Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 07 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Annette von Droste Hülshoff High School (and Forum Bendix) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Annette von Droste Hülshoff High School (and Forum Bendix) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Municipal library roof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Municipal library roof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dülmen horse (mare with foal) in Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dülmen pony in the Merfelder Bruch bei Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dülmen pony in the Merfelder Bruch bei Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wolfgang chapel on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wolfgang chapel on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal of the Wolfgang chapel on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal of the Wolfgang chapel on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Apses of the subsidiary church Saints Helena and Mary Magdalene on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Apses of the subsidiary church Saints Helena and Mary Magdalene on top of Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statues of travelers by Arun Yogiraj and clock tower, Mysuru (Mysore) Railway Station, Karnataka --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statues of travelers by Arun Yogiraj and clock tower, Mysuru (Mysore) Railway Station, Karnataka --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Asian openbill (Anastomus oscitans), Kabini Reservoir --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Asian openbill (Anastomus oscitans), Kabini Reservoir --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kabini Jungle Lodge boat jetty. Bandipur on distant shore. Karnataka --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kabini Jungle Lodge boat jetty. Bandipur on distant shore. Karnataka --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata), with fish prey in water, Kabini --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata), with fish prey in water, Kabini --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Purple heron (Ardea purpurea), front, Kabini Reservoir, Nagarhole --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Purple heron (Ardea purpurea), front, Kabini Reservoir, Nagarhole --Tagooty 01:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Name sign of the commune of Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, in French (above) and Alsatian (below). --Mathieu Kappler 01:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Name sign of the commune of Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, in French (above) and Alsatian (below). --Mathieu Kappler 01:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The pond of Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France. --Mathieu Kappler 01:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination The pond of Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France. --Mathieu Kappler 01:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Sarah Bouhaddi (Olympique Lyon, 16, goal keeper). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Sarah Bouhaddi (Olympique Lyon, 16, goal keeper). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Stephan Lerch (VfL Wolfsburg, head coach). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Stephan Lerch (VfL Wolfsburg, head coach). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Selma Bacha (Olympique Lyon, 4). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Selma Bacha (Olympique Lyon, 4). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Team photo VfL Wolfsburg. By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Team photo VfL Wolfsburg. By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Dzsenifer Marozsan (Olympique Lyon, 10). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Soccer, UEFA Women's Champions League: Dzsenifer Marozsan (Olympique Lyon, 10). By --Stepro 22:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wooden souvenir image of the 1933 pilgimage to the Holy Robe in Trier. --Palauenc05 20:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wooden souvenir image of the 1933 pilgimage to the Holy Robe in Trier. --Palauenc05 20:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 5th instar caterpillar (before pupation) of Pelopidas agna agna (Moore, 1866) – Bengal Obscure Branded Swift. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination 5th instar caterpillar (before pupation) of Pelopidas agna agna (Moore, 1866) – Bengal Obscure Branded Swift. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Trier - Brotstr 21-23; Built as 'Mattheiser Hof' in a late-baroque style, --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Trier - Brotstr 21-23; Built as 'Mattheiser Hof' in a late-baroque style, --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Trier - Brotstr 24; former cinema now used as bank; built 1938 --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Trier - Brotstr 24; former cinema now used as bank; built 1938 --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Trier - Sternstr. 3; Timber framed building - dated to 1475 by dendrochronology --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Trier - Sternstr. 3; Timber framed building - dated to 1475 by dendrochronology --Virtual-Pano 20:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 21:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Trier - Brotstr. 42; Department store "Blue Hand" Built around 1915 --Virtual-Pano 20:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Trier - Brotstr. 42; Department store "Blue Hand" Built around 1915 --Virtual-Pano 20:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mercedes-Benz GLC F-CELL at IAA 2017 --MB-one 20:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mercedes-Benz GLC F-CELL at IAA 2017 --MB-one 20:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 5th instar caterpillar of Pelopidas agna (Moore, 1866) - Obscure Branded Swift. Pelopidas agna agna (Moore, [1866]) – Bengal Obscure Branded Swift. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 20:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination 5th instar caterpillar of Pelopidas agna (Moore, 1866) - Obscure Branded Swift. Pelopidas agna agna (Moore, [1866]) – Bengal Obscure Branded Swift. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 20:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Freshly eclosed Pseudozizeeria maha – Pale Grass Blue. