Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 21 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Münster,_Speicherstadt,_Handstellvorrichtung_einer_Weiche_--_2017_--_1797.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Handset of a switch in the Speicherstadt (in the background: locomotive “KÖF LG II 1944”), Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Blown out sky, needs CR --Shansov.net 02:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Doesn't seem objectionably bright to me, and that's just the bokeh background, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek 08:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Focus to the foreground and this part is sharp enough --Michielverbeek 05:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment The problem was in the overexposed sky, not in sharpness --Shansov.net 05:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --XRay 08:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Butadon 002.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Typical example of Butadon in Japan.--Ocdp 09:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Crop looks too tight. It would have been great if even the side dishes were included in the frame. --Shishir 11:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
     CommentSide dishes is NOT components of Butadon.though, should it be included? --Ocdp 22:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
     Comment True, but the cropped side dishes make the image distracting. The lighting here is also not very attractive. The image is also out of focus at the upper edge of the Butadon. This should not be the case given that it is a studio photo. But still I would like to know others opinions. --Shishir 4:45, 16 September 2017
  •  Oppose per Shishir. The cutoff of the side dishes is distracting - you could simply move them out of the field of view for the camera if you don't want to include them. I also agree with Shishir's criticism of the photography of the butadon, specifically. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose In or out, not half-way. Do or do not, there is no try.--Peulle 20:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --XRay 16:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Centraal Apotheek 1635.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Centraal Apotheek, Leeuwarden. --C messier 08:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not all picture is sharp --Cvmontuy 11:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree (it isn't IMHO possible to be partially out of focus, probably it was caused by perspective correction). --C messier 19:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is ok, I think and the overall picture looks fine to me. --Milseburg 13:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support fine indeed.--Jebulon 01:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Sharpness is solid. -- Ikan Kekek 20:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --PetarM 12:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --XRay 08:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)