Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 08 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Rear side of a bunker in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hatch at the guard building in the US Army area of the special ammunition camp in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former post office in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lüdinghausen gate, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erbdrostenhof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clearance height Broeresleat under the bridge in the A7 Joure Sneek.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Clearance height Broeresleat under the bridge in the A7 Joure Sneek.
-
- Nomination Westpolderbrêge. A new bridge over Broeresleat, will be realized in 2020.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Westpolderbrêge. A new bridge over Broeresleat, will be realized in 2020.
-
- Nomination Row of five red wooden bungalows on stilts with terraces and steep roofs, illuminated by the sun in Otherside guesthouse, Vang Vieng, Vientiane Province, Laos. --Basile Morin 04:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rural way and fence in Virunum on Zollfeld, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corncobs at a maize field in Virunum on Zollfeld, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern view of the farm buildings of guest house Fleissner in Zollfeld, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Roman relief medaillon (portrait grave stone of a Roman couple with child) at the guest house Fleissner on Zollfeld #3, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman stone relief of a groom with horse at the guesthouse Fleissner on Zollfeld #3, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The ancient fortress of the Aigosthena, Attica. --C messier 21:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. There are two little dark spots toward the upper right corner, but I think they're birds or something. If they're not, you can fix them. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geranium pratense in Podolsk, Moscow region, Russia --Никонико962 20:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorials in the Valley of death, former concentration camp Flossenbürg - memorial for Sinti and Roma --Kritzolina 20:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sule Pagoda. Yangon, Myanmar. --Halavar 20:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 01:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shwedagon Pagoda. Yangon, Myanmar. --Halavar 20:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barriquand groyne at low tide at en:Soulac-sur-Mer, France. --Touam 19:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice and atmospheric. -- Ikan Kekek 03:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dino Cazares performing with Fear Factory in Saint Petersburg 2013 --Bobulous 18:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, good focus under difficult circumstances, right moment for high ISO --Michielverbeek 19:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Babis Mta view from Cheget mountain --KpokeJlJla 18:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice scene, crisp, good exposure. --Bobulous 18:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bikeways in Quebec city --Wilfredor 16:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Samanea saman roots (rain tree), specimen fallen into the water of the Mekong at golden hour in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 15:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine nera Esch-sur-Sûre. --Cayambe 14:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rowers with red shirts on a long racing pirogue during a competition in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. Team of Don Som. --Basile Morin 14:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior view of the Buddhist temple Amidado (Amida hall) with a statue of the Buddha seated, Kiyomizu-dera, Tatsumicho, Higashiyama Ward, Kyoto, Japan. --Basile Morin 11:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Fine quality and detailed description. --Palauenc05 11:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Eisenach (1921). --Palauenc05 09:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Joseph, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Joseph, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Joseph, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Joseph, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Joseph, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 09:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunge kyrka. --ArildV 08:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 11:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Brighton Library, New Brighton --Podzemnik 06:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, interesting composition --Michielverbeek 07:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eicher ED 16/II at the tractor meeting 2018 in the open-air museum Glentleiten --Ermell 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination IHC tractor at the tractor meeting 2018 in the open-air museum Glentleiten --Ermell 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lanz D 1266 at the tractor meeting 2018 in the open-air museum Glentleiten --Ermell 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lanz D 3506 at the tractor meeting 2018 in the open-air museum Glentleiten --Ermell 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schlüter S 25 at the tractor meeting 2018 in the open-air museum Glentleiten --Ermell 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Miradouro do Véu da Noiva on Seixal, Madeira --Llez 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 06:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old mill wheel, Achdorf, Blumberg, Germany --Llez 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Certainly a QI if you remove the CAs along the wooden boards. --Palauenc05 06:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Llez 09:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Support Perfect now. --Palauenc05 10:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kriegsgräber auf dem Friedhof von Schacht-Audorf --Nightflyer 21:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. I added at least one more category for the signs - please check --Podzemnik 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caldwell County Jail, Lockhart, Texas, United States. