Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 07 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Martin at Lind, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman stone relief of a couple, citizens of the Roman Empire, (CSIR II/2, 149) of Virunum II cemetery on Zollfeld, set up at the southern exterior wall of the parish church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marble church monument («Keutschacher epitaph») with the coronation of Mary (donation by archbishop Leonard of Keutschach) at the southern exterior wall of the parish church, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fleuron and croquets at the northern portal's of the parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carriage to kingdom come, taking a soul to the other world (CSIR II/4, 399), Roman epitaph of Virunum II cemetery (Zollfeld nearby), exposed at the southern exterior wall of the parish church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crystal Bivouac, West Coast Region --Podzemnik 01:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crystal Bivouac, West Coast Region --Podzemnik 01:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santa Bárbara, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 00:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Jesús, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 00:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Jesús, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 00:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception, Barichara, Colombia --Bgag 00:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cheverny-Chateau façade frontale (by Jean-Christophe BENOIST) --Sebring12Hrs 22:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality image. Building is completely in focus. --Neb.st 02:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Francisco Ferry Building. --King of Hearts 22:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi Q3 Sportback in Böblingen --Alexander-93 19:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lunden (1921). --Palauenc05 17:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Michael's Tower, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 12:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture in the park of Grassalkovich Palace, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 12:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grassalkovich Palace, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 12:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Tagooty 14:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue Church, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 12:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Lovely church, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Wildeshausen (1921). --Palauenc05 09:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortress wall. Derbent citadel "Naryn-Kala". A UNESCO world heritage site. Derbent, Dagestan --Александр Байдуков 08:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to the island of the Krestovka river: across the arm of the Krestovka river, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 08:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Pen-Hir point in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Lacks sharpness IMHO, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 14:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint-Michel chapel in Saint-Rivoal (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of Mont Provent chapel in Châtillon-sur-Cluses, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Funerary monument of the Maggi Via family. --Moroder 07:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Market fountain in Iphofen --Ermell 07:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferry Rubin at the pier in Gdansk --Ermell 07:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyards at the foot of the Pic de Vissou --Christian Ferrer 07:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and an impressive landscape. --Aristeas 07:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lectern, pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach --Llez 07:16, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Gefängnisturm and part of the castle wall of Hirschhorn Castle in Hirschhorn (Neckar), Germany. --Aristeas 07:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bronze Pietà by Ermenegildo Luppi. --Moroder 07:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Estatua de Themis, Valparaíso, Región de Valparaíso, Chile --Carlos yo 06:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Probiy waterfall on the Prut River -- George Chernilevsky 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Gymnopilus junonius.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Gymnopilus junonius.
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren. ‘artwork (Ⅲ)’. Artwork by ‘Ine Bollen. Sculptor’.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. ‘artwork (Ⅲ)’. Artwork by ‘Ine Bollen. Sculptor’.
-
- Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Waalsdorpervlakte).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Waalsdorpervlakte).
