Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 06 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Guardia Civil Quarters, Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 19:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street in Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 19:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 22:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Our Lady of the Angels, Burbáguena, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 19:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Halavar 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination North rampart and patrol path, Brouage, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 17:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Towers of Resurrection Gate. Red Square, Moscow, Russia. --Halavar 16:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too tight crop, sorry --Poco a poco 19:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acherontia atropos --Archaeodontosaurus 16:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brassica oleracea var. botrytis --Coyau 15:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not really sharp --Poco a poco 19:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculptures of Surya at the Sun Temple, Modhera. --Bgag 15:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impression of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord at golden hour. --Martin Falbisoner 13:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impression of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord at golden hour. --Martin Falbisoner 13:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impression of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord at blue hour. --Martin Falbisoner 13:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Rachel Sandoz et Caribaldi --Pleclown 12:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PierreSelim 13:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - Laconnex --Pleclown 12:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pompeii, forum, Macellum, fresco --Berthold Werner 12:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chevrolet 1956, Modelo BelAir, Modernizado impecablemente --Ivan2010 12:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Crop is too tight. --Arctic Kangaroo 13:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inscription. Church of San Martí de La Cortinada, Ordino, Andorra. -36 --Lmbuga 11:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mill and sawmill of Cal Pal. La Cortinada. Ordino. Andorra -35 --Lmbuga 11:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tobacco plantation, Escaldes, Andorra -68 --Lmbuga 11:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountains in Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra -179 --Lmbuga 11:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 150148 at Sheffield. Mattbuck 08:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 07:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Probably somewhat too high colour saturation? --Smial 10:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC) Done Maybe... new version a bit less satured, thanks --Christian Ferrer 11:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Einsiedeln: UBS Ilge, listed building --Taxiarchos228 07:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lytse Mâr in de de Alde Feanen.--
Famberhorst 05:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Lytse Mâr in de de Alde Feanen.--
-
- Nomination Lamps, Marrakesh --Alurín 22:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shop lamps at Djeema el Fna, Marrakesh --Alurín 22:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Either too small (below 2 MP) or blurry --Poco a poco 19:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculptures in Sophiental --Hydro 20:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me --Lewis Hulbert 11:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montón, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 10:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 10:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pinares de Rodeno, Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 10:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City Canal and Millennium Dome. Mattbuck 08:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The site of Otterington railway station. Mattbuck 07:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Needs tiny perspective correction. --P e z i 20:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
The poles aren't actually vertical. Mattbuck 23:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Perhaps you are right, but to me it seems more obvious that the axis of vision was pointing down in this shot. --P e z i 08:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I think I did that before uploading. Parts of the wire seem vertical anyway. Mattbuck 12:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion OK - convinced. --P e z i 19:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The site of Otterington railway station. Mattbuck 07:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Needs tiny perspective correction. --P e z i 20:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King's Cross station. Mattbuck 07:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment I don't know nothing of interior photos, but this one seems underexposed, and much more dark than the reality in a station IMO Christian Ferrer 08:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Done, but also I withdraw my nomination because I don't believe this is sharp enough for QI. Mattbuck 21:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Obereggenen_-_Evangelische_Kirche3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Obereggenen: Protestant Church, bell tower --Taxiarchos228 21:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Tilted clockwise IMO. Mattbuck 18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done. --Mattbuck 23:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
this image is not tilted, you choose a wrong benchmark. BTW: didn't you say you wouldn't make any comments on my picture? Was apparently just nuts. --Taxiarchos228 19:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:McLaren_MP4-12C_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_004.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Une McLaren MP4-12C présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. However, I do agree that at present, the composition is not great. Please either show the full car or crop more off on the left to balance it out a bit. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:McLaren_MP4-12C_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_006.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Une McLaren MP4-12C présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. That said, Oppose due to bad focus. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:McLaren_P1_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_005.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Une McLaren P1 présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Picture doesn't mean much imho --Arctic Kangaroo 17:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm changing to discuss because I think the decline reason given by User:Arctic Kangaroo is not valid under QI rules. I think this one is ok - Support. --Mattbuck 00:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC) - Support ok from me Pleclown 12:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Mazda_6_-_Mondial_de_l'automobile_2012_-_004.jpg
[edit]- Nomination La Mazda 6 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile 2012 à Paris. --Thesupermat 07:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion It looks weird with this closeup from an awkward angle. Perhaps shooting it from the front would have been better. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
It needs a fix for chromatic noise, but the shot otherwise is fine. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC) - Support ok from me Pleclown 12:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Mazda_6_-_Mondial_de_l'automobile_2012_-_005.jpg
[edit]- Nomination La Mazda 6 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile 2012 à Paris. --Thesupermat 07:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion It looks weird with this closeup from an awkward angle. Perhaps shooting it from the front would have been better. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Seems ok to me. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC) - Support ok from me Pleclown 12:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Maize_field_in_Bavaria_in_Summer_2013.JPG
[edit]- Nomination A Maize field in Bavaria in Summer 2013. --High Contrast 20:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I like it, but I'm not convinced by the focus. Weak support Mattbuck 00:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Drewniana_architektura_w_Irkucku_36.JPG
[edit]- Nomination The wooden house. Irkutsk, Russia. --Halavar 20:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose In my opinion, in this image, horizontal lines must be stright.
