Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 27 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Walnut tree north of the cemetery in Deinsberg, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Focus good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stone arch bridge across the Silver brook with wayside shrine and statue of John of Nepomuk, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, sharp photo. Sun-problem in right top corner well done --Michielverbeek 04:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC) Comment @Michielverbeek: Thanks for your specific in-depth comments on my images. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: Shakhovskoy Mansion --A.Savin 01:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Of course the building is beautiful, but the icy road reflecting the sky is an added special element. -- Ikan Kekek 02:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: Petrovsko-Razumovskaya metro station --A.Savin 01:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 02:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: Ugreshskaya (MCC) railway halt --A.Savin 01:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. Nice long depth of field. -- Ikan Kekek 02:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: Shelepiha (MCC) railway halt --A.Savin 01:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 02:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farming business in Woudfennen bij Joure (in the Netherlands).
--Famberhorst 18:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Farming business in Woudfennen bij Joure (in the Netherlands).
-
- Nomination Narcissus in the park (at the Weseler Straße) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of the Virgin am Aegidiikirchplatz, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline This one is not a QI to me. It could become one the net would be the subject (with a different crop), but the net is too distracting versus the sculpture in the back, sorry. --Poco a poco 21:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Artium art museum. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Estibaliz monastery. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Estibaliz monastery. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture at Estibaliz monastery. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing position of Male Delias agostina Hewitson, 1852 – Yellow Jezebel. By User:Atudu --Bodhisattwa 16:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The island of Giudecca, the Giudecca Canal, Dorsoduro, the Canal Grande on Easter 2013 in Venice. View from the belltower of the Basilica di San Giorgio Maggiore --Moroder 15:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice view! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tilottama Majumdar during the Apeejay Bangla Sahitya Utsab. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Bodhisattwa 15:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy, loss of details because of noise reduction, not a QI for me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ustad Mohammad Hussain - Ahmed and Mohammed Hussain -Indian Ghazal singers --Suyash.dwivedi 14:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 17:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ustad Ahmed Hussain - Ahmed and Mohammed Hussain -Indian Ghazal singers --Suyash.dwivedi 14:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hofwirt restaurant in Seckau, Styria --Uoaei1 14:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit unsharp towards the borders but IMO still acceptable. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skeleton of a Sperm Whale, Physeter macrocephalus, Morro Jable, Fuerteventura --Llez 13:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of Agave americana --Llez 12:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination [edit][edit] Close wing position of Appias lyncida, Cramer, 1777 – Chocolate Albatross WLB. By User:Sayan911 --Bodhisattwa 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port of Paracas, Peru --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Puca Pucara, Cuzco, Peru --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Info There is a dust spot in the sky, could you please remove it? --Llez 15:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 21:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Square near St Catalina church and covent, Cusco, Peru --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agricultural terraces, Pisac, Cuzco, Peru --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archbishopric religious art museum, Cusco, Peru --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 01:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling fresco in the Basilica Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a saint at the Gnadenaltar in the basilica of Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a saint at the Gnadenaltar in the basilica of Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a saint at the Gnadenaltar in the basilica of Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of a saint at the Gnadenaltar in the basilica of Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination By beech leaf grown Crocus ( Crocus).
--Famberhorst 06:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination By beech leaf grown Crocus ( Crocus).
