Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 18 2014

• 
  • Nomination Durrës Amphitheatre, Albania --Pudelek 22:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Tower in Durrës, Albania --Pudelek 22:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination League of Prizren building in Prizren, Kosovo --Pudelek 22:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Central library, Indianapolis, USA --Poco a poco 21:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman Baths, Bath, England --Poco a poco 21:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altja, Lahemaa National Park, Estonia --Poco a poco 21:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Albarracín Cathedral, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 21:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hong Kong Airport --Poco a poco 21:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The coast in the viewpoint of O Cruceiro. Santo André de Teixido, Cedeira, Galicia-T02 --Lmbuga 21:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential buildings in Cedeira, Galicia -C05 --Lmbuga 21:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedeira village, Galicia -C06 --Lmbuga 21:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential buildings in Cedeira, Galicia -C07 --Lmbuga 21:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but please, see note --Poco a poco 21:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge at the mouth of the river Condomiñas, Cedeira, Galicia -C08 --Lmbuga 21:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The basilica of Santa Croce in Florence seen from Palazzo Vecchio (Florence) --Giulio1996Cordignano 21:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, too blurry, jpg artefacts, poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Dorothy church in Radków 1 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Dorothy church in Radków 2 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Dorothy church in Radków 3 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Dorothy church in Radków 4 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Radków 1 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Halavar 20:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain of the Tritons --Livioandronico2013 19:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Insufficient quality. --Hubertl 19:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Hubertl What mean:"Insufficient quality." You must write a valid reason --Livioandronico2013 19:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    insufficient quality is reason enough, there is no part which is good for QI. --Hubertl 20:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Hubertl Try to be more respectful of the work of others, find me one picture where is written simply "insufficient quality" --Livioandronico2013 20:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of castle in Oria --Livioandronico2013 19:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Please check the perspective and the oversharpening. Which is homemade, because you've set up your camera with a strong sharpening filter. --Hubertl 19:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Odla de Valdusa" peak, peak cross and peak book in the Geisler group (Dolomites).Elevation 2936 m". On the right the peak of "Sas dal Ega" --Moroder 17:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The"Mont dal ega", "Cresta de Longiarú", "Duleda" and Puez peaks in the Geisler and Puez group (Dolomites). View from the "Odla de Valdusa" peak (2936 m)" --Moroder 17:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giantree at Waves Vienna 2014 --Tsui 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Hubertl 18:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giantree at Waves Vienna 2014 --Tsui 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Hubertl 18:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schmieds Puls at Waves Vienna 2014 --Tsui 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Hubertl 18:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road D 24, evening, Salles-Lavalette, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Knights of the Cross leaving for the battle of La Bocquée (1163), mural painting (end of the 12th century), temple of Cressac, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a wayside cross, Saint-Martial Viveyrols, Dordogne, France. --JLPC 16:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rizhsky Avenue in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rizhsky Avenue in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain of St. Florian, Zámecké náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 16:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Townhouse, 17 Farní street, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 16:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church tower Kleinkems. Southern Germany.
    Famberhorst 15:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of the entrance to the new crematorium at the Woodland cemetery in Stockholm. --ArildV 13:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to the new crematorium at the Woodland cemetery in Stockholm. --ArildV 13:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Diana and Atteone Fountain --Livioandronico2013 12:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn its oversharpened. --Hubertl 17:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Hubertl why discuss? If you don't think that should be QI you would decline,anyway i up another version,give a look please,thanks. --Livioandronico2013 18:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    probably, you cannot solve the problem, because you've set up your camera with a strong sharpening filter.--Hubertl 20:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination gateway Raiffeisenstraße 7 --F. Riedelio 12:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination villa Weinstraße 82 --F. Riedelio 12:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 15:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Pyotr Zyla --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Geneva Rugby Cup - 20140808 - SF vs LOU --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --ArildV 15:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - José Maria Larocca et Tortola --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Hubertl 15:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Facciata dell' Orologio" with 6 statues from the Roman antique buildt between 1608 and 16015 by Bartolomeo Monopola seen from the Doge's Palace courtyard in Venice (Guide d'Italia, Venezia. Touring Club Italiano 2007, page 254) --Moroder 11:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 15:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Townhouse, Přívoz, 176 Nádražní street, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 10:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall, Slezská Ostrava, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 10:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside an old Radar base, Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 10:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Berlin Hi-Flyer --A.Savin 09:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good Quality --Hubertl 16:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Berlin Hi-Flyer --A.Savin 09:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good Quality --Hubertl 16:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Berlin Hi-Flyer --A.Savin 09:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 15:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Col dala Crëusc" from "Mont dal Ega" in the Geisler and Puez group (Dolomites). --Moroder 09:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination John od Nepomuk statue at the church in Idzików --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Idzików --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Krosnowice 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose clipped white on the top --A.Savin 09:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Krosnowice 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please try to preselect the pictures you nominate by yourself! It´s boring and annoying sometimes! --Hubertl 16:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Krosnowice 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Informative... --Hubertl 16:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Krosnowice 6 --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trains at Amersham station. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination as on second inspection I don't think it's good enough. Mattbuck 17:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Millennium Dome. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 221 at Dudley Port. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree - lack of sharpness --Ehsc 10:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination ~~~~
