Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 29 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lake_Irene_Rocky_Mountain_National_Park_2024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lake Irene in Rocky Mountain National Park --Nv8200pa 12:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Composition is kind of awkward with the cut off lake and trees. Would be improved by being either (a) farther away from the lake, so you can view the entire lake at once, or (b) closer to the lake and showing the horizon --Buidhe 03:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • I thought the trees framed the lake nicely, but I can see your point. Nv8200pa 10:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Who keeps sending images to CR without any comments as to why? I'm half a mind to just overrule and decline at this point...--Peulle 07:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nobody did that. However, Buidhe set the image to "/Discuss" when adding the comment and you added the opposing vote. @Buidhe: Please don't send anything to CR unless there is a prior vote that you disagree with. Just adding the first review and sending an image to CR is against the rules. Thanks --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition might be acceptable as it is, though it is obviously either downscaled or (probably) cropped. Would like it more with less tight upper crop (more of the trees and sky visible). However, it seems also overprocessed/overcontrasted and tilted. --Plozessor 04:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Gädheim_Mariä_Himmelfahrt_Altar_HRS-20241020-RM-161354.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Altar in the Church of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary in Gädheim --Ermell 07:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:52, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much chroma on the sculpture on the top right & left, tablecloth of both altars. Flowers on the right have variable sharpness. ReneeWrites 10:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done
    Better now?--Ermell 22:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful and good -- Spurzem 08:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good. --Plozessor 04:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Cow_Nokrek_Daribokgre_West_Garo_Oct24_A7CR_03627.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bull swishing its tail, Nokrek Biosphere Reserve, Daribokgre Community Reserve --Tagooty 00:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but most parts of the cow are blurry --Екатерина Борисова 15:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I must agree.--Peulle 07:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Екатерина. --Plozessor 04:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Bad_Breisig-Waldorf,_katholische_Kirche_Sankt_Remaklus_Dm_IMG_2509_2024-06-02_17.05.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Waldorf in Rheinland Pfakz, catholic church: Kirche Sankt Remaklus --Michielverbeek 04:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Stronger exposure of main object ✓ Done --Michielverbeek 06:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Still too dark IMO (look w/ a white frame and/or at the histogram), I'd add almost 1 ev. --Trougnouf 13:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark, considering that it was taken during sunshine on a summer day. --Plozessor 04:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

File:20211029_Ludwigspark_Malstatt_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Ludwigspark in Saarbrücken-Malstatt in Autumn --FlocciNivis 16:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Underexposed IMO. I hope details aren't lost in dark areas. --Benjism89 21:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Ptrump16 05:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral for now, changing to discuss as first comment has not been addressed --Jakubhal 05:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
    Exposure is not determined by minimal bark of a tree trunk when photographing a forest. The photo is exposed adequately for the light available for the subject: the changing leaves.. --Ptrump16 16:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've adjusted the exposure now. Thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 11:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, for me now Jakubhal 14:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Better now, thannks. --Benjism89 19:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok now. --Plozessor 04:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)