Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 15 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Midnight sun over Inuvik from Dempster Highway.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The midnight sun from just south of Inuvik --Daniel Case 05:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline *  Support Good quality. --Pudelek 10:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy and unsharp (I guess due to diffraction), many dust spots and even more lens flares. --C messier 12:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier. Pity, 'cause it's a nice motìf.--Peulle 06:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Aachen,_Dom_--_2016_--_2743.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 15:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Top crop is too tight and the picture seems to be slightly leaning to the right. --Code 05:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Fixed Sorry, you're right. It's better now, may be good enough. --XRay 15:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me now as it is. --Hubertl 02:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm agree with Code, sorry.--Lmbuga 12:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC).
  •  Comment Bad picture--Lmbuga 17:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination Bad? But you're right, it's not the best. --XRay 16:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bonn,_Beethoven-Denkmal_--_2016_--_4023.jpg

[edit]

 Comment @Hubertl: Of course there is a chance to get it sharp all over. The foreground is acceptable sharp, the buildings and the crane in the far background are acceptable sharp, the head is not. So it is not a problem of DOF and short distance. This is in most cases a result of either a perspective correction (my guess) or a very bad lens (don't think so, even cheap kit lenses perform better). -- Smial 10:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Sorry. This is one IMO of the worst possible pictures. It's incredible. Congratulations for the author: it's realy a bad picture--Lmbuga 17:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC).  new comment --> Bad composition:too tight at top. Unfortunate light. Back of the sculpture. A lot of elemnts disturbing. The correction of the perspective distortion is a problem: bad horizontal perspective corrretion. Upper side of the statue is blurry. Edge of the upper side has a blue halo.... INCREDIBLE!!!--Lmbuga 17:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Español: Le agadecería al autor que retirase la foto porque la inconsistencia y falta de criterio de los usuarios es mucha--Lmbuga 17:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --(Withdrawn) Jee 04:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]