Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 18 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Amanda_Palmer_Open_Piano_for_Refugees_Vienna_2019_06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Amanda Palmer, live open air in Vienna. --Tsui 02:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Can you crop the 2 items in the foreground at the bottom? --Poco a poco 07:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'd rather not. The head/hair and the piano were part of the setting there, the latter also explanining her pose (raised shoulder/arms, bent back). If it's disturbing I'd rather withdraw this or accept a decline. --Tsui 17:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed, it's disturbing to me, please, let's discuss and find a CR. --Poco a poco 10:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too disturbing, I fear, just as with my own photo.--Peulle 08:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question - What's the bright thing in the lower left in front of her right side? -- Ikan Kekek 09:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • That must be some hair of a person in front. --Granada 12:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I like this photo. -- Spurzem 19:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support nice. --Ralf Roletschek 01:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Very shallow DoF with focus right where it belongs. Whatever surrounds it does not really matter. --Axel 13:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Gruber-Hirnkogel_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Summit cross at Vorderer Hirnkogel, Styria --Clemens Stockner 18:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Good focus to main object, but the backpack is unfortunately spoiling the composition --Michielverbeek 19:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Overall good enough for QI. Let´s discuss. --Milseburg 19:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree with Michiel. The backpack is very distracting, and the photo isn't presented as a view of the cross and backpack. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I did not place it there on purpose, so the backpack kind of provides authenticity. I did not go up without it. --Clemens Stockner 10:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good technical quality with a minor composition issue. Matter of taste, not of quality. For sure not a FPC, but of course a QI. --Smial 13:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Whether the backpack bothers or not is really a matter of taste. Maybe he should express that the ascent is done. -- Spurzem 23:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - You folks make a good point. I withdraw my opposing vote. However, I don't know what the accurate vote count would be. I think Michielverbeek opposed. -- Ikan Kekek 09:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support der Rucksack stört nicht, er paßt ins Bild. --Ralf Roletschek 01:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have opposed this photo because of the composition. When I take a photo I am always caring a (small) backpack, but you never see this on my photos. Nice to read that a backpack is not always spoiling the photo. --Michielverbeek 21:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I keep coming back to look at this image, and I have to say that the backpack does detract from the view of the natural scene and the outline of the man-made structure. (I found the same problem when I was about to nominate my picture of a tomb and found a rogue sock sat in the shadows at its base, so abandoned the nomination.)--Bobulous 19:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support This cross stands without backpack most of the time. In terms of authenticity of the main object, I'd prefer the image without backpack. However, this is a usability, not a quality issue. --Axel 12:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)