• 
  • Nomination Marsh Wall, London. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 91112 at Chathill. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staithes, Yorkshire. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berwick-upon-Tweed railway station. Mattbuck 07:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Diana and Atteone Fountain --Livioandronico2013 06:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 09:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done More sharp,Better? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 15:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry, but it is even worse!--Hubertl 18:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inuksuk sculpture in Quebec City at the Parliament --MB-one 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok.--ArildV 15:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ENAP, Teluq and UdQ buildings in Quebec City --MB-one 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 15:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skarpnäck metro station (exit), Stockholm. --ArildV 06:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skarpnäck metro station, Stockholm. --ArildV 06:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Maritime Museum (Sjöhistoriska) in Stockholm, Sweden. --ArildV 06:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fuchsia 'Menna'
    Famberhorst 04:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hofburg with its moat in Brixen, South Tyrol --Uoaei1 04:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcaded courtyard of the Hofburg in Brixen, South Tyrol --Uoaei1 04:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lüdinghauser Tor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Unconventional, but very well done --Uoaei1 14:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint Maurice, Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief in the forecastle of Burg Vischering, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the St.-Paulus-Dom, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful atmosphere.--Famberhorst 05:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor ox stables (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor destillery (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good --A.Savin 09:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor smithy (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor cellar (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline sorry, but it´s really underexposed! --Hubertl 22:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of a Honda CRV --Ezarate 22:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry,but the bottom is no good in this way. --Livioandronico2013 07:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Concordiatempel, inside of cupola, palace garden of Laxenburg castle, Lower Austria --P e z i 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --JLPC 16:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojska Polskiego Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 3 --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Kłodzka Street in Gorzanów 3 --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Idzików 1 --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad position - wires are disturbing --Uoaei1 14:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Isaac's Square in Saint Petersburg (by Pavlikhin) --Florstein 18:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support (weak); OK, but sharpness is borderline --A.Savin 09:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --JLPC 16:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Central library, Indianapolis, USA --Poco a poco 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Nejc Dezman --Pleclown 16:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 09:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 3 --Jacek Halicki 11:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose clipped clouds --A.Savin 09:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nebamoon garden, fresco from Nebamoon tomb, Thebes, Egypt. Painting on plaster, 1380 BC. --Yann 14:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not sharp enough, sorry. --Uoaei1 14:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    New version. Please check. --Yann 15:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
     Support This version is fine --Uoaei1 19:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta, Ceres Fountain --Livioandronico2013 13:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Oppose sharpness problems, clipped white --A.Savin 09:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done More sharp and corrections,better? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 16:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    No. --A.Savin 21:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks A.Savin as always exhaustive --Livioandronico2013 23:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canada Water station. Mattbuck 09:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment CA on the roof and the upper part of the house is not sharp. --Steindy 12:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
    The sharpness isn't fixable, due to perspective correction. Mattbuck 17:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dondo Kolosh at St. Martin's Island. --Aftab1995 22:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, but it is much too noisy. --Hockei 20:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination a very common Jungle Flower with charming beauty --Aftab1995 22:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Overexposed, noisy and not sharp.--Hockei 20:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of the Fountain of the Saint Clare's Convent, Toledo, Spain.--Alurín 17:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital 3 --Jacek Halicki 10:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: viewpoint "Kipphorn", Elbe Sandstone Mountains, Saxon Switzerland, Germany --Tobi 87 08:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Some overexposed areas (probably unavoidable due to direct sunlight), but very disturbing lens flares. Tried to stamp them out? --Tuxyso 08:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 456005 at New Cross Gate. Mattbuck 10:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose OE, burned out white line in foreground --Christian Ferrer 17:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Franciscan monastery complex in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 11:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window in franciscan monastery complex in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 11:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --MB-one 07:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 11:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Viktor of Xanten Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 11:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrought iron gate to the Sentmaringer Park, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 11:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 10:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline the right is leaning in --Christian Ferrer 17:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Not done --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Rizhsky_Avenue_SPB_01.jpg

