Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 28 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:20231024_song_sparrow_south_meadows_PND08127.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --BigDom 14:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:012_Wild_Chamois_Riederalp_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chamois in the Aletsch Forest Nature Reserve --Giles Laurent 21:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    tilted?? --Charlesjsharp 11:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
    This picture was shot with perfect horizontal tilt according to the viewfinder. The "tilt effect" is probably an optical illusion because it is at 600mm. In reality, the chamois is on a slope and was looking down. I did not change the tilt with a crop to align it with the slope because the result would be unnatural since it would make it look like that all the trees would be falling to the right. For a context of this image you can look at this image shot a few minutes before at 200mm. You will see it's a slope and that the trees are going upward. --Giles Laurent 12:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
    Let's hear what others think. --Giles Laurent 14:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I do not think that this is tilted as the trees look upright to me. I like the composition and the head is perfect in focus. This is a QI to me. --AFBorchert 06:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good capture. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks. A weird optical illusion. Charlesjsharp 10:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, no issues with the perspective. --Plozessor 10:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support FPC? --Smial 08:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 04:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 10:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

File:20230314_Zum_Römischen_Kaiser_Mainz.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The house Zum Römischen Kaiser in Mainz --FlocciNivis 13:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment A bit too bright, otherwise good --MB-one 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 19:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Too bright and not sharp (especially the upper part). If the RAW image can be redeveloped with correct exposure/brightness, we can probably turn a blind eye to the lack of sharpness, but with both it's not QI IMHO. --Plozessor 16:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Brightness is better now. Still it's not really sharp though. --Plozessor 03:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The picture is now a little darker overall and is therefore OK in my opinion. Further I think it is sharp enough. However, the photographer should perhaps have waited another two days respectively until Sunday, then there would probably have been less delivery trucks in front of the magnificent building. -- Spurzem 17:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support QI in my eyes. Without the delivery trucks and with blue sky it would be better, but it's authentic like it is. We can't expect, that photographers wait so long. --Milseburg 18:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Question Is that shade of gray too dark? -- Ikan Kekek 19:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me now. ̺@Plozessor: did you intend strike your opposing vote or just the part about brightness? --MB-one 08:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Striking the opposing vote, sorry.
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Bloem_van_een_Plumbago_auriculata._10-10-2023._(d.j.b).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Flower of a Plumbago auriculata. Focus stack of 13 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Llez 05:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose fine for QI but work needed on focus stacking errors around stamen --Charlesjsharp 09:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
     Comment This should have been in CR for quite some time, because there is a supporting vote. CR should begin tomorrow. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are 2 red hot pixels to the left of the stem near the bottom of the picture frame. Otherwise a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I said it was fine for QI and had not intended to oppose. Sorry. Charlesjsharp 10:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)