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 15:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Tilted and heavily downsized --Podzemnik 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subway in Lyon, France --Billy69150 13:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Pixelated, grainy, unfortunate angle as the conrete platform doesn't add much to the photo --Podzemnik 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saarburg, Saarburg, St. Laurentius --Berthold Werner 12:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Chigi Zondadari - Stories of Abraham Romanesque bas-relief in marble from the mid-12th century coming from the Pieve dei SS. Quirico and Giuditta, now Collegiate-- PROPOLI87 10:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry but part of the object is out of focus. Not very sharp and noisy, --ArildV 08:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tomb of Absalom. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review
It needs some sharpening --Poco a poco 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Buildings in Austin, Texas, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 00:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review Sky too oversatured, sorry --Elryck 05:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Botswana Safari Tourism. By User:Ophir Mizrah --Elryck 12:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review No comment about the quality of the picture, but it needs a more meaningful filename, and the categorization is unsatisfactory, so I would oppose on that basis if no other, unless those things are fixed. -- Ikan Kekek 23:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC) - I withdraw my nomination Je viens de m'apercevoir qu'elle provenait de Flikr et contrevenait aux règles. Désolé pour cette erreur.--Elryck 05:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
C'est pas un probleme, mais is faut utiliser le template (gabarit?) {{withdraw}}. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tel Aviv HaShalom train station. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 00:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A mural of a lesser mouse-deer (Tragulus kanchil) on a wall in Malacca City, Malaysia. GerifalteDelSabana 10:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Recaro CL4710 medium haul business class seats at Passenger Experience Week 2018, Hamburg --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted? --Mdaniels5757 01:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: Thank you for the review. I fixed the tilt. --MB-one 11:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Albarine river in Saint-Rambert-en-Bugey, France. --Chabe01 11:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Review La résolution par pixel me paraît un peu faible, donc les détails sont un peu flous--Elryck 07:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Needs a perspective correction, i.e., the verticals (now leaning out) should be vertical. --Aristeas 09:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Comtois horse branding --Tsaag Valren 23:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Valuable but I would like to see the head of horse at least too. --Zcebeci 07:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
A vertical crop to show the brand and enough of the body for context would work. As-is not a QI. --Tagooty 09:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose As the others: This crop is not QI imho. --Stepro 00:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Leinleitertal_trocken-20200403-RM-163718.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Dry valley above the Leinleiterquelle --Ermell 06:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I am missing a better composition. --Augustgeyler 13:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Not the most spectacular motif, but technically the image quality is very good. --Milseburg 13:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Very good for me -- Spurzem 18:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 09:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Fliegerhorst_Vogler_in_Hörsching,_Upper_Austria,_Austria-entrance-wide_PNr°0722.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The entrance of Fliegerhorst Vogler (Air base Vogler) in Hörsching, Upper Austria, Austria --D-Kuru 19:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --C messier 16:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree , bad composition, a little blurried --Celeda 15:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support It is good enough. --Vincent60030 17:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Sufficient for QI. --PtrQs 23:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I am with Celeda. That is not a good composition. There is way too much nothing in the foreground.--Augustgeyler 12:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 09:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Borujerdi_House,_Kashan,_Iran2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran--Amirpashaei 08:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- The lower level is not vertical, but tilted in ccw direction, it feels like it needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! --Augustgeyler 17:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Overrulling other reviewer's comments isn't really respectful. It isn't a QI to me like this if the issue is not addressed --Poco a poco 21:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment What did I do? I am sorry, but I saw you just commenting in the first place. You did not vote.--Augustgeyler 22:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Augustgeyler I didn't vote because it wasn't yet a QI to me, only after changes were applied. In this away I avoid too many candidates going to the CR section, which requires manual work and is time-consuming for everybody. Only if I believe that the image cannot be saved I decline. Poco a poco 11:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose for now per Poco a Poco's ccw tilt review. Furthermore: wonderful! --PtrQs 00:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Combe_Laval,_Drôme.