Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 16 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ciervo_mulo_(Odocoileus_hemionus),_Lago_Laberge,_Yukón,_Canadá,_2017-08-26,_DD_163.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), Laberge Lake, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 07:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Noisy --Basile Morin 08:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Moving to CR as no reaction there in 2 days, I think the last version is good to go. --Poco a poco 11:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry, didn't notice. But still oppose, since animal not sharp and awkward crop with blurry background and foreground -- Basile Morin 08:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpened. --Basotxerri 07:47, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Cañón_Miles,_Yukón,_Canadá,_2017-08-26,_DD_133.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Miles Canyon, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 18:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Overexposed --Daniel Case 05:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
I just uploaded a new version, should be ok for QI, please, let's discuss. --Poco a poco 19:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support it wasn't overexposed in the first version of the file... not even touching the white corner of the histogram in any version. And this actually could be a problem, not white and black points, but for a QI is good enough. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 05:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Hmmm I can't decide. The foreground doesn't look overexposed but the upper mid section does; the reflection from the trees there is quite heavy. Would it perhaps be possible to use tone mapping on a version with lower exposure time? Or reducing the highlights?--Peulle 09:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
    ✓ New version with reduced dynamic range Poco a poco 14:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment an image can be overexposed (over-all too bright) without having any highlights clipping, and I think that was the case in the first versions. Looks fine for me now →  Support --El Grafo 14:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell 08:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 16:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)