Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 19 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:13_Strada_Arthur_Verona,_Bucharest_(05).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 13 Strada Arthur Verona, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 05:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose perspective distortion and level of detail is too low. --Augustgeyler 22:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Completely normal view and perspective to me, but I agree that the details are not as clear as I think they should be for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. O.K. I can't read the titles of the books on the shelves either. Still, I don't want to say that the picture lacks details. I find it sufficient for QI. I especially like the light. -- Spurzem 11:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. Photos taken from such a perspective should not be forcefully verticalized. Often the result looks absurd. --Smial 12:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)