Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2016

• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 03:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion «Take Me To The Alley.» (Gregory Porter). Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 03:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion In my former life I was a grape phylloxera. So, can`t you offer me any wine? Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 03:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 03:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The TWA Flight Center at John F. Kennedy International Airport --Acroterion 03:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The TWA Flight Center at John F. Kennedy International Airport --Acroterion 03:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neumarkt bridge across the moat of Friesach, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Order church Saint Nicholas and the monastery of the Dominicans on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door handle and door knocker at the western portal of the order church Saint Nicholas on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit at the order church Saint Nicholas of the Dominicans on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace of Veitshöchheim --Haeferl 01:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exhibition room of textile museum in Haslach an der Mühl. --Haeferl 01:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Textile scissors at textile museum Haslach an der Mühl. --Haeferl 01:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Amazing those old scissors. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Pechersky Ascension Monastery --A.Savin 01:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: wooden house at Sechenova Street --A.Savin 01:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion What a document! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Church of Saint Sergius of Radonezh --A.Savin 01:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: view towards Lower embankment --A.Savin 01:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Komsomolskaya metro station --A.Savin 01:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality. --Haeferl 01:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The observation tower at Antietam National Battlefield --Acroterion 01:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Submarine M-296 (focal length 50 mm) -- George Chernilevsky 22:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Submarine M-296 (focal length 24 mm) -- George Chernilevsky 22:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Submarine M-296 (rear view) -- George Chernilevsky 22:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evang.-Luth. Parish St. Stephan in Brunn in Upper Franconia --Ermell 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Hohenpölz in Upper Franconia --Ermell 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Pfarrweisach in Lower Franconia --Ermell 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 21:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Pfarrweisach in Lower Franconia --Ermell 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eagle inn in Pfarrweisach --Ermell 20:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 21:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rough chameleon (Trioceros rudis), Rwanda --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion The Background could be better, but the chameleon is perfect and on Commons is no better picture of it. Good enough for QI. --Haeferl 20:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baumann's mountain fritillary (Issoria baumanni excelsior), Rwanda --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-eyed slaty flycatcher (Melaenornis fischeri toruensis), Rwanda --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion There is a bit of chroma noise, but not significant for promotion IMHO --Poco a poco 22:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden monkey (Cercopithecus kandti), Rwanda --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Athenians thanking Theseus after killing the Minotaure. Fresco from Pompeii. MANNaples, Italy.--Jebulon 17:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. There is a little bit of noise considering the resolution is nt extremely high, but I take it the exhibit is indoors so that's cool. --Peulle 18:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient roman equestrian statue of Marcus Nonius Balbus the Younger, found in Herculaneum. MANNaples, Italy. Transparent bg available--Jebulon 17:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Rjcastillo 17:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tea service on surtout, 18th-c., Residenz, Munich, Bavaria, Germany. Various backgrouds available, see file page.--Jebulon 17:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI enough. --Jkadavoor 03:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of king Max.I Joseph of Bavaria, Munich, Germany.--Jebulon 17:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 19:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Top of the sceptre of the St Hubert Order, Schatzkammer, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.--Jebulon 17:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hawa Khana, Puthia. By User:Maun Sarwar --Nahid.rajbd 16:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Guided waterfall on the mountain road.
    --Famberhorst 16:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fir tree (Pinus sylvestris) between flowering heather. Location, Schaopedobbe (Schapenpoel) in the Netherlands.
    --Famberhorst 16:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Military graves. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
    --Famberhorst 16:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhaponticum coniferum, in the Badaia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shelter in Urkiola. Biscay, Spain --Basotxerri 15:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 16:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Barbecue grill at the Aldazitala picnic site in Urkiola. Biscay, Spain --Basotxerri 15:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2016/Decline
• 
  Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2016/Decline
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Koropets, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 14:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neurobasis chinensis male --Jkadavoor 13:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Peulle 18:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neurobasis chinensis male cleaning his eyes. --Jkadavoor 13:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neurobasis chinensis female --Jkadavoor 13:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Bit on the dark side, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flags outside Göteborg Opera. --W.carter 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Moscow Railway Terminus --A.Savin 12:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Alexander Nevsky Cathedral and the old port --A.Savin 12:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: detail of a pylon of the Volga cableway --A.Savin 12:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: Transfiguration chapel in the Kremlin --A.Savin 12:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nizhny Novgorod: detail of Chesnokov House --A.Savin 12:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 11:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 11:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 11:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 11:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Is there any way to process it with less noise? --A.Savin 12:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Yes, there is second image with almost the same motif, just a different crop. Thanks for reviewing, A.Savin. --Hubertl 14:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)  Support This one is indeed much better --A.Savin 01:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 11:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery in Hnizdychiv, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 10:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion I suppose that the day was so dark... If not, brighten it a bit, please. