Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 24 2023

• 
  • Nomination Restoration Prinses Margriettunnel During the work, the tunnel sections are temporarily held in place by 10,000 Big Bags filled with sand.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Alde Feans. Reformed Church, Earnewald.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital of the portal of the church of Pieta in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Casa Besalú in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower of the Casa de la Ciutat in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Casa Moixó in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural Function in Dhaka University --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cherry Blossom in High Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raccoon --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset from Ontario Place --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West Eglintion Station (TTC) --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Late baroque portal of the rectory on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix at the cemetery on Oberer Kirchenweg #10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porch at the parish church holy Mary Rosary Queen on Oberer Kirchenweg 10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mortuary at the cemetery on Oberer Kirchenweg 10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buddha statue (detail, right side), Sani Lake, Zanskar, Ladakh, India --Tagooty 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Prayer flags fluttering in the wind, Buddha statue, Sani Lake, Zanskar --Tagooty 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traffic on NH301 heading SE from Sani towards Padum, Zanskar --Tagooty 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stakrimo Gompa (centre), Padum valley (right), Zanskar, Ladakh, India --Tagooty 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hikers walking towards Padum from the east, Zanskar --Tagooty 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Towboat Covington maneuvering to dock. --GuavaTrain 00:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motorsports, IDM, Hockenheimring: Walid Khan (NED), IDM Supersport 300. By --Stepro 20:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mille Miglia 2023, second leg, Cervia Air Base - Fiat 500 Sport (1949) driven by Alessandro Cassina and Matteo Oberto. --Gio Terra 19:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Cool. --Stepro 20:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade East --PaestumPaestum 18:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fitjar nursery home. --Vasmar1 18:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Larus Canus in Fitjar. --Vasmar1 18:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose not that good a pov --Charlesjsharp 18:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Millennium Milepost MP956X, Bute Park, Cardiff --BigDom 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Lakes bulk carrier, CSL ST-LAURENT, in the Welland Canal at St. Catharines, Canada --GRDN711 15:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Castle in Poznań --Jakubhal 15:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 16:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing basking position of Tagiades litigiosa (Möschler, 1878) - Water Snow Flat (4) WLB --Anitava Roy 14:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --BigDom 17:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing Basking of Lethe europa (Fabricius, 1775) - Bamboo Treebrown (4) WLB --Anitava Roy 14:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
    is this a natural background please? --Charlesjsharp 18:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose artifical background --Charlesjsharp 18:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing Basking of Neptis jumbah (Moore, 1858) - Chestnut-streaked Sailer (2) WLB --Anitava Roy 14:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose this looks like an artificial background --Charlesjsharp 18:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carpets at the Carnot market at en:Saint-Étienne, France. --Touam 12:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 15:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 15:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 15:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 15:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orchid flower at Foodhall Plaza Indonesia --Vitaium 12:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Artifacts, lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coetiroedd Nant Fawr Woodlands, Cardiff --BigDom 11:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 14:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia Stonic at IAA 2017, Frankfurt --MB-one 09:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panasonic Astrova IFE on display at Aircraft Interiors Expo 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 09:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bongo (tragelaphus eurycerus) horns in Kakum National Park --MB-one 09:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the river Regnitz near Seußling, aerial photo --Ermell 08:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 09:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Regnitz and the Main-Danube Canal near Seußling, aerial photo --Ermell 08:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge over the river Regnitz in Seußling, aerial view --Ermell 08:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 08:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz S-Class in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 08:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but looks like a V223 (not W223) to me. --MB-one 15:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boiler room of the former Peignage de la Tossée, in Tourcoing, France --Velvet 06:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a Great Scallop, Pecten maximus --Llez 05:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Radomianin 07:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Anebos Castle to the Trifels Castle --Llez 05:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A character of Indian mythology drama. (by TAPAS KUMAR HALDER) --Radomianin 23:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Will be useful to add the location/theatre. --Tagooty 03:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment Many thanks for pointing it out, it's indeed a minus. My only clue is the upload history of the author, it could be the state of West Bengal. Best, -- Radomianin 08:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citroën e-C4 X at Esslinger Frühling 2023.--Alexander-93 14:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --BigDom 17:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le val de Nendaz vu depuis le château de la Soie. --Espandero 11:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion noise could be reduced in the sky. Sharp and overall good quality. --Milseburg 16:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Anebos Castle to the Trifels Castle --Llez 05:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naked woman in an apparently abandoned hanger in Eberswalde, GermanyI. By User:Marcela --Edu1997 12:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose User:Edu1997, please read the criteria. Images are required to have more than 2 million pixels --痛 20:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mediterranean moray (Muraena helena), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 07:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination - natural reserve of Calafuria.--Anna.Massini 07:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Helical Stepped Well Plaque. Snehrashmi 03:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: City Gate Plaque. Snehrashmi 03:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dadabhai Naoroji Bust. Snehrashmi 03:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dowlat Vilas Palace gate. Snehrashmi 03:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial photo of Vytautas the Great War Museum in Kaunas, Lithuania. (by BigHead) --Pofka 20:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial photo of Vilnius Town Hall Square. (by BigHead) --Pofka 20:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial photo of Kaunas Old Town. (by BigHead) --Pofka 20:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nymphaeaceae in Hillevatnet, Austevoll. --Vasmar1 18:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Soyuz TMA-6 at the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 16:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Soyuz TMA-6 at the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 16:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Beechcraft T-34 Mentor at the Intrepid Museum --Mike Peel 16:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aermacchi MB-339 at Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 16:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chapel n° 5 "Jesus on the cross" on the path of the "painful mysteries" rosary at Trois-Épis (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chapel n° 3 "Pentecost" on the path of the "glorious mysteries" rosary at Trois-Épis (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Boat lift 4 on the canal du Centre in Belgium. --Jmh2o 16:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --痛 02:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A north view of Fed Square, Melbourne --DXR 06:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 14:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The lake 'Pfälzerwoog' in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany --Stephan Sprinz 14:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    I don't find anything in good focus. Perhaps smaller aperture needed? --Tagooty 02:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spotted Owlet in Patiala --Satdeep Gill 13:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    nice shot - but it could be sharper --MVmath20 17:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
    @MVmath20:  Done Can you review again? --Satdeep Gill 11:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
    Sharpness is borderline ok now, the eye is in focus. Please add a CAT for the location. --Tagooty 02:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Pietà on a grave --Romainbehar 19:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs a better Summary/Description including the location. --Tagooty 02:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Not done. --Vasmar1 18:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Teddy bear --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion The image is too bright, especially not enough contrast between the feet and the background -- Spurzem 11:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)@Spurzem: Fixed--Jacek Halicki 08:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
     Support ok --Sandro Halank 16:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:20170818_Friedhof_von_Maimara.jpg