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Has DoF issues but as eye and and main part of wing are in focus it is a QI to me --Virtual-Pano 20:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Freshly eclosed Pseudozizeeria maha – Pale Grass Blue. By User:Sarpitabose --Bodhisattwa 20:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Has DoF issues but as eye and and main part of wing are in focus it is a QI to me --Virtual-Pano 20:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pupa of Pseudozizeeria maha. By User:Butterflyrajib --Bodhisattwa 20:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination BMW 327 from 1938 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination BMW 327 from 1938 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination BMW 535i from 1986 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination BMW 535i from 1986 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ford Escort MkIV at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ford Escort MkIV at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Devín Castle --Jakubhal 18:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 22:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Devín Castle --Jakubhal 18:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 22:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Port of Alicante --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Port of Alicante --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plaza de Los Luceros, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plaza de Los Luceros, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Explanada de España, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Explanada de España, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Excavator on Postiguet Beach, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Excavator on Postiguet Beach, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Postiguet Beach, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Postiguet Beach, Alicante. --Kallerna 17:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Neuschwanstein Castle (Bavaria) -- Created and uploaded by Dmytro Balkhovitin -- Nominated by -- Radomianin 16:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Someone might object that the light is very bright, but it's OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek 17:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Neuschwanstein Castle (Bavaria) -- Created and uploaded by Dmytro Balkhovitin -- Nominated by -- Radomianin 16:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Someone might object that the light is very bright, but it's OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek 17:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rapids of the Trubach between Wannbach and Unterzaunsbach --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rapids of the Trubach between Wannbach and Unterzaunsbach --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cherry orchard near Lützelsdorf in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 17:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cherry orchard near Lützelsdorf in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 17:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Easter fountain in Albertshof in Franconian Switzerland in Upper Franconia. --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 00:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Easter fountain in Albertshof in Franconian Switzerland in Upper Franconia. --Ermell 14:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 00:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Andreas Leitner, goalkeeper of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Andreas Leitner, goalkeeper of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Andreas Leitner, goalkeeper of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Andreas Leitner, goalkeeper of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ali Hamdemir, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ali Hamdemir, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ali Hamdemir, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ali Hamdemir, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 09:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Leopard on mount in Tsavo East National Park By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 09:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Leopard on mount in Tsavo East National Park By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 09:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Family of lions during the mating season in Masai Mara National Park. By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Family of lions during the mating season in Masai Mara National Park. By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Group giraffe in Masai Mara National Park. By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. The filename should be renamed to "Three_giraffes" after promotion, I suppose. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. And I quite like the picture, would vote for a feature, even. --UnpetitproleX 11:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment My feeling was that the giraffes blend too much into the grasses for this to be an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 13:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Group giraffe in Masai Mara National Park. By User:Byrdyak --Basile Morin 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. The filename should be renamed to "Three_giraffes" after promotion, I suppose. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. And I quite like the picture, would vote for a feature, even. --UnpetitproleX 11:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       Comment My feeling was that the giraffes blend too much into the grasses for this to be an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 13:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Erebia ligea (open wings) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. It's not a problem that the photo is not sharp when viewed at sizes far larger than life. -- Ikan Kekek 09:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Erebia ligea (open wings) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. It's not a problem that the photo is not sharp when viewed at sizes far larger than life. -- Ikan Kekek 09:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Erebia ligea (closed wings) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Erebia ligea (closed wings) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View from the Feldberg (Black forest) into the east (stitched panorama) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Very good quality! I think it would be interesting for other users how many individual photos are composed and which stitching program was used. