Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 20 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:شاطئ_بوزنيقة.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Photo of Bouznika beach including beach houses, sand, vacationers, sea, sea rocks, seagulls, palm trees and waves in the same frame. --User:Mounir Neddi 16:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Far away from QI, many issues. --Uoaei1 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As there is no comment, vote or explanation from anybody (as per the CR rules) why this image is in CR, I'll just return the "Discuss" to a "Decline". Please, if someone actually wants to discuss this and argue why it should not be declined, add your comments here and set it to "Discuss" again.--Peulle 07:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

File:مصب_واد_بوزنيقة_على_المحيط_الأطلسي.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bouznika River mouth in the Atlantic Ocean. --User:Mounir Neddi 11:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too small and too unsharp, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With hardly over 2 MP it would have to be sharper to qualify. --Plozessor 06:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question Why is this in CR?--Peulle 06:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Maybe the nominator objected without adding a comment. --Plozessor 06:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Lancia_Fulvia_Coupé_HF_-_Vernasca_Silver_Flag_2024_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lancia Fulvia Coupé HF on display in Castell'Arquato on the occasion of the Vernasca Silver Flag 2024 --Hotolmo22 12:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is too distorted, not just the background but also the rear of the car. The lighting is also very poor. No offense, but in my opinion a quality image looks different. -- Spurzem 16:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Heavy perspective warp.--Peulle 10:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 10:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Object in shadow with bright sunlit background is not a good environment in the first place, then there's massive distortion (which would be easiest to fix) and lack of detail (as can be seen on the ground); as there's no EXIF data I can't tell whether it is due poor raw conversion or if it's smartphone picture. --Plozessor 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Tangail_DC_Lake,_Bangladesh_11.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tangail DC Lake --Kryesmin 13:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this composition doesn’t work for me. The subject is photographed from an awkward angle and is in shadow, while the background features a much brighter bush that draws attention away from the subject. --Jakubhal 11:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
It is not optimal, in the enlarged view it is barely --Georgfotoart 17:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed smartphone picture (see the ground). --Plozessor 10:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. Also, the categories and description are insufficient.--Peulle 10:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Smial 10:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Tangail_DC_Lake,_Bangladesh_08.jpg

[edit]

  • well, maybe everything unnecessary could be cut off --Georgfotoart 17:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jakubhal. Fix the perspective, crop around the sculptures and improve the description, then it would be ok. --Plozessor 11:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Multiple issues. Also, the categories and description are insufficient.--Peulle 10:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)