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Kaczorów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Kaczorów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Kaczorów 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Kaczorów 4 --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Verkhnia Bilka, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 09:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. There is a small spot (see note), probably a far away bird, because it looks too sharp to be a dust spot. Nevertheless I'd suggest to clone this out. --Smial 10:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damselfly emergence --Jkadavoor 09:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tomb of paribibi. By User:Farhan alvee --NahidSultan 07:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Needs perspective correction, and the sky looks noisy.--Peulle 08:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC) DoneFixed --Aftabuzzaman 18:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Comment OK perspective, the sky is still noisy, though. Giving it a weak  Support vote.--Peulle 18:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bagha Mosque. By User:Porag61 --NahidSultan 07:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corridor of Kadurkhil High School. By User:Intakhab --NahidSultan 07:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Beautiful composition, but corridor seems a bit too unsharp to me, the grass is oversaturated, and the bright light on the path is blown. Please try taking more photos of this motif, though! -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AVE railway station, Calatayud, Spain. --Poco a poco 06:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fortress, Sástago, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 06:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks of Misdía, Gabasa, Huesca, Spain --Poco a poco 06:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the city wall, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 06:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality is sufficient for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tambor Tower, Sástago, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 06:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail old building in Cogolo. Location, Cogolo in the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy).
    --Famberhorst 06:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Night falls over the Tjongerdellen. Location, Het Katlijker Schar Uitkijktoren Tjongertoer.
    --Famberhorst 06:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and peaceful. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main fire station Berliner Tor in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 06:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hose tower of main fire station Berliner Tor in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 06:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Two dust spots on the sky, but OK anyway --A.Savin 12:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
     Comment Dust spots removed - hopefully the correct ones ;-) Thank you for the hint! --Ajepbah 19:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inscription at main fire station Berliner Tor in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 06:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haus der Seefahrt (Seafaring House) office building in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 06:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Brightness is on the high side and focus is not pinpoint, but I think a consensus would consider this in the QI range. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Locatie, Lendevallei. Trektocht door de vallei.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Eradiates tranquility. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of the San Diego History Center in Balboa Park --Rhododendrites 05:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Missing sharpness on the foreground --A.Savin 12:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Temptation of Adam and Eve at the outer portal of Seckau Basilica, Styria --Uoaei1 05:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High altar of the parish church Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marble Hall of Melk Abbey, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dösenbach stream in the Dösen Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia --Uoaei1 05:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overall quality of this sunny picture is good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Anne's Altar in late gothic style at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination London Eye, London, England, United Kingdom --XRay 04:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building “Goat Tavern” at the Kensington High Street, London, England, United Kingdom --XRay 04:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harrods, London, England, United Kingdom --XRay 04:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK - I was worried about the cut mast, but it seems not a part of the architecture, so OK for a detail shot, IMO --A.Savin 12:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groyne with European herring gulls in Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting! --Jkadavoor 09:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Grabenring at the northern part of the town fortification and the Petersberg, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Order church Saint Nicholas and the monastery of the Dominicans on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Grabenring at the northern corner of the town fortification, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temples in Nepal a copper door bell and as a handle for door in the temple of Patan Durbar Lalitpur district --Bijaya2043 02:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Mostly unsharp, the DoF is too low I suppose --A.Savin 12:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temples in Nepal a copper door bell and as a handle for wooden door in the temple of Patan Durbar Lalitpur district --Bijaya2043 02:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fresh green vegetable cauliflower (cabbage) (by Anil Simkhada) --Bijaya2043 13:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: sorry, too noisy for this resolution. --Peulle 18:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Back foot of a mastadon composite cast (Mammut americanum) --Rhododendrites 01:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient sharpness for me --A.Savin 12:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