• Nomination Cementerio de Maimara--MVmath20 21:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Needs a perspective correction, oversaturated sky --Grunpfnul 19:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
  
• New version with perspective and sky correction is uploaded  Done--MVmath20 16:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Not sharp to me or overprocessed. Sebring12Hrs
•  Oppose Seems very oversharpened to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversharpened --Jakubhal 04:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but this is not a QI --Sandro Halank 16:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Sandro Halank 16:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Münster,_LVM,_Korkfigur_--_2023_--_062528.jpg

• Nomination Cork figure at LVM insurance in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but not the usual XRay quality - cellphone image with lack of details --Uoaei1 19:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

• If you only have a cellphone with you, this is a solution. As a QI, the picture is good enough in my opinion, but certainly not more. --XRay 05:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality - neither the photographer, nor the camera should really be a reason for promoting or declining an image, we should always look at the quality of the image in question. And I see sufficient quality for a QI here. --Kritzolina 10:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. The photo is "good enough" for an A4 print. Exposure, colours, lighting, composition are ok. However, these ever-advancing internal "optimizations" used in these smartphone noise generators seem to me to make it increasingly difficult to distinguish what is real and what is not in the photos shown. While the more or less successful noise reduction measures are still relatively easy to recognize for homogeneous background surfaces outside the depth of field, it is now difficult to do so for structured surfaces. Is it marble or even plastic with noise artifacts? Or is it light granite, which should just look so grainy? It is often no longer possible to distinguish between the two, unless you take a forensic approach and look for clues at the pixel level. --Smial 12:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version
•  Support per Smial --Sandro Halank 05:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per Smial --Jakubhal 04:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Cigogne_blanche_et_juvénile_(Ciconia_ciconia)_(4).jpg

