Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 06 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Veitenstein_Haßberge_0325-PSD.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from Veitenstein in the nature park Haßberge --Ermell 08:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality, nice scene -- George Chernilevsky 08:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree I think HDR highlights are too strong and seem gray. --MirandaAdramin 09:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Solid QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan. --Basotxerri 07:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Question Hi Ermell, is this an HDR or is this simply using the whole dynamic range of your camera? I'm only curious about it... --Basotxerri 07:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
    • It is a three picture tone-mapped HDR with photoshop post processing.--Ermell 13:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

File:2016-11-01_Borner_See,_Gans_(02)_(freddy2001).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Eine Gans am Borner See --Freddy2001 12:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The birds is not sharp. Charlesjsharp 19:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. The bird is not in flight and it should be easier to get a sharp photo.--Peulle 17:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Saint Saturnin Church of Tourbes 01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Saturnin Church of Tourbes, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 19:25, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strange parallelism on the vertical lines... --MirandaAdramin 21:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
@MirandaAdramin: sorry, but I don't understand... strange parallelism? Tournasol7 22:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
@Tournasol7: Sorry, I only wanted to comment. The vertical lines appear to move upward... As if the perspective was reversed. I wondered if you used a distorsion tool.--MirandaAdramin 12:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment When I checked the image, I saw that the left side of the tower isn't totally vertical. However I presume that it is a property of the building and it's not 100% vertical in reality. --Basotxerri 16:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 17:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC))

File:Menu_du_jour_d'un_restaurant_asiatique_lyonnais_en_2017.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Menu du jour du restaurant Rizpai 255 Cours Lafayette, 69006 Lyon, le 30 mai 2017. --Benoît Prieur 15:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support I get hungry... --Llez 16:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, it may be good enough, but please fix perspective. Please have a look to the lower left corner. --XRay 16:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you. OK now. --XRay 05:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per XRay. The remnants lower left need fixing.--Peulle 11:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 07:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 Support Yes, it's been fixed now. --Peulle 13:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Neuhaus_Weiher_Blässhühner_P5RM1878-PSD.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Coot feeding her chick --Ermell 08:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose birds not in focus. Charlesjsharp 21:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp.--Peulle 11:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charles, the heads are too unsharp. --Basotxerri 07:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)