Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 26 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hymenocallis_littoralis_among_reed_2.jpg

[edit]

@Peulle: Per User:W.carter - "such big, spidery flowers, I don't think it's necessary to have all of it in frame and focus". It is a spider-lily, not a rose. --GerifalteDelSabana 00:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not a good argument, IMO, as there is plenty of room top and right.--Peulle 10:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hymenocallis_littoralis_among_reed_1.jpg

[edit]

File:2018-02-03_Junior_World_Championships_Luge_Altenberg_2018_–_Team_by_Sandro_Halank–13.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 33rd Junior World Championship Luge, Altenberg 2018 – Team: Anna Smirnova (KAZ) --Sandro Halank 15:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The bottom crop is really unfortunate --Poco a poco 15:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't mind the crop. The feet of that lady are not essential for this kind of "portrait". Otherwise good.
    The vote above shouldn't be valid as long as not identified Poco a poco 21:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 08:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment You know all of these images are tilted, right? Do we think that's a problem?--Peulle 11:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Wikimania_2018,_Cape_Town_(_1050602).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination African penguin on Boulders Beach, Cape Town --MB-one 08:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Inadequate description on image page. Too wide crop. Johannes Robalotoff 12:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  • @Johannes Robalotoff: thanks for the comment. Fixed the description, disagree with the crop assessment. --MB-one 01:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral OK, as the framing is a matter of taste and the penguin is detailed and sharp, I am neutral now. Johannes Robalotoff 15:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --GerifalteDelSabana 05:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment MB-one, could you please fix the vignetting? I realized that now Poco a poco 21:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Fixed the vignetting. Wonder why it wasn't fixed automatically. --MB-one 01:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 10:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Pond_Heron_Safari_Park.jpg

[edit]

  •  Oppose Didn't notice the lack of a good description/cat. --GerifalteDelSabana 05:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but not a QI like this, you'll have to find out the species ID and improve description+category --Poco a poco 14:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good photo, but bad description and category. Please fix this and I will support in spite of some visible noise. Johannes Robalotoff 11:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As it is, no. Too much noise, CA around the beak and insufficient categorization and description.--Peulle 12:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment Where do you see (significant) CA? I think the slight purple fringe at the bird's beak could be part of its real color. Johannes Robalotoff 13:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
That could very well be the case.--Peulle 01:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
@Peulle and Johannes Robalotoff: Johannes is correct, the 'CA' is part of the outer rostrum coloration. I'm also ascertained (based on the plumage) that this particular bird is of the species Ardeola grayii, or an Indian Pond Heron. --GerifalteDelSabana 05:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC).
  •  Comment If species is given and rare maybe a valuable image. --GPSLeo 20:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)--Peulle 12:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

File:தேன் தட்டான் - Ditch Jewel Dragonfly.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Dragonfly resting on a branch--Sathya K Selvam 04:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 06:52, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. It is sharp enough to see individual veins and some hair, so I feel that it is good enough for the type of shot. --GerifalteDelSabana 03:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell --Sandro Halank 11:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to many unsharp areas, --Fischer.H 15:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The DoF is too shallow.--Peulle 12:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support The important areas are sharp. --GPSLeo 20:42, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)