-
- Nomination Dredging on the Langwarder Wielen from motor ship Christiana in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 06:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Dredging on the Langwarder Wielen from motor ship Christiana in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Ruin of the abbey church of Paulinzella abbey in Thuringia, Germany. --Code 06:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
-
- Nomination Landscape south of Deinsberg with pilgrimage church and churchyard in Maria Hilf #5, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern view of rectory, pilgrimage church and churchyard in Maria Hilf #5, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pilgrimage church and churchyard in Maria Hilf #5, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint James the Greater and Saint Anne in Deinsberg, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good focus to church, but I think just a bit too much air --Michielverbeek 06:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Comment @Michielverbeek: You are absolutely right. Sadly I am in lack of a longer focal length than 200 mm and I was too far away from the motive. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque charnel house at the cemetery in Deinsberg, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow: entrance building of Botanichesky Sad metro station --A.Savin 00:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hindu marriage ceremony and its rituals process in Nepal, taking grandmother water through grand daughter's leg. --Bijaya2043 02:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hindu marriage ceremony and its rituals process in Nepal, Mother and daughter in law playing with rice competition. --Bijaya2043 02:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Good motiv but the hand in the center should be in focus.Sorry --Ermell 07:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nepali color festival Holi celebrating at Lalitpur, Nepal. --Bijaya2043 14:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Great catch, but noisy --Daniel Case 02:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The flag of Canada, the Flag of Quebec and the flag of Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean seen at Chicoutimi along the Saguenay River, Quebec, Canada. --0x010C 08:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Too much of image is unsharp --Daniel Case 02:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The flag of Canada, the Flag of Quebec and the flag of Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean seen at Chicoutimi along the Saguenay River, Quebec, Canada. --0x010C 08:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Flags in rear are very unsharp and there is CA on the maple leaf --Daniel Case 02:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House accompanying St Matthews Church, Albury NSW -- Thennicke 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion One would wish for just a little bit less exposure, but perhaps your situation dictated this --Daniel Case 02:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bahia Palace, Marrakech, Morocco. By User:Bgag --Reda benkhadra 22:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Has perspective and CA issues. Daniel Case 03:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Bahia Palace, Marrakech, Morocco. By User:Bgag --Reda benkhadra 22:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House on Chania walls. --C messier 17:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The verticals should be as vertical as possible.--Ermell 20:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment Given that the camera points quite upwards, I though that goinh all the way with perspective correction would make the photo quite deformed. --C messier 15:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I meant only the sides of the tall building in the middle. I agree with you in relation to the other lines.--Ermell 14:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC) - Decline Insufficient quality. --Ermell 17:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination House on Chania walls. --C messier 17:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The verticals should be as vertical as possible.--Ermell 20:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ainoa shopping centre in Tapiola, Espoo, Finland. --Msaynevirta 21:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Leaning in. Perspective has to be corrected.--Ermell 20:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --Ermell 17:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Koivusaari metro station's entrance in March 2017. --Msaynevirta 21:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Maybe you can fix the stitching error in the "rock belt".--Ermell 20:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --Ermell 17:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Swastika_Mukherjee_-_Kolkata_2015-10-10_5787.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Swastika Mukhopadhyay during the Apeejay Bangla Sahitya Utsab. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Bodhisattwa 15:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too noisy, loss of details because of noise reduction, not a QI for me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support. It is noisy indeed but nevertheless an excellent photo for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Much noise and half the face is unsharp, a big no vote from me.--Peulle 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 23:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle --Sandro Halank 09:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --A.Savin 03:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Open_wing_position_of_Charaxes_bernardus_Fabricius,_1793_–_Tawny_Rajah_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Open wing of Charaxes bernardus Fabricius, 1793 – Tawny Rajah. By User:Tamaghna Sengupta --Bodhisattwa 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Below 2 megapixels. --A.Savin 12:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Below 2 megapixels.--Peulle 14:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Spurzem, why are you attempting to promote images that are below the minimum size? In this case, it was completely obvious just by giving a cursory look at the dimensions; you didn't even have any reason to resort to a calculator. Please stop. -- Ikan Kekek 23:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I think he just oversaw it, I've already made the same mistake, we shouldn't worry about it. --Basotxerri 09:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- The problem with Spurzem is not at all new, unfortunately. --A.Savin 16:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
File:2017-02-24_Miriam_Kastlunger_by_Sandro_Halank.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Miriam Kastlunger beim Nationencup-Rennen der Frauen in Altenberg 2017 --Sandro Halank 22:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Spurzem 23:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Below 2 megapixels --A.Savin 00:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Yep, the minimum size is not optional. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Under the limit. Spurzem must have missed it. --Peulle 12:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- I hope you're right that he's just missing it, repeatedly, and not willfully ignoring it. -- Ikan Kekek 23:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
File:16-09-01-Rīgas_Starptautiskā_Lidosta-RR2_4568.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Beladung eines Airbus A320-200 der Lufthansa am Flugplatz RigaLatviešu: Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Missing identification of the aircraft. --A.Savin 15:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)- Support I see no reason to decline. The image is O.K. for me. -- Spurzem 20:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - Inadequate categorization, per A.Savin.-- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)- Done I know, maybe I shouldn't do so because Ralf should know about categorisation but on this rainy day I've got the two minutes to fix it. --Basotxerri 10:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Basotxerri 10:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Fine now. Thanks to Basotxerri.--Peulle 13:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Now fine. -- Ikan Kekek 03:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 03:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Colonna_di_San_Marco_e_San_Teodoro_piazzetta_San_Marco_Venezia.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of theColonna del Leone di San Marco and the Colonna di San Teodoro columns with the Biblioteca Marciana on the Piazzetta San Marco square in Venice --Moroder 07:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment The tops of the columns look distorted, especially the right one. I'm not sure that can be fixed but I'll give you a chance to have a look at it.--Peulle 08:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment That comes with the perspective correction.
