a commoner so there is no way that this and the other photos can be qualified QI --Moroder 10:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Opposing until authorship is clarified Poco a poco 22:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 23:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lengurbill_beach_09.jpg

• Nomination Lengurbill beach, Teknaf, Cox's Bazar. --RockyMasum 01:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. I especially like how the light hits the water, but not the beach. Excellent timing! --Kritzolina 08:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose good composition. But there is very low detail due to hard compression --Augustgeyler 11:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Please do not repeatedly confuse noise reduction with JPEG compression. JPEG, quality: 98, subsampling ON (2x2) is completely acceptable. --Smial 10:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfectly good to me. This is a photo of an overall scene and doesn't need to show each person or any other element in great detail. -- Ikan Kekek 11:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Noise reduction is a bit on the high side, therefore my "weak" support. --Smial 13:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted, bad light. --Kallerna 11:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't see any reviews done by RockyMasum as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination--Moroder 04:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I definitely remember him reviewing in the past - is there any guideline stating how often you have to comment? --Kritzolina 19:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The guidelines request that you do a review for every nomination, but it's not a hard rule. Only nominating pictures and not reviewing others' is arguably bad form, but it doesn't make them ineligible for QI. --ReneeWrites 22:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)