Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 14 2022

• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Saint Peter parish church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hôtel de Nayrac in Castres, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 04:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 5 Tour de ville in Entraygues-sur-Truyere, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Craft training centers at Ostdamm in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marian column on the Marienplatz in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dülmen pony in the Merfelder Bruch bei Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nature reserve “Hohemarkenbusch” near Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dülmen pony in the Merfelder Bruch bei Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wachau, view from Dürnsteiner Kanzel, municipality of Dürnstein, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 03:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malus domestica blossom, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowers of Narcissus tazetta on 10. Oktober Straße #67 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Syringa komarowii on 10. Oktober Straße #69 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chinese peony (Paeonia lactiflora), Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chinese peony (Paeonia lactiflora) in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination David Harrer, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 00:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination tree blossom in front of Stanford Beckman Building --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: multiple issues. --Peulle 21:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination a South Vietnam flag seen on a building in Oakland, CA --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. It's hard to get the level of quality needed today with a mobile phone. --Peulle 21:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turkeys seen in Stanford Gold Course (at Links Rd) in the evening --Suiren2022 20:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Low level of detail. --Peulle 21:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spyders Inc 718 RSK at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2021.--Alexander-93 19:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Godd quality -- Spurzem 21:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 323 (E21) at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2021.--Alexander-93 19:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. -- Spurzem 20:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sargo (Diplodus sargus), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 21:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mediterranean parrotfish (Sparisoma cretense), Madeira, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mediterranean parrotfish (Sparisoma cretense), Monte da Guia, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reclining Buddha statue, Wat Pho, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 17:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Peter Svetits, president of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Günter Kreissl, manager of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Günter Kreissl, manager of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rene Seebacher, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 16:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shalimar Bagh, Srinagar by Pradeepkjoshi --UnpetitproleX 16:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Liesikuja parking hall middle floor in Myyrmäki, Vantaa --Ximonic 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staircase in Liesikuja parking hall in Myyrmäki, Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View northeast from Liesikuja parking hall, Myyrmäki, Vantaa --Ximonic 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Myyrmäki Church in Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 70's apartment buildings in Myyrmäki, Vantaa --Ximonic 15:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malot temple, front façade by Kkashaff --UnpetitproleX 13:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Detail overall low and very low on the right --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Darß Forest, looking to the Baltic Sea --Milseburg 13:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Darß Forest, looking to the Baltic Sea --Milseburg 13:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building "Zum Harzhäusl" in Stolberg (Harz), Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harz information centre in Stolberg, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Place where Thomas Müntzer was born in Stolberg (Harz), Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A timbered house in Stolberg (Harz), Germany. Built in 1550. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A timbered house in Stolberg (Harz), Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Pechstein vineyard in Forst with a view of Wachtenburg Castle
    --F. Riedelio 10:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lateral entrance (1689) of "Domherrenkurie Zolvern", Trier. --Palauenc05 08:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red oak (Quercus rubra) blooming --Ввласенко 07:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The war memorial in La Haye-du-Puits, France --Velvet 07:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Jean-l'Évangéliste church, in La Haye-du-Puits, France --Velvet 07:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stamp of the flower of a columbine --Ermell 07:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young girl feeding koi in a park in Tokyo --Ermell 07:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ho pots in front of a restaurant in Beijing --Ermell 07:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge over a pond in Shibarikyū Park in Tokyo --Ermell 07:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kitchen knife with cutting board and parsley --Ermell 07:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Faval Auger, Oxymeris senegalensis --Llez 05:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Our Lady church in Le Poujol, commune of Pont-de-Salars, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chandelier in the Saint Peter parish church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Heimfeld, path "Schießbahn" into nature reserve "Heimfelder Holz" --KaiBorgeest 22:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BC Ferries RO-PAX ferry, MV Spirit of Vancouver Island, en route from Tsawwassen to Swartz Bay, BC Canada --GRDN711 21:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The players of SK Austria Klagenfurt are celebrating a goal. --Steindy 17:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front wheel and fender of a McLaren Senna at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 15:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ciucaș Mountains, Prahova County, Romania. --Kallerna 13:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, adding coordinates would be fine. --Milseburg 16:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
    Added. --Kallerna 10:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Interesting, you should always do so. --Milseburg 13:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Floor mural outside Nottingham Castle --Mike Peel 06:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Smooth brittle-star (Ophioderma longicauda), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White stork (Ciconia ciconia) in Illhaeusern (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
    better if the bird isn't lookingaway --Charlesjsharp 08:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vlaardingen-NL, church: Sint Joannes de Dooperkerk --Michielverbeek 05:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry: Too low sharpness for QI, disturbing luminance noise --F. Riedelio 09:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road sign in Remiremont, France. --Mathieu Kappler 00:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - L'Eden --Jmh2o 19:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    check contrast --Ezarate 23:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
     Done --Jmh2o 16:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    Can you sharpen a bit? --Ezarate 12:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
     Done --Jmh2o 17:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 12:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palacio Insular de Tenerife --Mike Peel 15:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too unsharp --Ezarate 23:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Лютик в Парке Сокольники. Восточный округ, Москва --Ulaisaeva 14:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose nothing in focus, flower on the right overexposed --Ezarate 23:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breckland thyme (Thymus serpyllum) --Ssprmannheim 13:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose nothing is in focus --Ezarate 23:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sukhna Lake by Gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 13:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose nothing is in focus --Ezarate 23:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowering tree in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figure above the entrance to Palais Rantzau in Lübeck --Kritzolina 06:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht-NL, the cannons and the town wall near the Onze-Lieve Vrouwewal --Michielverbeek 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Michael church of Montredon, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Useful if the Description indicates which part of the church is depicted, the angle of view, etc. --Tagooty 03:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    the position of the photographer determines it --Tournasol7 03:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    The filename and Description imply the full church. The image is a specific part of the church. Potential users search based on text keywords. --Tagooty 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    Each photo contains information about the photographer's position. The user can easily find out from which side the photo was taken. --Tournasol7 05:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The church is a little blurred. Because of moving camera ? . --Sebring12Hrs 14:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)  Support In my eyes clearly above the QI-bar. --Milseburg 14:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John church in Saint-Jean-Mirabel, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Useful if the Description indicates which part of the church is depicted, the angle of view, etc. --Tagooty 03:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    the position of the photographer determines it --Tournasol7 03:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    The filename and Description imply the full church. The image is a specific part of the church. Potential users search based on text keywords. --Tagooty 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    Each photo contains information about the photographer's position. The user can easily find out from which side the photo was taken. --Tournasol7 05:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The church is a little blurred. Because of moving camera ? . --Sebring12Hrs 14:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)  Support No convincing arguments to decline in my opinion. Resolution is rather high and sharpness good enough.--Milseburg 14:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht-NL, the Mariamonument --Michielverbeek 06:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please, try to denoise the sky --Ezarate 23:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
    I have made  Done a new version from RAW, however I don't see a noise reducement --Michielverbeek 20:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. with/out noise, same is QI --Ezarate 23:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._SK_Austria_Klagenfurt_2015-10-20_(104).jpg