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality and beautiful, I'd suggest adding a bit of text description too. --UnpetitproleX 14:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination View from the Feldberg (Black forest) into the east (stitched panorama) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Very good quality! I think it would be interesting for other users how many individual photos are composed and which stitching program was used. --Steindy 10:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality and beautiful, I'd suggest adding a bit of text description too. --UnpetitproleX 14:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Earleaf bellflower (Campanula cochleariifolia) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Very well done. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Earleaf bellflower (Campanula cochleariifolia) --Ssprmannheim 09:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Very well done. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Common sailor (Neptis hylas varmona) --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Common sailor (Neptis hylas varmona) --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Glassy tiger (Parantica aglea aglea) female --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Glassy tiger (Parantica aglea aglea) female --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Glassy tiger (Parantica aglea aglea) female --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Glassy tiger (Parantica aglea aglea) female --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Great eggly (Hypolimnas bolina bolina) male --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Great eggly (Hypolimnas bolina bolina) male --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Medus brown (Orsotriaena medus mandata) --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Medus brown (Orsotriaena medus mandata) --Charlesjsharp 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Part of the south side of Little Moreton Hall --Mike Peel 07:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Part of the south side of Little Moreton Hall --Mike Peel 07:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vacuum Tower Telescope, Teide Observatory --Mike Peel 07:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vacuum Tower Telescope, Teide Observatory --Mike Peel 07:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Daisy (Bellis perennis) (2 diopters) in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Daisy (Bellis perennis) (2 diopters) in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Addersmeat (Stellaria holostea) (2 diopters) in Trois-Épis (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Addersmeat (Stellaria holostea) (2 diopters) in Trois-Épis (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vlaardingen-NL, sculpture Pilaar met Waakzame ogen (Pillar with Watchful Eyes) designed by Joop Beljon --Michielverbeek 05:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vlaardingen-NL, sculpture Pilaar met Waakzame ogen (Pillar with Watchful Eyes) designed by Joop Beljon --Michielverbeek 05:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vlaardingen-NL, sculpture Pilaar met Waakzame ogen (Pillar with Watchful Eyes) designed by Joop Beljon --Michielverbeek 05:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vlaardingen-NL, sculpture Pilaar met Waakzame ogen (Pillar with Watchful Eyes) designed by Joop Beljon --Michielverbeek 05:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kampen, Molenbrug (suspended cable-stayed bridge) over the IJssel. (northwest side) --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statues of travelers by Arun Yogiraj, view from front, Mysuru (Mysore) Railway Station, Karnataka --Tagooty 01:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  SupportGood quality. --UnpetitproleX 02:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Hi, Tagooty. This is something different and fun - art imitating the typical behavior of tourists. I think it could be worth nominating your best photo of this group of statues to FPC and seeing how it does. Do you think this is your best photo of it, or is there another one, perhaps one you haven't nominated yet, that you like better? -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statues of travelers by Arun Yogiraj, view from front, Mysuru (Mysore) Railway Station, Karnataka --Tagooty 01:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 01:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
       SupportGood quality. --UnpetitproleX 02:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
      Hi, Tagooty. This is something different and fun - art imitating the typical behavior of tourists. I think it could be worth nominating your best photo of this group of statues to FPC and seeing how it does. Do you think this is your best photo of it, or is there another one, perhaps one you haven't nominated yet, that you like better? -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruins at Kafir Kot by JamilAkhtar --UnpetitproleX 00:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - L'Eden, extension qui hébergeait, jusqu’en 2000, l’école provinciale de la Samaritaine. --Jmh2o 19:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - L'Eden, extension qui hébergeait, jusqu’en 2000, l’école provinciale de la Samaritaine. --Jmh2o 19:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tampere Theatre --Kallerna 16:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tampere Theatre --Kallerna 16:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Makhachkala view from the Tarki village. --Alexander Novikov 14:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Makhachkala view from the Tarki village. --Alexander Novikov 14:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Лютик, Ranunculus. Парк 'Сокольники', Восточный округ, Москва --Ulaisaeva 14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Лютик, Ranunculus. Парк 'Сокольники', Восточный округ, Москва --Ulaisaeva 14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mirnes Becirovic, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt (red dress). --Steindy 13:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mirnes Becirovic, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt (red dress). --Steindy 13:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Easter fountain in Heiligenstadt in Oberfranken --Ermell 07:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Easter fountain in Heiligenstadt in Oberfranken --Ermell 07:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Maastricht-NL, statue of Jan Pieter Minckelers --Michielverbeek 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Maastricht-NL, statue of Jan Pieter Minckelers --Michielverbeek 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres) on Baltrum --Ssprmannheim 19:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Noise reduction is necessary. --Ermell 08:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC) I uploaded a new version with a little more noise reduction (and also a different crop) --Ssprmannheim 12:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres) on Baltrum --Ssprmannheim 19:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Noise reduction is necessary. --Ermell 08:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
