Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 24 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:מנהרת_הטמפלרים.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Treasures in the Walls Museum, Acre, Israel. By User:Eladdror --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 09:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose too dark, misleading title --Charlesjsharp 21:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question - Good photo to me, but what's wrong with the title? Is this not a tunnel the Templars used? -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I can not judge if the title is correct and if google translates it correctly. The term does not seem to appear in the description text. It might be a local term. But technically I find the photo actually convincing, also the composition is well done. The atmosphere of a sparsely lit tunnel is hit, the picture is sharp and has no excessive noise. --Smial 17:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Impressive image and good quality -- Spurzem 19:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 17:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

File:20191215_Jezioro_Puszkar_i_ghaty_na_jego_północno-wschodnim_brzegu_0937_8641.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pushkar Lake and ghats on its North-Eastern bank --Jakubhal 20:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose too similar to the other --Charlesjsharp 20:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
    • This is not the same frame. Also there is no such criterion here. Many people publish series of photos of one object here, nobody protests and I don't understand why my photo should be treated differently. --Jakubhal 08:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
      • guidlines say 'Carefully select your best images to nominate' --Charlesjsharp 10:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
        • So, I did. I have many more pictures of the lake from that moment but I have selected two with different frames and angles. --Jakubhal 13:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. --Carschten 18:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 19:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Seven Pandas 20:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Duisburg,_Bergheim,_Christus_König,_2020-03_CN-02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Catholic Church of Christ the King in Duisburg-Bergheim --Carschten 20:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose we wouldn't usually promote two nearly identical images --Charlesjsharp 20:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment useless argument: different point of view (look at the road sign), different crop. --Carschten 21:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question - Could you link the other photo? -- Ikan Kekek 19:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality is good. It may well be that nominating similar images can strain the interest of the reviewers. Nobody has to check similar pictures if they don't want to. But maybe another reviewer. --Milseburg 12:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. Different enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Format and crop make a difference for me. --Aristeas 14:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_Summit_2019,_Berlin_(P1080142).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination City tour after Wikimedia Summit 2019 --MB-one 12:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Looks like a holiday snapshot, sorry --Podzemnik 19:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • @Podzemnik: Can you please be more specific? --MB-one 11:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well if it's a portrait, then it's good quite busy background. If it's a picture of the building, then the person is really distruptive. --Podzemnik 01:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's a person in front of a building. Both elements are deliberate. Please discuss. --MB-one 19:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. What´s the subject here? The building or the person? The composition is not convincing. --Milseburg 12:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition doesn't convince me either, sorry --Moroder 13:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)