PincushionBarrel distortion IMO (see notes): I'm not sure -Lmbuga 02:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Lake railway station MMB 03 483007.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 483007 departs Lake. Mattbuck 10:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- IMO, the angle is not very good. I find that it would be better if it were shot something like this. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- QIC not FPC :) I see no quality issues. Probably the top of the train could be slightly sharper. Let's discuss. --Tuxyso 16:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's a single track line, there is only one platform, your idea (I assume you want concave rather than convex) would be impossible AK. Mattbuck 23:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- QIC not FPC :) I see no quality issues. Probably the top of the train could be slightly sharper. Let's discuss. --Tuxyso 16:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but DoF issue, too much part of the image is unsharp IMO Christian Ferrer 07:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Сип_белоголовый.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) in the zoo, Rostov-on-don, Russia. --Zhanett.b 05:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 17:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Good, but with large size the picture has a little white border above and to the right--Lmbuga 00:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose: Definitely needs the white borders removed before it can be promoted to QI.I'll be happy to reverse my vote once it has been fixed, as the image is otherwise of excellent quality. --DAJF 09:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)- Support Very good now. Maybe DAJF and Lmbuga could have another look ?--Jebulon 14:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Indeed, good --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support A comment is not a vote, please. Good now--Lmbuga 11:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Looks good now. Definitely a quality image. --DAJF 01:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Łódź_na_Bajkale_w_Listwiance.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Boat on Lake Baikal. Listvyanka, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 23:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Hermosa iluminación, colores y reflejo. --Ivan2010 14:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose poor sharpness --A.Savin 19:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Info Added sharpness. --Halavar 01:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sharpening doesn't improve detail. If the detail is poor (e.g. due to poor focusing, or motion blur), it remains poor. --A.Savin 10:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Sharpness is OK with me, but imo white balance is not correct (green cast). Also it has CCW tilt (the line between an object and its reflection should be vertical). --Iifar 18:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Improvable--Lmbuga 04:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Too softened (denoising too strong, IMO.) --Jebulon 14:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Храм_Армянской_Апостольской_церкви_Святого_Вардана_Мамиконяна_городе_Кисловодске.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Armenian Apostolic Church of St. Vardan Mamikonyan in the city of Kislovodsk, Stavropol region, Russia. --Zhanett.b 13:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Support Interesante composicion e iluminacion. --Ivan2010 15:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose insufficient quality, perspective distortions --A.Savin 20:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: Needs perspective adjustment. --DAJF 09:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Hormuzakia-aggregata-Wikipedia-001i.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hormuzakia aggregata. --MathKnight 21:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Cayambe 10:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The focus is not on any of the flowers. --Uoaei1 19:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, F:4 is not the better to this kind of pictures. Oversharpened: the oversharpened (IMO) background is disturbing (artifacts). Probably noise--Lmbuga 20:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: The plant/flower blends too much into the background. Sorry, but I don't think this is quite QI material. --DAJF 09:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
File:14-02-04-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-161.jpg
[edit]- Nomination European Parliament, Strasbourg --Ralf Roletschek 12:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Nice imo when two slight stiching errors are fixed (see note, please). --JLPC 18:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC) OK, its fixed. --Ralf Roletschek 08:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Sorry, but it's not very sharp, and the perspective at the edges makes me feel seasick. --Mattbuck 18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
I disagree - let it discuss. --~~~~ - Support Looks good to me. --DAJF 01:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry faces. As Mattbuck--Lmbuga 04:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry. Tilted (See the flag).--Jebulon 14:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Kaisergebirge_von_Aschau_im_Winter_01.JPG
[edit]- Nomination: Kaiser Mountains (Tyrol, Austria) --Uoaei1 20:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Review Not in focus. --Mattbuck 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Changed to discussion by Uoaeil1. Mattbuck 23:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Right, I would like to ask for more opinions. --Uoaei1 09:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC) - Support Good enough, very nice composition --Moroder 10:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Too much bland sky (composition, rule of thirds)--Lmbuga 20:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Changed the crop and format changed accordingly --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC) - Neutral The dark trees are in focus IMO (is suitable?, perhaps it's not). I see other problem, the left area of the image is blurry because the focus is on right. Hearing other users, I can change my vote--Lmbuga 12:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --A.Savin 23:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Chichibu-railway-7001-20090505.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: A Chichibu Railway 7000 series EMU train in Japan (by LERK) --DAJF 05:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose - Too noisy and the sky is a bit too bright IMO --Poco a poco 07:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support - It looks OK to me, so I would like to ask for a third opinion. --DAJF 23:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support - The sky is bright, but it doesn't appear to be overexposed. I see no noise problems. Mattbuck 21:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --A.Savin 23:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Rösrath-Denkmal-92_Hauptstrasse-104_Turbinenanlage.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Housing of the Fontaine water turbine, a listed monument in Rösrath, Germany --Cccefalon 17:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The dark shadow on the building is disturbing and I think some reviewers could be in trouble to judge the German description --Moroder 13:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It's not actually overexposed, but that white wall does appear to be glowing. Mattbuck 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I added an english description. But actually, I think both other comments are not really helpful. I ask for another opinion. Thank you. --Cccefalon 09:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Unfortunately spoiled by the high contrast between the shadow on the left and the almost blown-out white wall. --DAJF 07:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Acceptable. Though the white wall is near clipping, it is not really disturbing. --Smial 15:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with DAJF.--Jebulon 14:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)