      I uploaded a new version with a little more noise reduction (and also a different crop) --Ssprmannheim 12:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western coast of the Darß, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --Milseburg 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western coast of the Darß, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --Milseburg 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western coast of the Darß, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --Milseburg 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western coast of the Darß, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --Milseburg 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Construction of Joseph's cross from the 19th century in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Construction of Joseph's cross from the 19th century in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tanzende Türme (Dancing Towers) in Hamburg --Kritzolina 06:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC) * Decline Good quality, but would you mind to add geocodie to the nominated frames? --Virtual-Pano 19:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC) Sorry, but geocoordinates are something I never really looked into - I do not feel comfortable doing this --Kritzolina 06:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC) One of the criteria for Quality images is value. Simply supplying the name of a landmark is not sufficient. Adding the camera location, point of view or seen from ..... would help and there are free tools e.g. GeoSetter to add coordinates to digital images --Virtual-Pano 14:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Oppose Composition: Too much empty sky above the building (the bottom of which is also covered by plants). --Sitacuisses 20:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tanzende Türme (Dancing Towers) in Hamburg --Kritzolina 06:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
      Good quality, but would you mind to add geocodie to the nominated frames? --Virtual-Pano 19:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
      Sorry, but geocoordinates are something I never really looked into - I do not feel comfortable doing this --Kritzolina 06:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
      One of the criteria for Quality images is value. Simply supplying the name of a landmark is not sufficient. Adding the camera location, point of view or seen from ..... would help and there are free tools e.g. GeoSetter to add coordinates to digital images --Virtual-Pano 14:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
       Oppose Composition: Too much empty sky above the building (the bottom of which is also covered by plants). --Sitacuisses 20:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Photo of the Gate №102 from the Tbilisi International Airport Terminal in Georgia --Reda Kerbouche 04:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Photo of the Gate №102 from the Tbilisi International Airport Terminal in Georgia --Reda Kerbouche 04:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Miele integrated fully automatic coffee machine at Internationale Funkausstellung 2018, Berlin --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Miele integrated fully automatic coffee machine at Internationale Funkausstellung 2018, Berlin --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Hotel Ibis Friedrichshafen Airport --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Hotel Ibis Friedrichshafen Airport --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Тhe Lower Karanay village in Republic of Dagestan. --Alexander Novikov 17:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Тhe Lower Karanay village in Republic of Dagestan. --Alexander Novikov 17:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Mountain pasture near the Lower Karanay village. --Alexander Novikov 17:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Mountain pasture near the Lower Karanay village. --Alexander Novikov 17:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Khab Spiti road by Gerd Eichmann --UnpetitproleX 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Ringebu Stave Church, Oppland, Norway. By User:Øyvind Holmstad --Hangman'sDeath 12:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * Review Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 13:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Vinca minor. By User:Mister rf --Hangman'sDeath 12:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * Review  Comment Good detail. But the color looks unreal. Lots of such plants grow around me and the color looks much different. (See this example or here.) --Johannes Robalotoff 19:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Kafir Kot ruins by JamilAkhtar --UnpetitproleX 11:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * Review chromatic aberrations need removing but looks pretty good otherwise.--Peulle 12:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC) I did remove the CAs -UnpetitproleX 01:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Aufgang zu den Bahnsteigen 1 und 2 am Bahnhof Floridsdorf By User:Linie29 --Hangman'sDeath 11:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * Review Can image noise be reduced and image sharpness increased? --Steindy 13:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Aufgang zu den Bahnsteigen 1 und 2 am Bahnhof Floridsdorf By User:Linie29 --Hangman'sDeath 11:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review
      Can image noise be reduced and image sharpness increased? --Steindy 13:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Dal lake by Camouflaged —UnpetitproleX 09:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination Huis 't Sestich in Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium. --Tournasol7 08:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Huis 't Sestich in Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium. --Tournasol7 08:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sandro Zakany, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 08:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sandro Zakany, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 08:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wall of Narikala Fortress, Tbilisi, Georgia --Reda Kerbouche 07:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wall of Narikala Fortress, Tbilisi, Georgia --Reda Kerbouche 07:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vysokopetrovsky Monastery, Krapivenskiy Pereulok side, Moscow, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 07:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose posterization effects. --MB-one 20:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vysokopetrovsky Monastery, Krapivenskiy Pereulok side, Moscow, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 07:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose posterization effects. --MB-one 20:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cultural monument deaconesses' home in Hassloch --F. Riedelio 06:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Not enough detail visible --MB-one 20:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cultural monument deaconesses' home in Hassloch