    @A.Savin: Would you mind taking a look at the previous version? I tried to do some denoising but may have taken it too far and shot myself in the foot (pun intended). Rhododendrites 13:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment Yes, I looked at it - but despite slightly more level of detail (and thus more noise) actually we have the same problem; it looks to me simply like misplaced focus, making most of the object blurred. For me, none of the versions OK4QI I'm sorry --A.Savin 01:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
    @A.Savin: No worries. The feedback is helpful. Thanks. Rhododendrites 01:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Campground at Longyearbyen --AWeith 00:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit grainy, but I think it's acceptable and a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alkefjellet in the fog, Svalbard --AWeith 00:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion If only you could have included the top of the cliff, but excellent! -- Ikan Kekek 04:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC). Ikan Kekek: Thanks very much! The rocks have been covered in fog until we finally left after an exciting 3hrs stay. The cliffs are massive. When the fog lifted we were already at quite some distance. --AWeith 08:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sochi Park Adventureland. The highest and high-speed extreme hill in Russia. --SKas 22:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1. I like the purple colour however I think it is manual done. Perspective and sharpness good enough. --Michielverbeek 06:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, municipality Zellerndorf, District Hollabrunn,Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 20:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ahsan Manjil (Front view). By User:Mdiht --NahidSultan 17:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Perspective issues, and unsharp at edges --A.Savin 12:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bara Shiva Temple, Puthia. By User:Nahid.rajbd --NahidSultan 17:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Perspective problems --A.Savin 12:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drum of a Bagad, Vannes (Gwened), Morbihan, France.--Jebulon 17:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house in Pfarrweisach --Ermell 14:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion The image is tilted, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 15:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC) Done I hope it´s o.k. now. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
    Perfect, thank you! --Basotxerri 15:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belper Knolle with packaging, red ribbon, WikiCheese Lausanne.Français : Belper Knolle avec ruban rouge, WikiCheese Lausanne. --Yann 13:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough, esp. the writing on the ribbon. --Palauenc05 22:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North sea at the north beach in Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for QI --A.Savin 11:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern view at the subsidiary church of the Holy Blood (Heiligblutkirche) on Seminargasse #57, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion What right on the dark side, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Agnes, for your review and assessment. I brightened the image up and uploaded a reworked version. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
    Nicer now.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave stones at the Jewish cemetery in Bamberg --Ermell 19:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ein Teich ohne Namen an der Stör in Störkathen. --Nightflyer 21:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Please check the sky for dustspots --A.Savin 02:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
     Done Sorry, i found one spot. --Nightflyer 21:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination An meinem Monitor oder auch am Laptop seh ich nichts. Ich hab das Kalibriergerät reserviert. Gruss --Nightflyer 21:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tympanon of St. Petri church in Altona. --Ajepbah 08:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of Bodelschwingh Church in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 08:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kakesbeck Castle in the hamlet Bechtrup in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Diesel locomotive TU2-208 with train at station Porechye, Malaya Zabaykalskaya railway, Chita, Russia. By User:LxAndrew --Legioner2016 02:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
    Good but it needs a tilt and a perspective correction, see posts and e.g. right side leaning in Poco a poco 06:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Temples in Nepal a lying down statue ( around 30 cm long ) in the water at Maruhit Kathmandu --Bijaya2043 03:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good picture considering how small it is (fly on the statue's head) but it is tilted and needs correcting. It also needs a much better description, an email address is not a description, and better more narrow categories. The ones you have givenare far too wide. Think you can fix this? W.carter 09:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Comment proper details and adjustment of orientation too --Bijaya2043 13:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
    Good quality. --W.carter 20:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cordon of forest guard in Caucasus Natural Biosphere Reserve. --SKas 17:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC) * Comment Despite fairly high shutter speed, this actually looks a bit overexposed. There's so much light available. Could you fix this, or do you have another version with even faster shutter speed?--Peulle 17:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
     Done New version. --SKas 22:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Comment Sorry, now you have a different problem; it's overprocessed. Look at the edges of the building and the car. You'll need to edit a RAW version, I think, and slightly darken the light areas. --Peulle 12:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
     Done Please, look at the latest version. Thanks --SKas 16:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok now, IMO --Hubertl 03:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: view of the Minaret of the great mosque f sfax --IssamBarhoumi 15:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Comment Dust spot on the left side should be removed and the contrast could be brighter.--Ermell 19:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC) dear Ermell done have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 21:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC) Comment Still one left on the left side.--Ermell 12:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC) dear Ermell really i cant see the spot if you mean the white one near the minaret on the left ... this is a cloud --IssamBarhoumi 22:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Comment I marked it. A very week spot i have to admit.--Ermell 08:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Zutaten-Img0142.jpg

