Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 11 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination The Xianling mausoleum where the Hongxi emperor was buried. --Charlie fong 00:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 42 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 43-44 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Good quality image. --Tsui 02:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gargoyle, Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling of Sala dos Cisnes, Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gruta dos Banhos, Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Too bad you couldn't get them to take away the red rope for the picture, but definitely an excellent QI. -- Ikan Kekek 01:09, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abandoned Kasbah in Ouarzazate. By User:Farajiibrahim --Reda benkhadra 18:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurry, far from QI --Poco a poco 18:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tamengoult Kasbah. By User:Farajiibrahim --Reda benkhadra 18:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurry --Poco a poco 18:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination El Jadida Port. By User:AMINE BOURHILI --Reda benkhadra 18:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Low cquality, noisy, unsharp, no details --Michielverbeek 19:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lmbat Monastery in Shirak province, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 16:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow mignonette (Reseda lutea) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front view of a small vehicle for mobile sale in Cotonou --Adoscam 10:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Counterclockwise tilt, distortion and poor processing --George Chernilevsky 11:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination First stone construction project teacher's office at the University of Abomey-Calavi-Benin --Adoscam 10:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Distortion and poor processing --George Chernilevsky 11:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sněžka (Śnieżka, Schneekoppe), Krkonoše mountains. View from the Czech side --Pudelek 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Dust spots on the sky --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Corrected --Pudelek 14:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Now good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Luční bouda (Wiesenbaude), Krkonoše mountains --Pudelek 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall mounted air conditioning condenser --Adoscam 10:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unsharp and noisy, sorry --George Chernilevsky 11:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco in the ceiling of Michaels church in Salzburg --Isiwal 09:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Klagenfurt am Wörthersee in Carinthia, street view the Alter Platz with the Bürgerhaus --Michielverbeek 08:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 10:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Klagenfurt am Wörthersee in Carinthia, street view the Neuer Platz with Rathaus --Michielverbeek 08:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oskar Schindler's Emalia factory in Kraków. By User:Boston9 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OK-XIG (aircraft). By User:Julian Herzog --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nave of the Buon Pastore church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wreck of a Kramer KS 511 loader --Ermell 07:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Combine harvester at the grain harvest in Upper Franconia --Ermell 07:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 16:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination E-bike charging station in Haßfurt --Ermell 07:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mailbox and public telephone in Haßfurt --Ermell 07:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination VR Bank Weimar at Dingelstedt Straße 2 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Rodez Cathedral, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good qality --Llez 07:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolnosci Square 2 in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. --Tournasol7 07:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the facade of the Buon Pastore church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Buon Pastore church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dominique Bourg en dédicace à l'issue d'une conférence au collège Sabine Zlatin à Belley en novembre 2019. --Benoît Prieur 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Waasen" in Großweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Out of focus. Sorry. --Ermell 07:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Weathered old wooden door of a House on Plaz in Vnà.
--Famberhorst 06:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Weathered old wooden door of a House on Plaz in Vnà.
-
- Nomination Drenched (Clitocybe nebularis) in decay.
--Famberhorst 06:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Drenched (Clitocybe nebularis) in decay.
-
- Nomination Mountain tour from Prümaran Prui via Alp Laret to Ftan. View of the surrounding mountains.
--Famberhorst 06:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour from Prümaran Prui via Alp Laret to Ftan. View of the surrounding mountains.
-
- Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
--Famberhorst 06:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
-
- Nomination Courtyard of the niveau 3, Fort Libéria, France --Llez 05:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the wall of the niveau 1 on the niveau 2 with the casern for the soldiers, Fort Libéria, France --Llez 05:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Access to the Fort Libéria, Villefranche-de-Conflent, France --Llez 05:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Small city gate in the northern city wall of Villefranche-de-Conflent with the Fort Libéria in the background, France --Llez 05:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
-
- Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Church of San Güerg Lavin.Wall decoration.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Church of San Güerg Lavin.Wall decoration.
