Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 24 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Via_della_Luce_37_in_Rome_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Via della Luce 37 in Rome (by Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The perspective looks strange, sorry. --Nefronus 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Imo it is QI. “Strange” is not a criterion to evaluate an image --Moroder 02:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment To be more specific, the verticals on the right buildings seem to lean towards the top right corner + the top of the main buiding looks convex to me. --Nefronus 05:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I you check it thoroughly, each floor in reality is a little bit offset in respect to the inferior floor --Moroder 09:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks normal enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 16:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:GR129_in_Thuin_(DSC_0158).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination GR129 / GR12 walking path in Thuin, Belgium (near Ruisseau de l'Ermitage) --Trougnouf 21:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Nice photo, but there are pixel-wide lines around the overexposed areas. Can you correct that? --Nefronus 23:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
    I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about :s Is it something you can add a note of on the image? --Trougnouf 08:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
    I added a note. It might be pixel-peeping, but on the other hand it seems quite strange. --Nefronus 14:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
    ✓ Done I think it's fixed :) Somehow amaze demosaicing results in these little vertical edges, they're gone (or at least not black) with VNG4 and color smoothing. --Trougnouf 15:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but there are still some strange pixels around the sun & the detail got more noisy and undefined… --Nefronus 07:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    I think the quality is good at reasonable size and that it's a reasonable expectation that looking too close into the sun results in artifacts. --Trougnouf 00:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)