Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Morning_Glory_Pool_Yellowstone_NP_Wyoming_2024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Morning Glory Pool hot spring in Yellowstone National Park Wyoming --Nv8200pa 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Bad crop, low res, CA --Poco a poco 18:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Low res? The original file is 3,001 × 2,000 pixels, file size: 7.28 MB. Bad crop? Compare to File:Morning Glory Pool 2017 02.jpg, File:Morning Glory Pool 2017 06.jpg and File:Morning Glory Pool 2017 03.jpg (imo are badly cropped} which are quality images. What does the resolution need to be and what would be a better crop? Nv8200pa 12:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Resolution is IMO ok. But the left and right edges are cropped off. Also it would look better with perspective correction, but such is not possible because of the tight crop. --Plozessor 05:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Almost all recent images (~100) in the CAT crop the pool. I suppose the viewpoint from the boardwalk does not allow a full view. This image was taken with a 12mm lens. I find the very minor crops to be acceptable.
  •  Oppose CA and scaled down to a quarter of the sensor's resolution. I have no objection to a certain amount of downscaling if difficult shooting conditions or perspective corrections make this necessary. But if photos in native sensor resolution are rejected here because they are not pixel sharp right down to every corner of the image, I think it would be very unfair to promote this candidate. --Smial 14:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CAs everywhere... Come on... --Sebring12Hrs 00:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

File:ARINA_HENDRIKA,_Cargo_ship,_ENI_02203863,_MMSI_244131479._15-07-2024._(actm.)_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination ARINA HENDRIKA Cargo ship, ENI 02203863, MMSI 244131479. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Reluctantly opposed. Sharp but light is not the best and there is background clutter that does not show the ship well. To better isolate the ship, suggest you find a bridge (or any other high perspective) that overlooks the canal (minimizes background clutter) and use a longer lens (100mm – 150mm) to shorten the length on these long barge ships. --GRDN711 17:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately must agree with GRDN711, the ship doesn't stand out from the background. Also the shadows are pretty noisy. --Plozessor 16:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Zaouiat_Moulay_Abdeslam,_Tizguite_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The shrine of the righteous saint Sidi Abdel Salam bin Muhammad Al-Yaqoubi Al-Walani, in the village of Zawiya Sidi Abdel Salam near the Moroccan city of Ifrane. --User:Mounir Neddi 13:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Leaning in on the right, needs PC --Plozessor 04:34, 2 November 2024
  •  Comment Reason for request: The request was archived before the discussion was completed. --User:Mounir Neddi 20:22, 05 Nov 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's still leaning in on the right side (less than before though), but now it's also leaning in on the left side, and it's darker than before (too dark). --Plozessor 03:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's not sharp enough and the sky is almost blown out and has jpeg artifacts. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)