Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 17 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:King_Henrys_Road,_London_(LRM_20240515_134252).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination King Henry's Road in the Borough of Camden, Greater London --MB-one 08:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Overprocessed or oversharpened. --Sebring12Hrs 09:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done should be better now --MB-one 19:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO overprocessed, probably AI-processed by the smartphone, the trees are just green areas etc. --Plozessor 05:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It was processed from RAW in Lightroom, not by the smartphone. --MB-one 16:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Ok, still it was taken with a smartphone, so one way or the other it had to be processed to compensate for the small sensor (but the result is still below the QI bar for me). Also, that camera has 50 MP but the picture has only 12 MP; was it cropped or downscaled? --Plozessor 03:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Good Point @Plozessor: It seems, that the image prozessor is downscaling by default to 12 MPix. I can select "50 Mpix" in the camera app, but then I wont get a raw file only HEIF. Thank you for your input. --MB-one 07:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:46, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Buckingham_Palace_and_the_Victoria_Memorial_seen_from_The_Mall,_2024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Buckingham Palace and the Victoria Memorial seen from The Mall, 2024. --Hotolmo22 23:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Verticals on the right are leaning to the left. Perspective correction needed. --Milseburg 09:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Can you tell me how I can solve the problem? --Hotolmo22 13:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
You need a software to fix it. Photoshop do it. I don't know what free software can do it. When taking the photo, make sure there is enough space around the edges. --Milseburg 16:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I'll try to fix it --Hotolmo22 15:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done --Hotolmo22 21:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done No, you just rotated, I guess. The laterne on the right ist still tilted as the fassade behind. You can't solve it by rotation, because then the fassade on the left becomes tilted. --Milseburg 09:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
I hope it's okay now --Hotolmo22 20:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
 Weak support Better, not perfect, but good enough for QI, I guess. --Milseburg 19:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
I tried to edit the photo. Let me know --Hotolmo22 00:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness and perspective are not good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective might be acceptable but overall quality is not enough. Not sharp, halos around objects, too dark, etc. --Plozessor 05:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

File:At_Chicago_2024_016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination LaSalle (CTA) station, Chicago --Mike Peel 08:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Detail is too low --Poco a poco 09:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition and detail enough for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 07:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There seems to be adequate detail for a shot in difficult conditions, but if you take a closer look then it's apparently AI-generated (see the text on signs etc). --Plozessor 07:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
    • @Plozessor: No AI was used, beyond whatever Apple builds into its phones that can't be turned off... Thanks. Mike Peel 16:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes, that's what I meant. Still, I think that a QI should show reality, not how AI thinks reality would look like. I've said that before, but it's simply hard to take QI with smartphones in non-perfect light conditions. --Plozessor 09:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Assumption_of_the_Blessed_Virgin_Mary_church_in_Castel_d'Ario_(8).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bell tower of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Castel d'Ario, Lombardy, Italy. --Tournasol7 05:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose bad perspective? --GiovanniPen 11:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Bad perspective ? I don't see any issue. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Strong distorsion due to heavy perspective correction. --Benjism89 17:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 14:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Bergamo_-_Rocca_di_Bergamo_-_2023-10-29_4550.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rocca di Bergamo at night. --C messier 19:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose blurred flag --GiovanniPen 11:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Long exposure by night, it's absolutely normal. --Sebring12Hrs 07:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Unless you have 50K€ equipment, you need long exposure for a decent night shot, but then the flag moves. That is ok. --Plozessor 11:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Really? --GoldenArtists 13:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others. The blurred flag even gives something extra to this picture IMO. --Benjism89 17:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --MB-one 14:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Hassan_Tower_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hassan Tower in Rabat, Morocco -- IssamBarhoumi 10:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Top crop is a bit too tight in my opinion, and the image is underexposed. --Benjism89 14:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree with benjism --GiovanniPen 10:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done dear GiovanniPen and Benjism89 I improved the light but for the crop I can not do better --IssamBarhoumi 01:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
    • The exposition is better, thanks. But the crop top is still an issue to me, and the sharpness and noise are borderline. --Benjism89 09:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 14:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Kirche „Aya Yani“ -- 2024 -- 0814.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of St. John (Aya Yani) on Burgazada (Princes' Islands) --A. Öztas 00:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too distorted, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'd skew it a bit (make it lower on the left side). Overall it is not bad. --Plozessor 16:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I won't make any further perspective corrections here, as the object has straight lines and is very close to the church or depicts it from this perspective with this focal length of 12 mm. If it's promoted as QI, it is - if not, it's not. I like it how it is and I'm happy with it. --A. Öztas 17:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me as it is. Picture was taken from maximum distance possible. --Plozessor 03:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --MB-one 14:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Torba_-_Monastero_0071.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Torba Abbey in Gornate Olona, Italy. --Phyrexian 06:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose At the limit in sharpness. I ask for more opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 10:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Borderline sharpness indeed, @Phyrexian: maybe you can sharpen it a bit more. --Plozessor 16:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

File:SW_Padum_Market_Reru_Road_Zanskar_Jun24_A7CR_01086.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Street scenes near market, NPD Road heading south, Padum --Tagooty 01:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Leaning out of the left side, otherwise good. --Plozessor 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
@Plozessor: ✓ Done Please see new version --Tagooty 05:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
 Support Thx, good now! --Plozessor 16:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Personality rights warning --GiovanniPen 10:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  • @GiovanniPen: ✓ Done Thanks for pointing this out. I've added PR template. Please review. --Tagooty 09:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --MB-one 14:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Bergamo_-_Cappella_Colleoni_-_2023-10-29_4469.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The facade of the Colleoni Chapel, Bergamo, at night. --C messier 19:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unfortunately too grainy because of the high ISO --Michielverbeek 19:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Can be denoised, if C messier has the RAW file the result will be better, another oportunity --Ezarate 20:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version --C messier 11:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support ok now --Ezarate 22:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --MB-one 14:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)