      --F. Riedelio 06:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Not enough detail visible --MB-one 20:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Alberobello dall'alto (by Maurizio Moro5153) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC) * Review Good quality, but doesn't it need an aerial category? -- Ikan Kekek 21:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Alberobello dall'alto (by Maurizio Moro5153) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Review Good quality, but doesn't it need an aerial category? -- Ikan Kekek 21:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Diamond roundel signage in Darjeeling railway station--Subhrajyoti07 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Error in the description (duplicate text), visible violett chromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 06:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment - Corrected -Subhrajyoti07 13:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Diamond roundel signage in Darjeeling railway station--Subhrajyoti07 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Error in the description (duplicate text), visible violett chromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 06:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
       Comment - Corrected -Subhrajyoti07 13:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination La Bâtiaz Castle in 2022. --Espandero 09:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Template {{Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland|nnnn}} would be desirable. --F. Riedelio 05:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 15:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC) The link to the cultural property protection number does not work (maybe the template is incorrect). --F. Riedelio 16:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC) I think it's an issue with the website or the template because it doesn't work for any link (I tried it with this one and this one too). - Espandero 08:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination La Bâtiaz Castle in 2022. --Espandero 09:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Template {{Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland|nnnn}} would be desirable. --F. Riedelio 05:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done - Espandero 15:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
      The link to the cultural property protection number does not work (maybe the template is incorrect). --F. Riedelio 16:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
      I think it's an issue with the website or the template because it doesn't work for any link (I tried it with this one and this one too). - Espandero 08:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panorama of the Sulhna Lake by gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 00:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Unfavorable file format (136 MB), jpg is preferred. What is the {{personality rights}} template for? --F. Riedelio 15:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Fixed @F. Riedelio: I have converted the file to .jpg format. The original uploader seems to have put the personality rights warning on all pictures from here. --UnpetitproleX 20:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)  Weak support --F. Riedelio 07:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panorama of the Sulhna Lake by gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 00:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Unfavorable file format (136 MB), jpg is preferred. What is the {{personality rights}} template for? --F. Riedelio 15:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
      Fixed @F. Riedelio: I have converted the file to .jpg format. The original uploader seems to have put the personality rights warning on all pictures from here. --UnpetitproleX 20:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
       Weak support --F. Riedelio 07:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Blick vom Josephskreuz HOF06051 RAW-Export 20220427002420.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from Joseph's cross to the north. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Yes, but first a more meaningful filename is needed. --Milseburg 22:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Agreed, QI but needs a better filename. --Aismallard 00:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Thank you, renaming instructed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Milseburg and Aismallard: Just FYI: The file has been renamed. --Aristeas 07:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good filename now and quite a nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Better, but good? Everything after "Blick vom Josephskreuz" is useless ballast. A specification of the direction would be better. But no reason for opposing any more. --Milseburg (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Eurasian_Hoopoe_Nagarhole_Karnataka_Apr22_D72_24128.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Eurasian Hoopoe (Upupa epops), Nagarhole Tiger Reserve, Karnataka --Tagooty 03:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too noisy, sorry. --Steindy 21:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment To me, the hoopoe is sharp and clear. I've applied NR to the background. --Tagooty 06:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support ISO 1800 is a lot, but it seems as if it had been appropriate for the conditions. I find the effects of the resulting noise still tolerable. Detail is not washed out too much by noise reduction. (Telephoto images of small animals have been promoted with worse noise recuction artifacts here.) Thus I would say this is a good image. --JRff (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Quite noisy, indeed. --Palauenc05 15:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpened, and the image noise right along with it. --Smial 13:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, a bit noisy, for OK for QI standards