• Nomination Rizhsky Avenue in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
• I can´t see any idea and no reason to nominate this image. --Hubertl 18:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • It's your narrow thinking problem. --Florstein 19:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Hubertl Try to be more respectful of the work of others. --Livioandronico2013 20:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• This is not FPC. QI nominations are done for image quality, they don’t have to show something special or extraordinary. Of course an image of a street in a town is nominable. However, Oppose I’m sorry this is not sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 19:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Alas, you're right. I missed it. --Florstein 17:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB »0Q1 Wood Wharf, Kamalaya and Millennium Dome.jpg

• Nomination Yacht Kamalaya at Wood Wharf. Mattbuck 06:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeLens halo. --MB-one 10:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  CommentGiven the halo was intentional in this shot, I'd like another opinion please. --Mattbuck 00:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Always oppose to the artistic shots,here. Anyway the lights are too strong. --Livioandronico2013 08:11, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Interesting lighting. QI for me. -- Spurzem 21:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 13:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-08 Barcelona Estació de França.jpg

• Nomination Barcelona Estació de França, train station in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose - Fails the "meaningful" filename criteria. --Mattbuck 20:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  Name OK now. --Yann 10:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  OK, but the image is not QI on technical merits - very bad chromatic noise. Mattbuck 18:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, a lot of noise, which looks like it was then sharpened in PP, giving the image a mottled appearance, see the back wall, and especially the clock, but the problem exists throughout most of the image. --Generic1139 14:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 07:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 11:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-04_Aqueduct_in_Cerdanyola_del_Vallès,_Catalonia.jpg

• Nomination Aqueduct in Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia --Ralf Roletschek 21:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose - Fails the "meaningful" filename criteria. --Mattbuck 20:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  Name OK now. --Yann 10:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  OK, but this image is not QI on technical merits either - extremely noisy, visible dust spots, bad composition (occluding tree), posterisation. Mattbuck 18:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Composition and lighting is ok, in all other respects overprocessed. Mattbuck is apart from the criticism of the composition right. -- Smial 20:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 11:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:St Pancras railway station MMB J4 43047.jpg

• Nomination 43047 at St Pancras. Mattbuck 09:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion sorry, should be sharper-Johanning 16:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
   Sharpened. Mattbuck 09:58, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Thanks, but I am not completely convinced (see left side of elevator), so I leave the decision to others -Johanning 19:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Livioandronico2013 16:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Could you explain what you find lacking? Mattbuck 19:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Sure,not enough sharp --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I can not understand the criticism from Livioandronico2013. Of course QI. --Steindy 22:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

• Steindy learn to respect the other opinion,if for you is good i respect your decision.Here all have a different opinion (if you dont't noticed).Thanks. --Livioandronico2013 08:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

• Dear Livioandronico2013, and you learn to respect, the work of other user. First, you give a contra without notice. On demand you answer „sure, not enough sharp“. I do not see the best of intentions, what should it focus. The relevant elements of the platform, and the roof of the train and is ready to everything sharp. Thanks too! --Steindy 17:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• @Steindy respect for you would be to put a positive at all? You have not yet figured out that if one has an opinion different from yours does not really have bad intentions or that it is bad, but it has another opinion. For you it's all clear? ok FOR ME NO! How can I make you understand just do not know. Furthermore, the user has asked me to explain and I promptly replied , then ???? I tell you:respect the opinions of others and be more humble --Livioandronico2013 19:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• @ Livioandronico2013 Then they say specifically what it is out of focus. I have found nothing that supported your statement. Nothing else I've said. --Steindy 19:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

• @SteindyFor me, as for Johanning, it is not enough sharp (see on the left and the lift). I never said that is not in focus, or is terrible.I don't understand all this, not even the person concerned complained that much and you're doing it a crusade.If so for each photo would be a war. --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Boring, but within QI limits... -- Smial 21:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LC-de 11:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dalian_Liaoning_China_Cablecar-02.jpg