-
- Nomination Pantala flavescens --Vengolis 04:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cophinopoda,Asilidae @ Kozhikode--Vengolis 04:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cophinopoda,Asilidae @ Kozhikode--Vengolis 04:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cleome rutidosperman --Vengolis 04:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soap bubbles --XRay 04:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Probiy waterfall on the Prut River (1) -- George Chernilevsky 21:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Probiy waterfall on the Prut River (2) -- George Chernilevsky 21:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solitude Palace at sunset --Schrauber5 21:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Posterization with lost of details, noised and blown white at right on the sky. The geometry of the building is also distorted --George Chernilevsky 07:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination _Hagley_mill_race_on_Brandywine_Creek,_Delaware,_USA._--Itu_19:19,_3_November_2020_(UTC)
- Decline Oppose Ineligible as not created by a Commonist. Rodhullandemu 09:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crypt burial grounds (16-17 centuries). "Town of the dead" (ninety-five tombs): 1 km North of the village, right Bank of the Gizeldon river, North-Eastern slope of Raminy-rag mountain, Dargavs, Prigorodny district, North Ossetia --Александр Байдуков 08:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Locomotive Detail --Leonardopgentile 02:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Cesar Augusto Chirosa Horie --Jani Pereira 13:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The monastery Nilova Pustyn: the island of Stolobny front room, Ostashkovsky district, Tver oblast --Александр Байдуков 02:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
It doesn't look straight. Please check the verticals --Podzemnik 05:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Temple complex: Chernavino, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad region --Александр Байдуков 02:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Nice but way too much grass. I wish you pointed your camera a bit up --Podzemnik 05:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hamburg-Harburg, entrance to residential building Hastedtstrasse 42 (protected cultural heritage monument) --KaiBorgeest 22:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Can you remove CA and upload its full size? --Podzemnik 01:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Done --KaiBorgeest 23:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transparent water of the Karst sinkhole of the Holy spring of the Church of Paraskeva Pyatnitsa: Mshentsy, bologovsky district, Tver region --Александр Байдуков 02:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The focus plane is on the water surface. It should be further back to show more detail of the sinkhole itself --MB-one 17:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reredos church of the Jesuit College, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 14:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lighthouse in Île-de-Sein (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 07:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted, vignetting --Poco a poco 22:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Done but far (atmospheric veil). Gzen92 08:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
The contrast adjustment is ok to me but I was asking for a tilt, you just rotated the lighthouse but if you look at the water level on the right a tilt is visible --Poco a poco 19:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tic Tac Toe on a wall of a building in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Comment It lacks contrast, file description rather poor --Moroder 08:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review, image corrected and I added information I know about this subject :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:43, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Tic Tac Toe on a wall of a building in Mödlareuth. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Comment It lacks contrast, file description rather poor --Moroder 08:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inner hall Of the pavilion at the Granite pier (Pavilion under the flag): Elagin island, 4N, North-East of Elagin Palace, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 01:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
I think it need some perspective correction to improve the verticals. --Augustgeyler 21:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not done --Augustgeyler 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Cathedral_of_Our_Lady_of_the_Assumption_of_Montauban.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cathedral of Our Lady of the Assumption of Montauban, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 05:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The top of the building needs sharpening. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I disagree. --Tournasol7 08:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 05:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler --Tagooty 15:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Top of towers and facade really are blurred, especially sculptures on the top of the facade do not look well --Jakubhal 17:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Porsche_Turbo,_Techno_Classica_2018,_Essen_(IMG_0015).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Porsche 911 Turbo at Techno Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 14:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeFor a parking (not moving) vehicle I would expect more crispness and detail, sorry. --A.Savin 15:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done Reworked sharpness. One can almost read the VIN now. That should suffice for QI IMO. --MB-one 18:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Well composed, but over-processed. There is so much noise reduction now that every surface is looking very artificial, even the asphalt in front. --Augustgeyler 10:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support It's OK for me --Moroder 04:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I still suggest reducing the noise reduction. --Augustgeyler 11:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment IMHO August is right, at least the asphalt looks very artifical now; I would suggest to reduce the noise reduction. --Aristeas 12:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Now overprocessed. Full of artifacts. --Smial 12:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Btw: So wirklich verstehe ich nicht, wieso alle diese Schnappschüsse von Autos auf irgendwelchen Ausstellungen, Parkplätzem oder bei Gebrauchtwarenhändlern QI werden müssen. Ich glaube, ich muß mein persönliches Dogma, daß "Gestaltung" bei QIC ein nachrangiges Kriterium ist, dringend überdenken.