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Combe Laval, France--Celeda 08:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Washed out details, sorry. --Peulle 10:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Peulle I'm really very surprise by your opinion about "washed out details. The absence of detail in the background emphazises the foreground. It's a very classic photo technique.--Celeda 05:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- On Wikimedia Commons, March 2020, photo challenge topic Gorges and Canyons, this photo finished first. It won 34 stars an 17 people think it's a good or even a very good picture. So far it's the second best score of the year. --Celeda 05:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- On the views of others I can offer no opinion. I maintain that the image has a very low level of detail, even the main subject. It looks like a mobile phone photo.--Peulle 07:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. Main object is in focus. --Ermell 15:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle. Ignoring the background, most of the foreground on the right side is extremely unsharp with some kind of artifacts, very disturbing to me. Also, Photo Challenge is judged differently from QIC. I find that often the judging there is about how striking the image is, not whether it's technically a good photo or not, though of course technically excellent photos can and do win. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Cons: corners unsharp, esp. bottom right. Burnt highlights on the stone wall. Some colliding sharpening and denoising. Pros: excellent composition, good lighting, appealing colours, full camera resolution, printable to A4 and larger in good quality. --Smial 11:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, specially bottom and top. I disagree with Smials review, this is not FP where other factors could compensate the lack of quality. Here it is only about quality and there is lack of it here. Poco a poco 22:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Absolutely objective quality criteria do not exist in photography. Every photo has flaws, if you look for it long enough. Every photo has grain or noise, one more, the other less. Every photo is blurred, one more, the other less. If QIC was exclusively about technical quality criteria, the criterion "composition" would not exist at all, because it is always a question of personal taste. All possible compositional mistakes according to common understanding can always be interpreted as a conscious choice of the photographer and should therefore not be evaluated. But here they are evaluated daily and hourly:Too narrow cropping, too wide cropping, main motif too much in the middle, main motif too much at the edge, too much sky, too little sky, too little DOF, too much DOF, too colorful, too low contrast, etc., etc.
If it were really only a matter of objective criteria, any digitally perspective-corrected photo would have to be rejected, for example, because any photo that has been processed in this way is generally unsharp in the "stretched" areas; the more correction has been made, the more blurred it is. Blurred photos must be rejected, however. The only way to avoid this is to scale the image down so far that the blurred areas created in the image processing are no longer noticeable.But then the photo would have to be rejected because it was scaled down inadmissibly. Conclusion: The point of view that QIC is only about (technical) quality is absolutely untenable, because every picture here is a compromise, sometimes more, sometimes less successful. That's why I take the liberty to weigh up between all the many possible mistakes, design intentions, technical compromises. QIC was originally an event to motivate photographers to deliver images that are free of major flaws.QIC is not a competition to show who can afford the most expensive cameras and lenses. --Smial 00:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Comment Absolutely objective quality criteria do not exist in photography. Every photo has flaws, if you look for it long enough. Every photo has grain or noise, one more, the other less. Every photo is blurred, one more, the other less. If QIC was exclusively about technical quality criteria, the criterion "composition" would not exist at all, because it is always a question of personal taste. All possible compositional mistakes according to common understanding can always be interpreted as a conscious choice of the photographer and should therefore not be evaluated. But here they are evaluated daily and hourly:Too narrow cropping, too wide cropping, main motif too much in the middle, main motif too much at the edge, too much sky, too little sky, too little DOF, too much DOF, too colorful, too low contrast, etc., etc.
- Weak Support Interesting and beautiful view, good colors but sharpness not the best -- Spurzem 06:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support per others. --Palauenc05 15:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very blurry out of center. Unfortunately the main subject is out of center. --PtrQs 00:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy. At first, I thought that I was looking at some image processed with a filter to make it look like being a painting. I go with Smial on the point of really good composition, though, but the technical flaws are enough for being against a promotion. Regards, --Grand-Duc 00:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:20200816_Widok_na_Ostrowiec_Świętokrzyski_w_pół_w_Bodzechowie_1015_3666.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski from the fields in Bodzechów --Jakubhal 04:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose well composed, nice bouchée in the foreground. But there is to much haze, isn't it? --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to check what others think about it also. --Jakubhal 17:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Unfortunately the heat flare cannot be avoided. The image is just realistic.--Ermell 13:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Per Ermell --Moroder 01:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Question Maybe you can lower the intensity of those red/magenta roof tiles in the foreground? --PtrQs 00:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 09:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)