Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 01 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Velvet-fronted_Nuthatch_Sasatgre_Oct24_A7CR_03748.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Velvet-fronted nuthatch (Sitta frontalis) perched upside down, glowing in setting sun light, Dopatchi Homestay, Sasatgre --Tagooty 00:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, too noisy due ISO 4000. --Plozessor 03:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • @Plozessor: ✓ Done I have applied NR. Please review the new version. --Tagooty 04:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Sorry, not convinced. Would have been better with lower ISO and longer exposure. But let's hear other opinions. --Plozessor 05:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • @Plozessor: These small birds do not sit still while foraging upside down. Longer exposure would have resulted in blurry image. --Tagooty 15:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor. --Sebring12Hrs 12:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support It's a difficult shot with acceptable sharpness, even if it's not perfect. Longer exposure time for a bird like this is definitely not the answer, though. They don't sit still and move very fast, so a fast shutter is a must. ReneeWrites 10:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Nieborów_2023_17_Palace_Park_Lake.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Nieborów Palace Park Lake Reflection --Scotch Mist 06:40, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too soft imo --MB-one 18:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your review - certainly the trees as well as their reflections could be sharper but perhaps we can get some other opinions on whether this 'reflective image' merits QI? --Scotch Mist 10:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Sharpness is fine. Shadows could be a bit brighter and sky could be darker, but I guess that's due to the weather conditions. --Plozessor 07:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMO good enough, but Category:Nieborów should be removed because it is in the category tree two levels below Category:Park of Nieborów Palace (overcategorization). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

20240920_53rd_Street_Hyde_Park_Chicago_near_equinox_stacked_rotated_and_cropped.jpg

[edit]

  • I mean, you're free to do whatever you want with the photos, and you can make lots of different developments and experiment with different choices - that's all fun and good. But when it comes to getting a photo promoted to QI status, the point is to just choose one version and stick with that.--Peulle 08:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)