Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 15 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Astragalus_angustifolius_subsp_angustifolius_RF.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weg_auf_dem_Plankenstein_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Forest track on Plankenstein in Franconian Switzerland --Plozessor 05:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorry, but I disagree. There are visible CAs where the sky shines through. --Zinnmann 08:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
  • @Zinnmann: You're right. Unfortunately, I don't have the raw file of this picture anymore, but I tried to fix the CAs as much as possible. Please have another look. --Plozessor 04:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, definitely an improvement. I'm still not sure, if it's a quality image, but I'm no longer opposing. --Zinnmann (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low detail, not a QI to me, sorry Poco a poco 20:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support given the high resolution it's passable IMO. --MB-one 10:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)