Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 08 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Alpine resort Gazprom in Krasnaya Polyana.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Alpine resort Gazprom in Krasnaya Polyana.jpg. --Sergei Kazantsev 17:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Colors look oversaturated --Uoaei1 05:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Actually I didn't change a saturation. These are natural colors. Illusion of oversaturation arises because of domination of green color in object (trees, the wood, roofs). Thanks for reviewing--Sergei Kazantsev 15:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok --Uoaei1 17:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Saturation is ok. But the verticals are leaning out. Please correct the perspective; I will revoke my oppose after that. --Cccefalon 13:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--Sergei Kazantsev 15:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
    • With your last edit you destroyed your image: First you applied saturation and now it is oversaturated. Second you did a layer shift/rotate in PS and you got blank leftovers top left and whole border. Third: by shifting, the top space is too small for the spire. --Cccefalon 07:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
      Thanks for remarks and comments. Please, look at the new version. --Sergei Kazantsev 18:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
      • Saturation: ✓ Done. Top left corner: ✓ Done. Space over spire: ✓ Done. Bottom line:  Not done (2 pixel white border still left) --Cccefalon 06:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
        @Cccefalon. "2 pixel white border still left". It is higher than my opportunities to find these 2 pixels. You where couldn't show it? --Sergei Kazantsev 06:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
        • Oh come on, you can see the ragged bottom line in the preview commons page with every browser. And when you open the full size resolution in browser, you can see the fine white line at the bottom. I don't know if it is 2 or 3 or 4 pixels, but it is a flaw. --Cccefalon 14:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done 3 pixels at the bottom cut off. Better? --Sergei Kazantsev 07:43, 6 October 2015
          • Yes, it is ok now. I revoke my oppose. --Cccefalon 19:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nissan_MID4_II_front-left_2015_Motorsport_Japan.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Motorsport Japan 2015: 1987 Nissan MID4 II. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good enough quality. --Dllu 02:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too tight crop and no good perspective. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 15:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to short focal length --Ralf Roletschek 00:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop is ok for me.--Ermell 19:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nissan_MID4_front-left_2015_Motorsport_Japan.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Motorsport Japan 2015: 1985 Nissan MID4. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good enough quality. --Dllu 02:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too tight crop and no good perspective. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 15:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to short focal length --Ralf Roletschek 00:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop is ok for me.--Ermell 19:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 23:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)