There is no way to do it differently.
- Done Thanks. I've tried a bit of an audacious operation. If you like I can reverse to a version without perspective correction. Cheers --Moroder 08:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I see what you did there - there is now a straight line stitching error in the middle of the image. Honestly, this is really hard; I think possibly unfixable and those colums really are important since they're the subject. That means Oppose, but I would also really like to hear what other reviewers have to say about it. Going CR for more input from our fellows.--Peulle 10:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Done Fixed the stitching error. Thanks for the hint --Moroder 12:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment That comes with the perspective correction.
- Support IMHO, this image has good quality. As I was several times in Venice, I know how hard it is, to get some photos of the two columns without perspective distortion. And this picture is really good. -- Johann Jaritz 17:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support QI for me--Ermell 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
File:17-02-15-Lietadlá_Ministerstva_vnútra_slovenské_republiky-RR2_7932.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lietadlá Ministerstva vnútra slovenské republiky --Ralf Roletschek 23:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Nice composition, subject sits in focus, nice lighting. Very acceptable grain. --Gorlingor 00:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Another crop of the same picture is already QI. --A.Savin 02:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support - As I recall, when you declined a bunch of similar photos of a bird in India, it was clearly established in CR that similarity to other photos is not a usable criterion for declining a QI nomination. That being the case, this is an image of good quality, and therefore, I support. -- Ikan Kekek 02:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is not just a similar photo, this is same photo. --A.Savin 14:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Grain acceptable for these lighting conditions. As for multiple versions of images, the Guidelines separate between FP and QI: "Normally there should never be two featured pictures that are just different versions of the same image, (...) There is no restriction on the number of similar quality images (...)"--Peulle 07:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Info this are different pictures, see EXIF (F8F0C93348793E571F97A10E98885FB2; 15. Feb. 2017, 17:41:10 / EE9565CFEF0A3FE4286AA3B25A86C823; 15. Feb. 2017, 17:41:09) In background branches left, window right are different - both photos have the full pixel number in width (4288) --Ralf Roletschek 07:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment So, both pictures were taken within 1 second, which means that serial shooting was used. For this kind of motif, I don't understand the real need of serial shooting; albeit I myself occasioinally use it for dynamic motives, e.g. this photo or this one were parts of serial shootings, each are best ones of their series of six, seven, eight,... (my camera can up to ten) shots taken within one second. With that said, serial shooting is indeed a good tool for many dynamic motives to choose the best managed shot. But when someone makes serial shooting of a building, a sculpture, a parking vehicle (like here), so that all photos are actually nothing but duplicates, and then uploads them all, and then wants them all to become QI, this may only have one sense: QI as self-purpose, just to push the QI count to have a babel on one's userpage with a claim like "This user has uploaded 37,421 Quality images on Commons". Anyone who supports such behaviour, apparently hasn't understood what QI/FP is for. One more reason for me to abandon any participation in QIC, just like I have abandoned participating on VIC years ago.. --A.Savin 00:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'd also like to add that this photo is insufficiently categorized. This is definitely in contrary with Image guidelines. --A.Savin 00:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- The model of plane should be mentioned and categorized, if possible. But your other objection seems to amount to a proposal to change QI rules, based on previous and current discussion. If so, why don't you propose a clear rules change on the talk page? -- Ikan Kekek 04:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the arguments of A.Savin. I think we have to discuss this. Because this i withdraw at this point? --Ralf Roletschek 16:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 03:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Maserati_BW_2016-04-30_13-55-31.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Maserati 3500 GT Spyder --Berthold Werner 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Tilted CCW, could you correct it, please? --Basotxerri 19:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Not done after 8 days--Michielverbeek 08:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Done now it's done ;-) --Berthold Werner 18:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Not done after 8 days--Michielverbeek 08:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 16:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support The persons in behind should not be there but the car is o.k.--Ermell 07:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support علاء 08:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support QI to me.--Sandro Halank 09:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral. The trade mark over the radiator grille is not sharp und the slips of paper behind the wipers are very disturbing for me. -- Spurzem 20:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 03:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)