-
- Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Horses on the Alp Sesvenna.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Horses on the Alp Sesvenna.
-
- Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
-
- Nomination Castle Rosegg, Rosegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pediment at the south facade of castle Rosegg, Rosegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Rosegg, Rosegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1950 Dodge Wayfarer Sportabout --Mr.choppers 03:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rebenblätter im Herbst, an der Deutschen Weinstrasse, Rheinland-Pfalz,--Fischer.H 16:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice autumn leaves --Michielverbeek 18:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Historic (listed) buildings in the Freilichtmuseum Beuren, Germany. --Aristeas 10:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 10:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moated castle and park in Oppenweiler, Germany. --Aristeas 10:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of ND d'Aurinques in Aurillac, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Our Lady of the Snow church of Aurillac, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cage thistle (Atractylis cancellata) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nahe river at Oberhausen -- Jacquesverlaeken 21:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A fisheye view of the interior of the Pisa Baptistery --Spike 21:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Stitching error (see note). --Tsungam 07:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Was not able to fix the stitching error on the right. Original images must have too much parallax error. Spike 00:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Main nave of the Sant'Agata church in Brescia. --Moroder 17:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Holy Mother of God Cathedral. Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia. By User:Armenak Margarian --Արման Բարսեղյան 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Internal service roads in Ayatana resort, Coorg -- IM3847 12:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Vegetation on the top of Waterfalls near Ayatana resort, Coorg -- IM3847 12:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
Consensual review
[edit]File:ES-ACB.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nordica aircraft at Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport. By User:XDominik113x --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Looks blurred, not really sharp. --Gyrostat 09:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Support I think it is sharp enough. Please let's discuss. -- Spurzem 15:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Spurzem. -- Ikan Kekek 10:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Support per Spurzem. --Smial 12:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I must admit that I don't understand. The focus is soft and no detail is sharp on the fuselage of the aircraft. Imho, this image falls short of the guidelines for QI. Gyrostat 13:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 01:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Women_in_Architecture_Guggenheim_Logo-es.svg
[edit]- Nomination Logo para la Editatón en la Mujeres en la Arquitectura --Ezarate 00:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I don't see why this simple text should get QI status --Podzemnik 01:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support I don't see why it should not. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose agree Podzemnik. undefined 22:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Too simple. --Milseburg (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think QI is for this sort of thing, but in any case the kerning's not quite right for a QI. Rodhullandemu 11:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 01:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Bangladesh_international_school_dammam_school_image.jpg
[edit]- Nomination previously the reason was that the image wasn't from an appropriate angle(it is ok angle) and blurred plates isn't manipulating
- Decline The image if the school -BISD --MRC2RULES 12:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose It was nominated before. No changes. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose and manipulated number plates --Ralf Roletschek 14:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose That's the second nomination of this image between a few days. But it is not improved. It still looks like the buildings are tilting backwards. -- Spurzem 08:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, massive compression artifacts, way too small for an easy to take image. --Smial 10:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle 08:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 01:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Mercedes-Benz_SSKL,_Bj._1931_(2008-06-28)_ret.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mercedes-Benz SSKL from 1931 in the historic paddock of Nürburgring -- Spurzem 13:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Color balance should be corrected. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 19:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