• Nomination Dalian Liaoning China: Cablecar between new and old zoo of Dalian --Cccefalon 12:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, but the image is somewhat whitewashed. PointsofNoReturn 20:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't know, what you mean with "whitewashed". Too much white? - the histo says no. It's easy to accept a decline, if there is a photographic reason, but I need more than just a new buzzword. --Cccefalon 13:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Don't rely only on histograms, as they in most cases don't show very small areas of overexposure. There are some in that image. Also not very sharp in the upper parts. Low DOF? Or perspective corrected? -- Smial 20:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 11:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Cooped_up_Fishing_ships_in_the_harbour_of_Lauwersoog_during_the_5-6_december_2013_storm_02.jpg

• Nomination Cooped up Fishing ships in the harbour of Lauwersoog during the 5-6 december 2013 storm --Uberprutser 18:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Sorry, but the image is not 2 Megapixels --PointsofNoReturn 19:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support PointsofNoReturn the picture is almost 4Mpx,check better next time,thanks. --Livioandronico2013 20:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon 19:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 17:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural color of the sea IMO. The plants of the bottom (foreground) are disturbing. Jpeg artifacts IMO (see note)--Lmbuga 17:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, Lmbuga, this is not the atlantic ocean and not mediterranian sea, this is Waddenzee, the colour is absolutely natural especially on windy days or after a storm ;-) -- Smial 19:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks--Lmbuga 21:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --LC-de 09:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Berwick-upon-Tweed railway station MMB 09 221120.jpg

• Nomination 221120 at Berwick. Mattbuck 11:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeInsufficient quality.Unsharp,especially on the right. --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Mattbuck 19:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
    • If for you this is sharp... see note--Livioandronico2013 20:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand why you delete the note of Livioandronico2013--Lmbuga 17:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I'm agree with the deleted note of Livioandronico2013 (visible in the history of the file). It's not QI for me, sorry--Lmbuga 17:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry Lmbuga,but you are agree o disagree? I don't understand --Livioandronico2013 19:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

  Sorry,now understand --Livioandronico2013 07:20, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

• Weak  Support Somewhat low DOF, but the train's front as main subject is sharp. --Smial 19:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 09:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_park_zdrojowy_08.JPG

• Nomination Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 23:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Please ahave a look to my notes. IMO there are overexposed areas. And please add an english description.--XRay 06:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Put to Discussion for mentioned issues. --P e z i 11:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The upper side (1/5 of the picture) is a bit blurry, but QI for me. Crop? --Lmbuga 17:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support as for lmbuga. -- Smial 19:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --LC-de 09:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Gródek_brama_cerkiewna_632844.jpg

• Nomination Gate of orthodox church in Gródek (Poland, podlaskie voivodeship). By User:AndyTheVine --Winiar 18:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The edges are leaning in. Mattbuck 21:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Put to Discussion for mentioned issues. --P e z i 11:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Reddish CA on both sides of the gate. --Halavar 11:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reddish CA, perspective. And I am surprised, that clearly visible CA is "good quality". --Cccefalon 04:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose It needs perspective correction. Too dark. CAs. Why 1/2,000 sec? Is it a random file? --Lmbuga 17:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Slight leaning is imo not disturbing. CA is very, VERY small. If this small amount is a reason to decline, we have to remove probably 80% of all QI until now. Btw: There is of course also some greenish CA. Did you not see? -- Smial 20:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 09:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Podziemna_trasa_turystyczna_w_Kłodzku_26.jpg

• Nomination City tunnels tourist route in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed areas --Christian Ferrer 08:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian Ferrer --MB-one 20:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 14:38, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris,_Notre_Dame_--_2014_--_1494.jpg

• Nomination Detail of the roof of Notre-Dame, Paris, France --XRay 06:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  Rather green. Mattbuck 22:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Fixed Thanks. It's not easy to see.--XRay 08:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced this is QI. Mattbuck 21:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  Let's ask for another opion.--XRay 07:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Weak  Support I've seen worse --Livioandronico2013 08:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support. Why should it not be QI? -- Spurzem 21:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because the spire is really too dark, and above all, the right pinnacle is leaning in too strongly.--Jebulon 19:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC) (correction:seen the spire today twice, and it is really dark...--Jebulon 21:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC))
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. Too too dark--Lmbuga 17:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 09:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)