Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 27 2018
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Calico Hills, Red Rock Canyon -- Sixflashphoto 02:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South Rim, Grand Canyon -- Sixflashphoto 02:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Logan Sign, Lake Logan State Park -- Sixflashphoto 02:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Logan Marina, Lake Logan State Park -- Sixflashphoto 02:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Fuchspalast, designed by Ernst Fuchs on Prof.-Ernst-Fuchs-Platz #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque western portal of the city parish church holy Trinity on Kirchplatz, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schüsselbrunnen (bowl fountain) on Hauptplatz (main square), Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Epitaph for Karl Anton von Mayerhofen (1787) at the southeastern retaining wall of the parish church Holy Trinity on Kirchplatz, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortification and moat at the north side of the old city on Spitalgasse #7, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the south-western rock face of the Rotenfels, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany; (Rotenfels: 7133-091 WDPA: 7050) --Wild Tibbi 23:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The picture is too blurry to me, sorry. --Podzemnik 23:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings in the villages Sågmyra in Leksand Municipality. --ArildV 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dieses Bild zeigt das Schutzgebiet in der World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) mit der Nummer 321550 --Nightflyer 18:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old man cactus (Cephalocereus senilis) --Rhododendrites 17:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooly torch (Cleistocactus strausii) at the New York Botanical Garden --Rhododendrites 17:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jade vine (Strongylodon macrobotrys) at the New York Botanical Garden --Rhododendrites 17:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silken pincushion cactus (Mammillaria bombycina) --Rhododendrites 17:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wreck of a Volkswagen T1 Pickup. --Palauenc05 16:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shadow of a palm in the pool of Jameos del Agua, Lanzarote --Llez 16:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support When I first saw your image, I was convinced it is a painting from the MUMOK. That's genuine art photography. To my eyes one of the very best photos I have ever seen in this community, in either direction technical and meaningful. BRAVO! -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Wooden seawall.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 16:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Wooden seawall.
-
- Nomination Bar at the Jameos del Agua by César Manrique, Lanzarote --Llez 14:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wildpark Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sentmaring park, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Bari, Piazza dell'Odegitria, north side --Berthold Werner 11:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The little Venice in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 10:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too much going on here, all that people just spoils it --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pfeffel square in Colmar: statue of Théophile Conrad Pfeffel. --Gzen92 10:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Terribly overexposed, in such a way that even the sky has got texture --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Querini in Mestre-VeniceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:You may select the license of your choice. --Moroder 10:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very good quality. --Tsungam 09:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former mountain hut in Lasówka 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former mountain hut in Lasówka 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asus P3C2000 - AMR slot. By User:Raymond --Grendelkhan 08:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beautiful Begnas Lake and Sundari Danda. By User:Tsewang Lama --Biplab Anand 07:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 11:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Durón, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 11:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrepeñas reservoir, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Misty. :) --Peulle 07:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Monaco --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ollagüe volcano, Bolivia --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Franz Josef Glacier in Westland National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Cahors, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the outbuilding of the Palais de la Berbie in Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Roch Chapel of Noailhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotenfels and Nahe river, Bad Muenster am Stein-Ebernburg, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (7133-091 WDPA: 7050) --Wild Tibbi 06:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. --Ermell 06:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ on the Mount of Olives at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Maria Laach am Jauerling, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capture of Christ at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Maria Laach am Jauerling, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermill Zumbülte in Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, main subject in focus. Tournasol7 06:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A building at the crossroad of Douglas and Broughton Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada --Podzemnik 05:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Natural Monument in the Park Sentmaring in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion * Comment Good quality when the red halos are removed from the branches.--Famberhorst 05:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Fixed Sorry. Hopefully the last CAs removed. --XRay 13:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay now. Thank you.--Famberhorst 15:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Natural Monument in the Park Sentmaring in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Icebreakers on the former island.
--Famberhorst 05:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 09:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Icebreakers on the former island.
-
- Nomination Ministry of Defense building of Thailand, Bangkok --Supanut Arunoprayote 04:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 08:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum Siam, Bangkok --Supanut Arunoprayote 04:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dukes` castle on Burggasse #9, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Townhall in gothic style on Hauptplatz #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Too bad about the car on the right. and too bad the picture is not symmetrical. But a nice quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Due to those two issues I hesitated whether to nominate this image or not. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Townhall’s arcade yard on Hauptplatz #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schüsselbrunnen (bowl fountain) on Hauptplatz (main square), Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Slightly tilted ccw --Uoaei1 05:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Done @Uoaei1: I compensated the ccw tilt. Hopefully the result is satisfying now. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Epitaph for Wolf Leyser von Lambsheim († 1587), St. Ulrich Church, Deidesheim, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Ballast stones from an excavated ship.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 09:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Ballast stones from an excavated ship.