• Nomination Zitronen --Ralf Roletschek 01:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The photo is absolutely QI quality, but the description and categories need to reflect the photo's subject. -- Ikan Kekek 07:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• And please fix the missing template. --XRay 16:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Would be nice if the cut glass bowl was also mentioned. W.carter 10:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support OK. I wish the title was more accurate, though. A user searching for "lemons" won't necessarily find this.--Peulle 19:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support fixed now. W.carter 20:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek 02:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Haeferl 03:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Zutaten-Img0158.jpg

• Nomination Orangen --Ralf Roletschek 01:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The photo is probably a QI (one orange seems to have a halo, but I'm guessing that's another orange behind it), but the description and categories need to reflect the photo's subject. -- Ikan Kekek 07:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Would be nice if the cut glass bowl was also mentioned. W.carter 10:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support fixed now. W.carter 20:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek 01:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Haeferl 03:53, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Top_of_Skanska_high-rise_at_Lilla_Bommen.jpg

• Nomination Top of Skanska high-rise at Lilla Bommen. --W.carter 12:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  SupportGood quality, although it should be sharpened a bit. --ElBute 11:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• I disagree. Halos at top, see notes. --Smial 11:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks Smial for spotting those! That was an accident, I'll fix it later tonight. :) W.carter 15:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Done Halos are removed. Thanks for the review! W.carter 16:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

* Sharpness could be somewhat better, but is acceptable. --Smial 10:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry guys, you know how sensitive I am with radical crops. Please, let the poor thing breathe! This could be corrected by cloning some more sky on the top. Alvesgaspar 12:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• Doable. How much space do you think is needed? Would 70-80 px suffice? W.carter 14:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• I would suggest at least the some space as on the left and right margins. Alvesgaspar 14:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Alvesgaspar:  Done Some oxygen added at the top. W.carter 18:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Question Cart, can you denoise the sky, please? Especially jarring, if seen, is a line in the sky a bit to the right of the upper left corner, and there is banding in some places. -- Ikan Kekek 05:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry but with so much tweaking of a photo, it gets a little degraded at each step so the banding will only get worse if I denoise it further. Even if a sky looks totally blue, there are so many nuances of the blue and that is not easy to handle. Instead of trying to save something in a bad way, I'll withdraw. The pic is not worth it and I have several other versions of it that are easier to start over with. Thanks for your time and patience. :) W.carter 08:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Removed all votes after rework. Now  Neutral There are now artifacts in the sky. --Smial 09:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• Pic is now reverted to an earlier version. W.carter 12:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 09:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Pollia undosa 01.JPG

• Nomination Shell of a Waved Goblet, Pollia undosa --Llez 22:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I think this file is worth a discussion. Whites look blown out in places, and I think the sharpness is probably improvable. -- Ikan Kekek 04:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I will not necessarily oppose this nomination, in the end. My remark is more in the nature of a review, but opposition was necessary to get to a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Slightly noisy in places, but OK considering the high resolution. The whites would look wrong if darkened, I think. --Peulle 08:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support This is a QI for me.--Ermell 16:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Flaschen-Img0035.jpg

• Nomination Zitronensirup --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose The photo is QI but even if you have an accurate description of what's in the photo here at QIC, there is none of that on the file's page or in the categories. Please fix that. --W.carter 14:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I agree with cart. Add the relevant categories and give a good file description, and then we can vote to promote this picture, as the quality is fine for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. The image is fine so I'll vote to support once the title, category and description are amended.--Peulle 08:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support And so it is done. (Image title could still be something more accurate, though, like "Lemon cyrup" or something).--Peulle 07:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support fixed W.carter 09:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek 09:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Drink-Img0252_1.jpg

• Nomination Highball Glas --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Yum! --King of Hearts 03:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose The photo is QI but even if you have an accurate description of what's in the photo here at QIC, there is none of that on the file's page or in the categories. Please fix that. --W.carter 14:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I agree with cart. Add the relevant categories and give a good file description, and then we can vote to promote this picture, as the quality is fine for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. The image is fine so I'll vote to support once the title, category and description are amended. Please keep in mind that Commons need these things to be useful, otherwise people can't properly search for images.--Peulle 08:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support It's  Done. One of the categories was a red link, I fixed it for you.--Peulle 08:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support fixed --W.carter 09:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Flaschen-Img0184.jpg

