Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 10 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Perpustakaan_Sultan_Abdul_Samad_(facade),_UPM.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Library of Universiti Putra Malaysia --Wee Hong 15:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perspective correction needed --Mike Peel 18:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
    • @Wee Hong: Are you able to try applying perspective correction to this? I think it's good except for that. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --GiovanniPen 09:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose PC is needed from that POV. Please discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 13:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs PC. --Plozessor 07:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

File:SE_Facade_Stakrimo_Zanskar_Jun24_A7CR_01111.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination South-east facade of the main building, entrance to the old prayer hall, Stakrimo Gompa, Zanskar --Tagooty 00:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Vertical perspective distortion, fixable? --F. Riedelio 12:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: The location did not allow me to move further back, this is the best PC I could do without cropping the roof. --Tagooty 11:01, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@Tagooty: ✓ Answered You can transform the photo vertically and change the aspect ratio so that the roof remains completely. --F. Riedelio 08:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio:
✓ Done Thanks for the hint. I used Gimp Transform. Please review the new version. --Tagooty 10:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: Please see new version --Tagooty 05:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's leaning to the right at left. --Sebring12Hrs 07:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but with that distortion it simply doesn't look good. Also the object is in shadow while the background is bright and sunlit. --Plozessor 08:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Monasterio_de_Căpriana,_Căpriana,_Moldavia,_2023-11-02,_DD_39.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova --Poco a poco 07:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 22:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Quality is good, but the upper part looks distorted and unnatural - like it's turned out - due to perspective correction. --Екатерина Борисова 01:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Upper part is distorted because the photo was taken from a short distance, but IMO still within the range that we usually accept. --Plozessor 04:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It doesn't look like the cause of the distortion is shooting from a short distance. Short distance shooting makes a building look tilted but never unnatural. However, I know that many people here are much more interested in verticals than naturalness. -- Екатерина Борисова 18:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment In my opinion, a tilted building is not more natural than an overcorrected-perpective building. --Sebring12Hrs 10:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Tournasol7 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose While this photo is better than most of the phallic-looking perspective-corrected close-ups of the churches, it's still looking weird for me. I'd support it if the photo would be taken from a bit larger distance (because owerall execution is excellent) but this is a no for me, sorry. Красный 14:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Красный. --Smial 12:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Since the top molding is round rather than straight like at the bottom, the distortion is tolerable to me. If straight lines were being distorted that might be a bigger problem in my mind. (I rarely vote here, but am voting since I posted two nominations on this page).-TonyTheTiger 13:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is good for illustration, but not a QI; looks like Escher paintings. Lvova 19:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 10:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)