  •  Oppose The preceding reviewer needs to sign. I come down on the side of noisy and oversharpened. -- Ikan Kekek 18:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

File:SV_Mattersburg_vs._SK_Rapid_Wien_2015-11-21_(137).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Patrick Farkas, player of SV Mattersburg. --Steindy 19:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fingertips of right hand are missing. --Imehling 04:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Do the fingertips really matter in a soccer player? Here portraits became QIs with part of the head or hair missing. --Steindy 22:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • I think in this case they are important because what makes the picture interesting is the gesture of the player, but let's have a discussion about that. --Imehling 10:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Steindy and furthermore too much noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 19:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for a game photo, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
  • It's an interesting discussion, we have had it before (on this image, see archives here) but with an inconclusive result after 10 votes. I am still leaning towards Ihmeling's point, that the gesture the person is making makes the hand relevant. I therefore  Oppose like last time. --Peulle 07:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Peulle: I've been photographing sports and especially football matches for around 45 years. I have done part-time photography for newspapers, magazines and books. Yes, and I know I must be a crappy photographer by reading your reviews and those of some of my colleagues here. So I'm wondering why I've had success with my photos? Maybe because I knew what was important. A good sports photo has to live, a good sports photo should show emotions. A player's fingertips are the last thing that matters when celebrating a goal. I'm not going to ask you how many sports photos you've taken, how many times you've photographed football matches. I only ask that you refrain from judging my photos. That's enough for me now because apart from criticism (see also your question about the picture size above) you have nothing left for my photos. Regards --Steindy 21:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
  • No, I am not going to refrain from judging your photos. It is not up to photographers of the Commons project to decide who reviews their QIC nominations. Your argument that I have something against your work in particular is also facile, as is evident by the fact that I have promoted many of your photos in the past. My opinion of this specific image's composition is valid, as is seen by the fact that it is shared by other users. I have no strong opinion on this; if a majority of votes were to disagree with me, I'd be perfectly happy to accept that. Since there was no clear consensus against the opinion in the last discussion, however, no clear precedent was set and I must vote the same way as last time. If you persist in your passive-aggressive attacks against reviewers here on Commons, we can defer the matter to COM:ANU.--Peulle 07:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • @Peulle: E.O.D. for me. I realize that based on your experience, you are the only true expert whose point of view is absolutely correct. Just stop thinking about arguments and stand firm in your opinion! --Steindy (talk) 19:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Your link is 404. Please fix it. -- Ikan Kekek 21:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I don't know why. Please try to search on google: "Sascha Steinbach Fußballfotografie" --Steindy (talk) 23:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The image is a bit soft, but still ok. The hand that is cut off is acceptable for me. Steindy's link is [[1]] --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  • I couldn't see that particular example either.--Peulle 22:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very noisy, unfortunate crop. --Tagooty 03:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the best but good -- Spurzem 19:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Missing fingers. Charlesjsharp 16:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was hoping for a clearer result this time; if I vote to oppose an image and I lose that vote 1-6, it's easy to change my point of view and say: "Hey, the community disagrees with me, so apparently, I'm wrong on this issue." As it is, opinion is instead divided. I respect the opinions of users who are contrary to my own, but given this result, I cannot agree that I am in the wrong either. I shall continue to follow this guideline if similar images appear in the future, and I suppose we'll have to vote on them individually since no clear presedence is set.--Peulle 06:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Due to very bad experiences in the past, I have long since refrained from voting on Steindy's photos unless I saw very gross misjudgements. Of course, I had an opinion on this picture as well... --Smial 18:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Panorama-Domburg-2022.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panoramic view over Domburg --Tuxyso 14:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not yet. There are some dust spots right above the horizon line too remove. The sea level could be more straight. --Milseburg 19:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks, please take another look. --Tuxyso 22:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please check the horizon. It's not quite straight and has a few steps. I know that part of the Netherlands is below sea level, but it amazes me that the horizon on the far right is so significantly * below the level of the sea on the left. Sorry to be niggeling. --Milseburg 19:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Thanks again, Milseburg, but I think my pano is fine. Please take a look at the digital elevation model of this area (below). I took the pano from Domburg, and the inner land is between 0-2m below see level (see link below). --Tuxyso 21:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment At the beginning horizon ist slightly tilted cw. At the end treetops at horizon should definitely be above sea level. They have more then 2m.--Milseburg 08:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I can't tell whether there's a subtle tilt to the horizon, but the photo looks quite good to me. There might be a tiny phantom stitching seam, but it could be a streak of mist. I'd welcome for someone else to look at this. -- Ikan Kekek 18:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Digital elevation model: https://ahn.arcgisonline.nl/ahnviewer/?extent=18261.8123%2C389831.245%2C42645.861%2C402429.6702%2C28992

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_May_07_2022&oldid=750142848"