• Nomination Cocktailbitter --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose The photo is QI but even if you have an accurate description of what's in the photo here at QIC, there is none of that on the file's page or in the categories. Please fix that. --W.carter 14:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I agree with cart. Add the relevant categories and give a good file description, and then we can vote to promote this picture, as the quality is adequate for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. The image is fine so I'll vote to support once the title, category and description are amended. Please keep in mind that Commons need these things to be useful, otherwise people can't properly search for images.--Peulle 08:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

  Ich finde keine sinnvollen Kategorien. Ich bin seit über 10 Jahren bei Commons, das Kategorienchaos ist für mich nicht nutzbar und für Leser wohl ebensowenig, wenn man nicht gut Enlisch kann. Leser finden Bilder über Wikipediaartikel. Die Beschreibung war ungenügend, das ist richtig. Das Bild ist im deutschen Artikel "Cocktailbitter". Den gibt es aber laut Interwiki nirgendwo anders. Google Translate liefert mir "Cocktail Bitter", so einen Artikel gibts auf .en nicht. So eine Kategorie gibts auch nicht auf Commons. Mir ist schon klar, daß mir jetzt irgendwer hier gleich irgendwelche Kategorien nennen wird, die passen. Aber ich kann nur zwei rote einfügen, den Hersteller und eben das genannte Cocktail Bitter. Wie gesagt, die Beschreibung, da habe ich versagt, das habe ich nachgebessert. Aber bei den Kategorien bin ich machtlos. Bitte bedenkt, daß es auch Menschen gibt, die kein Englisch können und denen sich das Kategoriensystem nicht erschließt.

  (Google Translate:) I can not find any meaningful categories. I've been at Commons for over 10 years, the classchaos is not for me and for readers probably just as well, if one can not well Enlish can. Readers can find pictures on Wikipedia articles. The description was inadequate, that's right. The picture is in the German article "Cocktailbitter". However, according to Interwiki, there is nowhere else. Google Translate gives me "Cocktail Bitter", so an article is not. So a category is also not on Commons. It is clear to me that now somebody here will call some categories that fit. But I can only insert two red, the manufacturer and just the mentioned cocktail bitters. As I said, the description, I have failed, I have improved. But in the categories I am powerless. Please bear in mind that there are also people who can not speak English and who are not familiar with the category system.

• The correct category is Category:Bitters. However, Ralf makes an important point. Why aren't there translations of every category name into many different languages? -- Ikan Kekek 02:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• I've added that category and now vote to  Support this nomination, but the problem Ralf lays out needs to be addressed. -- Ikan Kekek 02:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. It is indeed a bit problematic that the Commons categories don't easily translate. It's not something we here can solve easily either; I think we must either create categories that are missing (if they are missing), or we as a community can try to help each other by finding appropriate categories. If an image is good enough, I wouldn't mind spending some time helping with that.--Peulle 08:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support since fixed. I agree with Peulle that the non-translated cats is a problem, but if other users are to help with the categories, the decription must be filled in properly in any language. I've helped fix up files in languages I've never even heard of with online translators just because they at least had a good description. W.carter 09:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Ralf Roletschek: (Google Translate) Ich stimme mit Peulle, dass die nicht übersetzten Kategorien ein Problem ist, aber wenn andere Benutzer sind, um mit den Kategorien zu helfen, muss die Decription in jeder Sprache richtig gefüllt werden. Ich habe geholfen, reparieren Dateien in Sprachen, die ich noch nie gehört habe mit Online-Übersetzer, nur weil sie zumindest eine gute Beschreibung hatte. W.carter 09:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Ja, und bitte auch die Titeln, die sollten auch ein bisschen mehr präzise sein. :) --Peulle 19:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Changing file names should be done very sensible, as many, if not most photographers include some kind of personal system. This system should not be destroyed when renaming. Adding further information is in most cases ok. -- Smial 20:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Commons' sorting system is more important than photographers' sorting system, IMO. Any anyway, the QI Guidelines say that an image needs to have a meaningful title.--Peulle 22:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment I agree to "needs to have a meaningful title", but where is the "commons sorting system" regarding file names? Categories have a system, though it is widely inconsistent and confusing, but, yes, it is kind of system. But file names? --Smial 08:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Perhaps "sorting system" is the wrong word for it, but what I mean is that you should be able to search for something and easily find it. Using a personal indexing system, such as the one above with numbers and dates, isn't really what Commons needs. It's good for the photographer to find it on his harddrive, but no good for finding it on Commons. What is needed is something like "Bottles of De Kuyper bitter", not "16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Flaschen-Img0184.jpg". I think people trying to find "bottles of bitter" or even "De Kuyper bitter" on Commons will have problems finding this one. In fact, I think I will nominate these images for file name changes.--Peulle 12:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination with such a filename it isn't longer my Photo. --Ralf Roleček 15:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I understand and sympathize. Commons, however, is not a photographer's personal image library. Photos should have meaningful titles or their role in the Commons library is all but meaningless since people cannot find them.--Peulle 17:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Most people who look for photos in commons have very little or no knowledge about the category system. They simply enter a description of what they are looking for in the searchbox and select from the results. Those results get displayed based in file name and not category, second is also the text in the description, so correct file names a vital for this collection of pics to work. I also agree with what Peulle say above. The moment you finish the upload and hit "Save" you have legally handed over everything about your pics to the Wikimedia community, it sais so right above the button. --W.carter 17:53, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
    • This works only in the language of the file name. Descriptions have any number of languages. And the next mean, this name is also meaningless and move it to File:Botellas de vidrio azul con pipetas.jpg, the next to File:Blue glass bottles with silver labels.jpg. The original Filename was NOT "meaningless or ambiguous". Filenames ar no Descriptions or/and categorys. --Ralf Roletschek 18:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
      • No file name works in all languages, but a proper filename in English or German is better than just the WikiLoves Cocktails plus some number. May I also say that you write very good English even if you say you don't speak it or understand it. cart-Talk 20:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Baguette_de_pain,_WikiCheese_Lausanne.jpg

