Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 13 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Feu_d'artifice_-_285.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fireworks in Annecy, France. --Medium69 10:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{s}} good quality Ficilbotoe95 13:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Striked, Confirmed sock account --Hubertl 14:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharp and nice but, sorry, too tight at top to be QI IMO--Lmbuga 16:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support crop is not perfect, but sufficient for QI. --MB-one 11:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Chalk-browed_mockingbird_(Mimus_saturninus).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Chalk-browed mockingbird (Mimus saturninus), Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 09:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 09:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too strong jepg artifacts, no detail on feathers. --Kadellar 18:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The camera's sensor appears to have two different noise levels, a lower one (besides some VLF-noise) for the blurred background and an irritating higher one for the details in the foreground. -- Smial 11:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment No it doesn't - the image has just been badly processed! Charlesjsharp 11:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good depth of field. --Elrond 17:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm with the oppsers. detail is affected by artifacts and noise. Alvesgaspar 21:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Granada Spain Alhambra-Palacio-de-los-Leones-02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Granada, Spain: Ceiling of the Hall of the Ambassadors in the Palacio de Comares (Alhambra) --Cccefalon 06:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have two concerns, one about the white balance which looks wrong if I remember well, and the other about the strong overexposure below (I can live with). I wish a discussion please.--Jebulon 15:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment By the way, it is not the ceiling of the hall of the Ambassadors, but the one of the room of the Abencerrages, if I'm not wrong (cat. corrected). Anyway, what a wow !--Jebulon 15:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you, Jebulon. For the white balance you are right and I uploaded a new version which takes into consideration the tungsten illumination . For the highlights in the windows: Pse take into consideration, that in 2010, HDR was not standard and the area is quite small. --Cccefalon 18:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Solution: a clean and careful clone.--Jebulon 09:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I thought, you can live with it --Cccefalon 11:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, in 2010 !--Jebulon 20:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate left crop. --Iifar 09:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree Iifar. Really the unfortunate left crop and therefore asymmetric composition. Sorry. -- DerFussi 14:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)