-
- Nomination Zeppelin NT (Zeppelin CAT) airship over Prague, Czech Republic --JiriMatejicek 12:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too noise, not a QI level, sorry --Poco a poco 18:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
I understand, but it was moving pretty fast and zoom was to the max - so one couldn't expect the same sharpness as with a building that stands still and lets you come close...-JiriMatejicek 13:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Bari, San Nicola church --Berthold Werner 16:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Good quality but please remove the dust spot (see images note). --ArildV 16:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Done --Berthold Werner 09:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) Thank you, QI.--ArildV 19:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Italy, Bari, San Nicola church --Berthold Werner 16:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 06:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Moroder 17:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sninský kameň --Milan Bališin 18:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 13:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sninský kameň --Milan Bališin 18:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 13:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ketchikan, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 07:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 17:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Prunus mume "Peggy Clark" at the New York Botanical Garden. --Rhododendrites 14:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Imperial Chambers, Dale Street, Liverpool --Rodhullandemu 21:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Comment CA on top, fix vertical lines --Moroder 10:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Done --Rodhullandemu 18:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Imperial Chambers, Dale Street, Liverpool --Rodhullandemu 21:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Comment CA on top, fix vertical lines --Moroder 10:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Skelly, British Columbia, Canadá --Poco a poco 18:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 10:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Осколки_льда.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lake Baikal in winter (by Discoverynn) --SKas 09:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood quality. --Peulle 09:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)- Oppose It´s amazing, but let´s talk again about downsampling. --Milseburg 19:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Milseburg: Downsampling? What did you mean? The resolution exceeds the minimum requirements. Not any reasons for discussion. I would like to see a photo in higher resolution too. But also such resolution is enough for QI. --SKas 07:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Holding off my vote until Milseburg's concern has been addressed. @SKas: Please look at the Resolution/Downsampling section of the Guidelines: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality." This is a nature photograph, so there had better be a very good reason for the reduction in size. This rule is in place to avoid users downsampling their photograph to just above the absolute limit of 2 Mpx. --Peulle 11:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Images shouldn't be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. Yes, it is written so in the Guidelines. There is absolutely other case. The image has been loaded in not the highest resolution, but not to appear of better quality. I don't know why. Maybe the image has been damaged or something else. If this image was loaded in the highest resolution, it would be even better. But also at such resolution the image is great and completely corresponds to a concept the quality image. --SKas 04:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I think the guidelines give us a good example of a case where downsizing is acceptable: portraits where the full size might be unflattering to the person depicted. For nature photography, I can't see any reason. Gentle cropping to get rid of disturbing trees or something is OK, but reducing the size greatly ... I don't see why it should be done.--Peulle 07:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It is not the answer to a direct question, but abstract reasonings. And please don't substitute downsampling for cutting. These are absolutely different things IMO. Sorry --SKas 08:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment To which direct question are you referring? I see none that has not been answered. Also, you misunderstood my comment; I said that gentle cropping might be OK but that the general downsampling (which seems to be the case here) is not.--Peulle 15:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment From the camera used, quality in a higher resolution can be expected. About 6 MP instead of 36 MP is heavy. By using such downsizing many quality problems can be hidden and the QI-level becomes low. Maybe this is a candidate for VI. --Milseburg 16:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It is not the answer to a direct question, but abstract reasonings. And please don't substitute downsampling for cutting. These are absolutely different things IMO. Sorry --SKas 08:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Holding off my vote until Milseburg's concern has been addressed. @SKas: Please look at the Resolution/Downsampling section of the Guidelines: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality." This is a nature photograph, so there had better be a very good reason for the reduction in size. This rule is in place to avoid users downsampling their photograph to just above the absolute limit of 2 Mpx. --Peulle 11:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Discoverynn: Would you be able to upload a higher resolution? --Basotxerri 07:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- And how about for this entire series? It looks great, but we need higher-resolution photos to evaluate them for possible Featured Picture Candidates nomination, as well as consideration here. -- Ikan Kekek 20:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
File:15-07-11-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S_8826.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Airbus A320 EI-DSW von Alitalia FlughafenParis Charles de Gaulle --Ralf Roletschek 12:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The dust spot should be removed as well as the reflections of the windows in the sky. --Ermell 06:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 07:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
File:2018-05-06_Fünfmarkstückeiche,_Kierspe,_NRW_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fünfmarkstückeiche, ND 2.3.2, südöstlich v. Haus Rhade, 58566 Kierspe. By User:YvoBentele --XRay 11:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--ArildV 15:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not convinced here, it definitely lacks detail. --Poco a poco 15:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support - The sky is slightly noisy, but a good landscape, and in a landscape, it is unnecessary to focus on the small details of individual trees and blades of grass. -- Ikan Kekek 18:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco.--Ermell 06:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan Kekek. --Granada 11:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Destructive noise reduction in some areas, but main object is ok. Very nice lighting and composition. --Smial 13:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Peulle 22:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)