• Nomination Bread loaf, WikiCheese Lausanne. --Yann 14:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Sharpness below standards for a studio shot, and messed up background. --Smial 12:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose per Smial. It's arguable, but I come down on Smial's side. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose as others. Sorry. --Hubertl 14:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Interior of Samsung Wooble.jpg

• Nomination Interior washing drum of Samsung Wobble 6.2 Kg washing machine --Krishna Chaitanya Velaga 03:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Nice idea. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose There are JPEG artefacts all over the picture --A.Savin 03:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Question - I don't know how to recognize JPG artifacts per se. Is it the distortion on the sides of the washer that you're referring to, or is there something else to look for? -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment There are no jpg artifacts. But there is lots of noise, and unfortunate noise reduction, combined with helpless attemps to re-sharpen, which alltogether can easily be confused with jpg artifacts. -- Smial 11:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, lighting, reflections. --Smial 11:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No area of the image has acceptable quality: Very poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 16:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Regretfully, I will oppose, too. I'm troubled by the quality of the depiction of the sides. I really like this compositional idea, though, and I encourage you to take more photos of it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Pavillon de Marsan - PA00085992 - 002.jpg

• Nomination Louvre Museum, Paris, France (by Thesupermat) --Paris 16 15:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The buildings looks fine but the sky is too noisy IMHO Poco a poco 16:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose per Poco --A.Savin 10:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Way too noisy. To me, this is nowhere close to a QI, in this condition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Noise is on the high side in the sky, but acceptable. Better slight noise than blur. --Smial 16:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as Smial. --Ralf Roletschek 16:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please note that Poco a poco was not shown as opposing, but unless he changed his mind, he clearly did, as this would have been a Decline, except for Ermell's demurral. I have taken the liberty of inserting the Oppose template and added his opposing vote to the total below. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

  That's fine, Ikan, it was not an oppose as I was expecting the author to fix it in order to get it promoted. As it looks that he didn't and will not an oppose is right now how I see it Poco a poco 08:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too much noise in the sky. Alvesgaspar 19:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice detail level of building. In a realistic viewing distance seeing the image in its entirety or in print I would claim the noise in the sky would not be noticeable. -- Slaunger 20:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise is very visible even at preview size. @Paris 16: I'd be glad to support if fixed. By the way, I must say the sharpness is very impressive for f/4.5. --King of Hearts 00:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, but I don't known how to fix it. Maybe someone help me.--Paris 16 09:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

@Paris 16: This is rather something for the author. RAW data needs better development --A.Savin 16:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Paris 16: When you sharpen your pictures, do you sharpen them everywhere equally or do you use a sharpening mask (which would apply little or no sharpening to the sky and more to the building)? Poco a poco 08:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me. Too much contrast or clarity, but clear QI picture IMO--Lmbuga 16:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose as others --Hubertl 02:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 09:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)