@Andrew J.Kurbiko: What's happening? Can you also express yourself a bit more clearly? -- Spurzem 00:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is faded and low contrast. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Weißabgleich ist ok. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
OpposeNice car, but there are lots of masking errors between the main motif and the digitally blurred background, visible even without pixel peeping. In addition, remnants of CA can be seen at the rear. Also, per Andrew: Wheels look faded, have low local contrast. This seems unbalanced compared to other dark areas. --Smial 14:57, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Smial: Vielleicht sollte ich mich wirklich darauf beschränken, in Zukunft nur noch mitzujubeln, wenn hier wieder einmal wie so oft über- oder unterbelichteter und total verzerrter Murks hochgejubelt wird, Autos mit Plakaten in den Windschutzscheiben und evtl. Personen mit Picknickkörben und abgeschnittenen Köpfen dahinter. Fürs Erste ziehe ich schon mal diesen Vorschlag zurück. Vielen Dank für Deine Bewertung. -- Spurzem 15:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Lothar, ich glaube, meine Bewertung hier in diesem Fall ist nicht ungerecht. Bei den reihenweise durchgewunkenen Ausstellungsfotos mit unsäglicher Beleuchtung und Gestaltung bin ich völlig bei dir, aber ich habe aufgegeben, dagegen anzustänkern, einfach schon, weil es mir als Stalking ausgelegt werden könnte. Eventuell versuchst du es noch einmal mit weicherem (und genauerem) Übergang bei der Maske? Das Auto selbst ist ja, wie bei dir üblich, typgerecht und vorteilhaft abgebildet. --Smial 17:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Smial: Nachdem ich mir das vorgestellte Bild noch mal ganz groß anschaute, muss ich zugeben: Du hast recht. Ich habe es deshalb noch einmal bearbeitet; mal sehen, ob es jetzt gefällt. Gleichzeitig mache ich den Rückzug vom Rückzug und sehe der Kritik ins Auge. Gruß -- Spurzem 22:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Lothar, ich glaube, meine Bewertung hier in diesem Fall ist nicht ungerecht. Bei den reihenweise durchgewunkenen Ausstellungsfotos mit unsäglicher Beleuchtung und Gestaltung bin ich völlig bei dir, aber ich habe aufgegeben, dagegen anzustänkern, einfach schon, weil es mir als Stalking ausgelegt werden könnte. Eventuell versuchst du es noch einmal mit weicherem (und genauerem) Übergang bei der Maske? Das Auto selbst ist ja, wie bei dir üblich, typgerecht und vorteilhaft abgebildet. --Smial 17:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Smial: Vielleicht sollte ich mich wirklich darauf beschränken, in Zukunft nur noch mitzujubeln, wenn hier wieder einmal wie so oft über- oder unterbelichteter und total verzerrter Murks hochgejubelt wird, Autos mit Plakaten in den Windschutzscheiben und evtl. Personen mit Picknickkörben und abgeschnittenen Köpfen dahinter. Fürs Erste ziehe ich schon mal diesen Vorschlag zurück. Vielen Dank für Deine Bewertung. -- Spurzem 15:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me, IMO the blurred background is an acceptable technique, as long as the main motif is in focus. --Palauenc05 07:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I disagree. Blurred background here is unnecessary, it reduces the quality of the image. So Oppose for now. Masum Reza📞 10:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Masumrezarock100: I know we have many quality images of cars with clearly identifiable people in the background or next to them, some at the picnic, others with their heads cut off, sometimes a dumpster is in sharp focus, and so on. Of course, the car is also recognizable. Whether such pictures are really the better, is an open question. It's a matter of taste. Nevertheless, thank you for your expert judgment. -- Spurzem 11:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Support. I am basically not happy with strong image editing, but here the new revision is "good enough". --Smial 10:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Very good work. Of course QI forr me. --Steindy 20:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Support No masterpiece of masking technique but just o.k.--Ermell 07:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 01:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Waterfalls_near_Ayatana_resort,_Coorg_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Waterfalls near Ayatana resort, Coorg -- IM3847 12:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 14:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Not good enough for me. --Tournasol7 15:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Seems OK for a 6-second exposure of a waterfall. Parts of the photo are very dark, but that just highlights the waterfall more. -- Ikan Kekek 07:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose nice image, but I can't see one really sharp area. --Carschten 11:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Carschten.--Ermell 07:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 01:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_6.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)- I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 18:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Leaning out.--Ermell 23:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)- Done Perspective corr. --Manfred Kuzel 08:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --Aristeas 06:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support problem solved.--Ermell 07:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 01:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)