Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Djebel_Ayachi,_Eastern_High_Atlas,_Morocco_By_Mounir_NEDDI1.jpg

[edit]

  • Hi, I'm not joking, I'll move the image to the discussion. Thanks for your review.--User:Mounir Neddi 21:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Clear chromatic aberrations. Also quite grainy.--Peulle 07:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. For explanation, @Mounir Neddi: , [here] is an enlarged excerpt of your picture. The red and green fringes are chromatic aberrations from your lens, the stones do NOT look like that in reality. This must be fixed during raw conversion (the tools usually have options for that). --Plozessor 10:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
  • It's clear now, thanks for the explanation Plozessor .--Mounir Neddi 10:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Elevation_of_Pastoral_Institute_St_Pius_X_in_St._Cajetan_Church,_Goa.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Elevation of Pastoral Institute St Pius X --I.Mahesh 15:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GiovanniPen 09:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree. Not sharp out of the center and overexposed sky. --Phyrexian 07:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Phyrexian.--Peulle 09:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Torino_-_Palazzo_Siccardi_0196.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Frescos in Palazzo Siccardi in Turin, Italy. --Phyrexian 00:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose a little dark, disturbing object on the right and it should be sharpened a bit --MB-one 08:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose could be ok but crop the dark thing on the right --GiovanniPen 10:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Not sure why this ended up here without any opposing or supporting vote. In any case, perspective must be corrected and the black object at the right side must either be retouched or cropped away. Until then  Oppose. --Plozessor 16:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Ferrari_296_GTB_IMG_8865_(cropped).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ferrari 296 GTB in Böblingen --Alexander-93 08:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cropped too tightly, roof has little contrast to the background, background overall doesn't fit, lower part of the rear and rear wheel are too dark. In my opinion, it's not a quality image, so please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The background isn't the best, but IMHO, not distracting enough to disqualify the image on composition grounds. --C messier 08:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

File:BMW_Z3_M_(E36-8)_IMG_8842.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination BMW Z3 M (E36-8) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 08:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cropped too tightly and the windows look very milky. The surroundings in which the car was photographed are not unusual, but they are not attractive. Please discuss whether the photo is still a QI. ---- Spurzem 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The crop leaves sufficient breathing room IMO.--MB-one 08:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Lüneburg_Am_Stintmarkt_7_001_2024_04_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Residential building, 16th until 20th century, portal --F. Riedelio 06:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose The bottom is really unsharp. Feel free to send it to CR. --Sebring12Hrs 06:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Not the best sharpness, but sharp enough for QI as I think -- Spurzem 09:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose For me, sharpness is just under the bar. --Plozessor 04:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Improved. --F. Riedelio 09:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me.. --JiriMatejicek 09:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Under the bar for me. It's daytime and the image should be sharper.--Peulle 10:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 09:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)