• Nomination Daniel Kerschbaumer, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 15:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 19:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Perhaps a bit soft, but sharp enough for me. Impressive portrait. -- Spurzem 20:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree that this is a good portrait, but I don't think it's sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Probably a VI, but not sharp enough considering the fairly low size.--Peulle 06:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Info New version uploaded. --Steindy 19:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment It seems worse to me in this version and looked more natural before, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 21:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
• Yes, this hasn't worked. The image itself is out of focus, no amount of post-processing can save it.--Peulle 06:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Di_Suatu_Pagi_Bersama_Perahu_Nelayan.jpg

• Nomination Fishing boat in Sanur beach. --Rachmat04 15:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support I love this shot! --Kritzolina 06:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I like it very much also, but in my opion it is not sharp enough for QI. Let's discuss --Jakubhal 11:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support it's ok. Sharp enough for me. --Hillopo2018 08:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it's a bit too soft. On such a clear day, there should be plenty of light available for a sharper exposure. I also see a smidge of CA on the boat's port side. Nice composition, though.--Peulle 08:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Very good image and up to a size of A4 and a bit more sharp enough -- Spurzem 11:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
• Weak  Support per Spurzem. f/22 wasn't the best choice. --Smial 12:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral The photograph is impressive, the sharpness poor und the categorization very poor. Sorry. --XRay 16:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

• I added two categories. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose CAs everywhere at right. Are they irrevelant ? --Sebring12Hrs 04:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Germany_Rhineland-Palatinate_Trier_cricket_fountain_Heuschreckbrunnen_NE.jpg

• Nomination Trier, Germany; Cricket fountain 'Heuschreckbrunnern' seen from north east --Virtual-Pano 11:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Composition/lighting: Background is distracting. --Sitacuisses 16:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Not so bad. Worth to discuss. the main subjekt is good in focus. For NE light is okay, I think. --Milseburg 12:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sitacuisses. --Sebring12Hrs 06:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  weak support It's close. The background is indeed very busy, but when looking at the medium resolution we can see that the background is out of focus (maybe a smaller f-stop would have been even better...) and that the subject is sharp. It's nigh impossible to do this differently; the sculpture is in a public place and we can't cut down the trees or demolish the building behind it so that we can get a cleaner background. That clinches the argument for me.--Peulle 07:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 09:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad light & background. --Kallerna 13:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support by Peulle. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Katas_Raj_Temple_Punjab.jpg

• Nomination: Katas Raj Temple by Mhtoori --UnpetitproleX 08:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
• Review  Comment Good quality but an unfortunate top crop. Also, are the colors true? -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  Judging from other pictures online—the water does appear to be emerald in all of them—I'd say the colours are true. --UnpetitproleX 12:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
   Comment I was also unsure about the color of the sky. I'll think about whether I consider this a QI with that unfortunate crop. I wish there were a way to add a little bit on top. -- Ikan Kekek 12:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
   Support I'll support, but I would welcome a discussion at CR, and I'm guessing it would be voted down there. -- Ikan Kekek 19:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  Thanks for the support, I'll move it to CR. --UnpetitproleX 03:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment It was polite of you to move it here, but I think you really didn't have to. I could have been wrong, as no-one else had taken any action or made any comment. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose the cropped cap is the tipping point in my opinion --Virtual-Pano 23:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Fiore di Salvia verbenica.jpg

