Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 29 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mikhail_Bulgakov_in_Khimki_Reservoir_2016-05-09_Pic_04.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination "Mikhail Bulgakov" with a yacht on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Some dust spots on the sky that should be removed. Also, please add description to the image page. --Halavar 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --多多123 17:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks! Good quality now. --Halavar 22:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The small black cruiser on the left obscures the ship you are nominating and is distracting. The fix is patience when making the image. Either make the image before the cruiser gets there and wait until it is gone. --GRDN711 17:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC) *
    I corrected the name of nomination. --Mike1979 Russia 18:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Appreciate the administrative effort but the cruiser remains a distraction to the image. You also have nominated other images of this ship that are without any distractions and they are likely to be QI-rated. Suggest you bring your best for QI nomination. --GRDN711 09:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support It's a perfectly fine photo of two boats. No problem. -- Ikan Kekek 19:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support It's more realistic IMO. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok --Jakubhal 16:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment If the black cruiser was important to the image, it would have a name identified in the ship description and relate in some way to Mikhail Bulgakov. As it is, IMHO, it is just a distraction blocking the stern of the ship and could have been avoided. --GRDN711 09:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment If the only issue is that the photo should be renamed in this kind of situation, is that a reason to decline it? I don't think so, but maybe Mike1979 would like to rename the photo after consideration of the nomination is finished. -- Ikan Kekek 20:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Ikan Kekek - the problem with the image is not about renaming. The key issue is that a black, anonymous, inconsequential cruiser is distraction blocking the stern of the ship that could easily have been avoided with a little patience. Mike1979 already has QI-rated images of this Mikhail Bulgakov ship with no cruiser distraction. With the cruiser in it, this image is not QI. --GRDN711 11:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment GRDN711, Why did you decide that the photo illustrates the "Mikhail Bulgakov" ship only? The photo illustrates the traffic on the reservoir. Why did you decide that ships must be related to each other and must have names? Such yachts and this one don't have name in Russia, they have GIMS nimber only. It's like automobile number. But I corrected the description of foto. --Mike1979 Russia 15:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   -- Mike Peel 18:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)