• Nomination: White Stork and juvenile (Ciconia ciconia) in Cernay (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 09:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 11:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
   Oppose too dark --Charlesjsharp 09:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Strong shadows, but the parent and child that are the subjects of the photo are clearly depicted. -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment. Unfortunate lighting. Perhaps it could be improved. The presented version is no QI for me. -- Spurzem 11:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I must agree to Spurzem. Though the composition is very nice, colours and sharpness are fine, there are burnt areas, and loss of detail in essential areas due to extreme high contrast. --Smial 12:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Ikan Kekek --Sandro Halank 05:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose by Charlesjsharp --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The object is well outlined--Moroder 18:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Smial and Spurzem --Jakubhal 04:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta interno 2023 Manerba del Garda.jpg

• Nomination: Interior of Manerba's Assunta church --Moroder 13:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
• Review  Oppose Center is sharp enough, but unfortunately the borders are blurred --PantheraLeo1359531 16:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Fotos with no blurred parts don’t exist--Moroder 20:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
    •  Question Could these be stitching errors? Especially on the right edge of the image, there are some double contours that, if it were motion blur, should actually appear everywhere in the image. But they do not. I'm at a bit of a loss as to how they came about. Because of the high image resolution, the quality is still sufficient for a print in A4 size and for me the photo would therefore actually count as QI. But it is a bit disappointing and somehow unsatisfactory for an image with well over 100 MPixels. --Smial 10:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
      • It depends. I sometimes have blurred/shaked areas in the corner in my images. Other images are fine. These effects might differ from camera model and lens to other models. If the image border areas can be corrected, then it is a pro for me --PantheraLeo1359531 13:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
        •  Comment Thanks for your comments. This is not a stitched image. I insist that, if you have a object which is deep like this church and not flat, you cannot have parts of the image which are not blurred, specially if you have to work with a high aperture f/4.0 because of the little light. This is one of the first shots with my new camera, which has image stabilization and I bought it to work in churches and museums where tripods are generally forbidden. Imho quality here is very high and beyond my expectations, considering the object and the working conditions. --Moroder 16:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
          • Yeah it is really a pity. For me, it seems like it looks like camera shakes with a direction to the corners near the image borders. I would recommend taking two example images in a room, one taken per hand and one taken with a tripod. Then we can examine more where the blurred areas come from. Sometimes even very small hand shakes lead to this blurred parts (I have it sometimes). I think f/4 is enough as aperture here and I think the unsharp areas would look different. I assume it is some sort of camera shake and/or poor coverage of the lens in border areas --PantheraLeo1359531 13:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
            • Sorry but I think it’s neither camera shake, which you’d see all over the picture, neither a problem of a 3000 $ lens but simply a matter of DOF, cheers--Moroder 14:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support My personal conclusion from what has been said and assumed is that there are several factors at work here. The anti-shake mechanism has reached its limits, there is also a slight edge blur and the usual effects of subsequent perspective corrections. All together this causes the somewhat unbalanced sharpness impression when using the full sensor resolution. Despite the shortcomings, the image is usable for pictures well over A4 size, has natural colors in my opinion and the contrasts are also well managed. Overall, this is enough for me for a pro. @Mododer: I find comments about the price of photographic equipment counterproductive. There is photographic equipment that is quite expensive, and when used wisely, delivers excellent results, but like this 50 MPixels Canon DSLR, for example, has terrible quality at high ISO settings. Every instrument has its limits, no matter how expensive. One shouldn't try to shoot down obviously factual arguments by referring to the expensive equipment. That poisons the discussion climate. (Conversely, this also applies to devaluing photos from phones just because they are phones. Under favorable circumstances, they take "good enough" pictures.)-- Smial 14:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)