Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 14 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Roc_de_Chère_-_227.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination North slope in the roc de Chère, since lake Annecy in Talloires, France. --Medium69 09:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Tilted --Pudelek 11:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment ✓ Done @Pudelek: I fixed tilt.--Medium69 14:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
    ok --Pudelek (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok now. --Smial 08:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Albert Memorial London July 2015-2a.jpg

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination Yiu are right, thanks. Alvesgaspar 17:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santamartamys,_David_Valle_Martinez.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Scientific illustration of mammal Santamartamys, rodent rarely sighted. Their habitat lies in the nature reserve located in the Sierra de Santa María, Bogotá (Colombia). Appears to be comfortable at altitudes of 1000 to 2300 meters with a moist environment and moderate temperatures.Illustration made with ocher stain for background, colored pencils and digital retouching. With the advice of Alistair Ian Spearing Ortiz scientific translator.Sources:Patterson, B. & Lacher, T. 2011. Santamartamys rufodorsalis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/summary/6664/0>Red-crested tree rat (Santamartamys rufodorsalis) Wildsreen ArkiveSpectacular Mammal Rediscovered after 113 Years - First Ever Photographs Taken; Bogotá, 18 May 2011. By User:David Valle Martínez --Lepsyleon 08:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not eligible, not a work of a wikipedian wikimedian. --C messier 15:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Marking for discussion because I am not familiar so much with this rule. -- RaboKarbakian 16:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  • See Commons:QIC#Creator. --C messier 16:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:A_Common_Blue_-_Polyommatus_icarus_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A male Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus). Espiye - Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support OK Charlesjsharp 13:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it is much too noisy. --Hockei 19:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Didn't see the noise. Saw some remnants of spider webs on the flowers, but no noise. Pretty butterfly. -- RaboKarbakian 05:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 Question Sorry, but what kind of monitor do you have? When you say you can live with the noise that would be OK, but that you don't see it I don't understand. --Hockei 12:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Nope, don't see the noise. Looked in the dark parts and elsewhere. Where is it, exactly? -- RaboKarbakian 21:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
You are talking about the noise in the bokeh? -- RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I found some similar "noise" on the left side of File:2015.07.11.-04-Mulde Eilenburg--Gemeine Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg -- RaboKarbakian 21:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me --Hubertl 07:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not becaus of the slight noise in the background but because the subject is not sharp enough. Alvesgaspar 23:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info I've revoked my vote because I'll discontinue my activities in QIC. --Hockei 06:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Isn't there a rule that once you start at QI you can never leave? I am pretty sure it is there.... -- RaboKarbakian 16:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
You can withdraw at any time. The bot will move then this part into the daily archive. --Hubertl 16:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is indeed somewhat noisy. In addition, the resolution is rather low. It's a pity, since the composition is very good. The lens used (Canon EF 100-400mm L IS II) should be pretty good for this type of shot thanks to its pretty short minimum focusing distance so I'd expect the sharpness to be a bit better. As a side note, the other 5 pictures uploaded with this have rather arbitrary and very different white balance. It would be better to keep things consistent I think. Dllu 19:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:China_Tianjin_5227596_(04).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Historic vase in the Nankai district in Tianjin, old city --Ermell 21:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} I disagree. tilted ccw, not centered --Hubertl 07:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment
    Tried to fix as good as possible but the stand is crooked.--Ermell 08:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Fixing tilt is ok, but IMO the non centered version is quite balanced and more interesting --Ajepbah 18:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me now --Hubertl 07:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- DerFussi 14:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry to row against the current guys, but the tight crop is a big minus. Alvesgaspar 21:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Feu_d'artifice_-_283.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fireworks in Annecy, France. --Medium69 08:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • {{s}} Good quality.--Ermell 09:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharp and nice but, sorry, too tight at top to be QI IMO--Lmbuga 16:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree -- DerFussi 14:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)