Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 21 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Соборная_мечеть_(деталь)_в_Санкт-Петербурге,_Россия_2H1A4281WI.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Minaret (by Kora27) --FBilula 11:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Pixelation in the sky should be improved --Poco a poco 16:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support But subject is clear QI, its not FP nomine. --PetarM 17:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Overruling reviews of other users is not a best practice. Moving to CR --Poco a poco 18:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I didnt saw you put a vote !? That is not overruling. --PetarM 18:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
But Poco commented already on an issue, it's not common to simply promote an image where someone else pointed out an issue already. --Plozessor 14:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I agree with PetarM, if we don't want an edit on an image, we have to write it. If PetarM thinks the image is good like that, he have to vote ! Because in the other way, the edit will be probably done by the nominator. --Sebring12Hrs 17:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:46, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good IMO. --Plozessor 14:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Mating_pair_of_Cigaritis_vulcanus_-_Common_Silverline.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mating pair of Cigaritis vulcanus - Common Silverline. By User:Sarpitabose --Atudu 12:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Lack of DOF (see head of the lower butterfly) - elsewhere a beautiful picture --Grunpfnul 18:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The head on the left is slightly out of focus, but you can see it's because it's positioned slightly to the back. The right head and both abdomens are in focus, so the most important parts are sharp, and the out of focus bit isn't that bad, and circumstantial rather than through a mistake of the photographer. You get a low DOF for macro shots like these, and I think we should be slightly more charitable towards those circumstances. ReneeWrites 18:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Renee. --Plozessor 14:46, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)