• Nomination Barlia (Barlia robertiana) Belonging to the fascinating orchid family, it is a herbaceous perennial unfortunately at risk of extinction. --PROPOLI87 08:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose I don't know how big these flowers are, but they look noisy/unsharp. Also, for whatever it's worth, per w:Himantoglossum robertianum, Least Concern and "It is believed that its distribution range is expanding due to the effects of climate change." -- Ikan Kekek 14:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)* CommentIt is a very small ear of about 5 cm including the stem. It's a "macro" photo. I saw that it is a plant that is in danger of extinction and for this reason I thought it important to post the photo.PROPOLI87 14:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 14:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
   Comment In view of its size, I've crossed out my opposing vote. Keep in mind, though, that COM:VIC is always a possible place to nominate photos of scarce living things. -- Ikan Kekek 15:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)*Template:CMT OK Thank youPROPOLI87 15:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 15:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Misidentified. This is not even an orchid, but possibly something from the Lamiaceae, possibly genus Salvia or something similar. In addition, hardly any flower is in focus, even after downsizing to 2 MP. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
•  CommentThe plant grew spontaneously in my meadow, obviously being wild it is a very small ear, I classified Barlia robertiana after searching a lot on the web in search of an identical flower. The photo has not been reduced, but is done as a "macro". It is certainly not sage as it is directly on the lawn and not on top of the leaves and branches as sage typically blooms, as well as the color of the sage flowers is more soft lilac not purple.could it be Lamium maculatum?

In case I could change the category.PROPOLI87 07:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• No, this is not a Lamium species; I am not sure about the genus or even the family, but it is from the Lamiales, not an orchid. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
• What do I do? Do I categorize as Lamiaceae?At this point not so much for quality photo recognition, as for giving the correct category.PROPOLI87 08:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• I am not sure. There is an image that is named Salvia verbenaca that looks very similar, see File:Salvia verbenaca b.JPG, but ID down to species levl might be very risky without even checking an image of the whole plant with the leaves or without being an expert of Italian flora. If you are less sure, you might select Category:Salvia in Italy and Category:Unidentified Salvia. If you are even less sure, Category:Unidentified Lamiaceae or even Category:Unidentified Lamiales in Italy or both could be good. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• there is a curious fact, Salvia verbenaca has a stump of leaves at the base from which flowers sprout, my photo instead represents a flower that has sprung up spontaneously in the garden without leaves underneath. Is it possible that Salvia verbenaca is only made from the flower with no leaf base?

• I don't really know the species, but I seriously doubt that. I am also not sure whether File:Salvia verbenaca b.JPG was even correctly identified, e.g. when I compare it to [1]. Most of the images on the page Salvia verbenaca were misidentified anyway; e.g. File:SALVIA VERBENACA - SANT JUST - IB-703 (Tàrrec).JPG looks a lot like ordinary Salvia pratensis. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

• In all this uncertainty, the solution I can find is to go, over the weekend, to the place where I photographed to see the development of the flower, maybe in the meantime others could have grown and be able to understand more.PROPOLI87 10:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

• You're absolutely right. In a week the photographed flower stretched, along its stem other flowers sprouted, and at the base a stump of leaves was formed. I provide the right category and ask for the name of the file. PROPOLI87 16:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 16:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

• File:Salvia verbenica.jpg today's photo depicting the whole plant PROPOLI87 16:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 16:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

 CommentHowever, I want to specify that the size of the flower at the time of the photo was a few centimeters, and now it is exactly classified and named.PROPOLI87 07:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 Support -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Gecina_-_octave_greard.jpg

• Nomination: Gecina - octave greard (by Gecina) --Sebring12Hrs 16:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  Good quality, yes, but there are dust spots in the sky to be removed --PantheraLeo1359531 18:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  I will try to remove them with Paint this week. But if someone wants to do it, he is welcome... --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't know how to edit out dust spots, but I will oppose for now and await your work to remove them later in the week. -- Ikan Kekek 08:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment New version uploaded but both versions are the first version for the moment... --Sebring12Hrs 17:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

The second version works .--Sebring12Hrs 17:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

No more dust spots, but check the tree on the right for purple CA. -- Ikan Kekek 20:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

You are right but I don't know how to remove those CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 23:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

 Answered This can be done in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic in the module Develop > Lens Corrections > Remove Chromatic Aberration --F. Riedelio 09:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Biddulph_Grange_2015_006.jpg

• Nomination Biddulph Grange house --Mike Peel 18:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
  The chimney-like structure on the right isn't very sharp. Otherwise QI. --aismallard 23:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  

@Aismallard: Good point, I've cropped the image to remove that, and a small thing that was appearing at the edge on the left as well. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Still increasing blurriness towards the edges of the image. Is the lens possibly decentered? Because the effect is much more pronounced on the right edge than on the left. By the way, I like the composition of the original version much better. --Smial 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Why is this in CR? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)