- Comment decreased global noise reduction and sharpening mask. @A.Savin: is sharpness ok for you now?--MB-one 12:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Thank you MB-one! It improved, but it is still there and the level of detail remained too low. --Augustgeyler 14:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support OK for QI now. --Aristeas 07:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support OK. --A.Savin 14:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Smart_fortwo_cabrio_Brabus,_IAA_2017,_Frankfurt_(1Y7A1899).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Smart fortwo cabrio Brabus at IAA 2017 --MB-one 12:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The car looks distorted because the windshield sinks completely into darkness. --Im Fokus 00:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done raised shadows on the windscreen --MB-one 18:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Too dark and unrealisticly distorted. -- Spurzem 08:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Question What kind of remaining distortion are you seeing? I'm tempted to support but might be missing something you've seen. -- Ikan Kekek 19:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Look at the original car than you understand what I mean with saying "unrealisticly distorted". The image is taken with a short lense from too deep position. -- Spurzem 22:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- I can't really tell from looking at image search results in duckduckgo.com. I'm confused, but I guess I'll defer to you two. -- Ikan Kekek 01:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer 07:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Rostrum_of_the_ship_on_the_Northern_Rostral_column.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rostrum of the ship on the Northern Rostral column. The old stock exchange, near Stock bridge, Vasileostrovskiy district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Please reduce the exposure correction. There is a strong halo between monument and sky. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Im Fokus 23:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Strong halo effect by overdone exposure correction --Augustgeyler 10:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Ditto. Rodhullandemu 11:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Question Same question: Where are the halos? -- Ikan Kekek 19:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 05:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder how one can not see these artefacts. I marked them at the image for convenience. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per August and Rodhullandemu; the photo is good, but please reduce the halo. --Aristeas 12:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This kind of halo doesn’t disturb me at all. I believe it’s visual phenomenon and not an artifact. --Moroder 13:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This is no "visual phenomenon". It is a processing result. --Augustgeyler 20:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It might be enhanced by increasing contrast but it's there? --Moroder 06:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Castillo_de_Bratislava,_Eslovaquia,_2020-02-01,_DD_59.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 07:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Review
- needs persp corr --Tesla Delacroix 13:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not done--Peulle 13:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Excuse me, the request came one day before you declined it. What perspective correction is being asked here? verticals look vertical to me --Poco a poco 22:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies, there was a different image I meant to decline as having not been corrected in a week.--Peulle 07:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- So let's wait here for coming improvements. --Augustgeyler (talk) 10:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- As long as I don't know what should be improve, there will be no improvements...Tesla Delacroix, can you help with that? Poco a poco 20:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- I personally see two problems: 1st, it's not exacly centered and 2nd the roof looks curved. Not sure if it's fixable, the angle was quite wideTesla Delacroix 00:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- New version uploaded...Poco a poco 19:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Btw, any other reviewers are welcome... Poco a poco 19:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It is a very very hard task to review this nomination. I think the main problem is the not centered point of view in combination with the strong perspective distortion of that lens. It gives a very artificial look and leads to an effect as if both towers were of complete different shape. I think this is unfixable – if not taking the picture again. --Augustgeyler 00:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral From a purely technical point of view, the photo is flawless. The question is whether such an extreme wide-angle perspective is appropriate for the subject in question. With a portrait photo, everyone would surely scream bloody murder because of the absurd distortion of the person depicted. Including the photographer's victim. I own a wide-angle lens myself, even if only with a not so extreme focal length of 18mm (35mm equivalent), but I rarely use it. I prefer to look for other possibilities, if necessary for a longer period of time, to adequately depict an object. A photo of a building may show falling lines, this is not a mistake in principle, but a question of conscious image design. The forced verticalisation which has been dogmatically advocated on QIC for a long time is not a model for really good architectural photography. --Smial 10:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Support I was carefully reviewing the architecture of the place, the angle and the metadata. This seems to have a slight perspective problem, but not too severe to disqualify it. The difference in the size of the towers is because in real life the towers are not the same size [1] --Wilfredor 03:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I checked it on maps and could see that the outer lines are more ore less symmetrical. The image suggests they are not. Considering all arguments of the technically well taken picture I come to the conclusion that a "natural" perspective ways most in this case which can't be achieved with that wide angle at this not centred position. --Augustgeyler 11:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- "The outer lines are more or less symmetrical" what do you mean? the building facade is not symmetrical because the left tower is wider, as Wilfredor pointed out. So to get both borders equidistant from the POV I should have gone 2 steps to the left bu then the statue would be off, which wouldn't help the composition at all IMHO Poco a poco 18:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Although the pure technical quality is really good, I think such a wide angle is not appropriate to document this building from this camera position. And perspective correction shouldn't be too extrem, because it's an artificial modification which could distort reality. --Tesla Delacroix 15:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Wilfredor. --Aristeas 12:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)