Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 13 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Гора_Парашка_0019.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Сколівські Бескиди, Сколівський, Дрогобицький, Турківський райони. By User:DmytroChapman --Ahonc 23:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Oversharpened. Have a look at the fringes of the clouds, please --Cccefalon 01:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
     Comment fringes of the clouds needs to be fixed --Denkmalhelfer 16:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC) sockpuppet. --Cccefalon 10:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 10:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Rathaus Ulm.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 16:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadtbibliothek Ulm - Zentralbibliothek.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination City library of Ulm, Germany -- Dr. Chriss 00:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This photo, as many others of the photographer is bearing visible and multiple stitching errors and cannot be a QI. --Cccefalon 01:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} as Cccefalon, see notes for the ghosts!--Hubertl 09:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} as Cccefalon --Denkmalhelfer 18:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Minus Trollvote --Hubertl 16:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think the errors had been fixed by author. -- Der Wolf im Wald 08:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Comment looks more worst as before, sorry --Denkmalhelfer 09:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Sure? What do you mean? I can only see many improvements... -- Der Wolf im Wald 09:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me now.--Hubertl 16:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support for new version --Cccefalon 05:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Som_et_lumiere.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Le Charmand Som et Grande Sure un jour de pluie --Brucyn 13:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Very nice scene and amazing light, but blurry, sorry. --Kadellar 15:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment to me its QI, please discuss. Why PNG? --Ralf Roletschek 20:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry,Kadellar have full right --Livioandronico2013 21:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded I made some CA corrections, it should improve sharpness slightly --Brucyn 23:02, 5 May

2015 (UTC)

  • {{o}} impresive picture but sorry no QI for me, noisy in dark parts. --Denkmalhelfer 05:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Bei allem gebotenem Respekt, Denkmalhelfer: Weißt du eigentlich was mit "Noisy" überhaupt gemeint ist oder wirfst du nur mit lustigen Buzzwords um Dich die du hier in den letzen Wochen aufgeschnappt hast? Leider ist der diesjährige Photoworkshop in Nürnberg schon vorbei, der nächste findet erst wieder im April statt. Ich lade dich dazu ein. Auch gab es in Hessen einen Anfängerworkshop, ebenfalls im April, frag mal Mich.Kramer, ob er wieder einen machen möchte. --Hubertl 00:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} What should be wrong here? The clouds and the light is very impresive --Derzno 09:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Du solltest erst mal die Regeln lesen (und verstehen) bevor du bewertest. --Denkmalhelfer 16:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose schönes Bild, Rauschen paßt und stört nicht. Aber falsches Dateiformat, Foto kann nie als PNG Qualität darstellen. --Ralf Roletschek 11:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)