Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 11 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Intérieur_de_la_Basilique_Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré,_Quebéc,_Canada.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Interieur Basilique --Wilfredor 14:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry the photo is beautiful, but pretty noisy --Jakubhal 17:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
    I think this little noise is not enough to cover up the beauty. --Q28 01:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's a very large file, so I'm not sure, but Q28, if you're going to object to an opposing vote and move the nomination to Consensual Review, why don't you support? -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I think the first impression of noise is just because it is so big. Look at it with width 1536. --Watchduck 09:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Noisy,Sorry --Wikibusters (talk) 14:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry: Perspective distortion perspective distortion and disturbing luminance noise . --F. Riedelio 07:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Sarahan-Bhimakali-04-gje.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bhimakali temple, Sarahan by Gerd Eichmann --UnpetitproleX 08:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too low detail, sorry --Poco a poco 08:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
     Support. Perhaps a bit oversaturated colors but QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This looks like overdone, blurring noise reduction to me. --Smial 15:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco a poco --Jakubhal 06:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

==

[edit]
  • Nomination Murals of dinosaurs at Changhua County Wanxing Elementary School By User:條文狗 --Q28 08:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality, but why don't other people's comment? --Q28 04:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Vote canceled. The nominator has no vote. --Milseburg 11:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment That's correct. I didn't notice that the nominator was trying to support their own nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 22:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe because we couldn't decide. You could have instead made the status "Promotion" and asked for a second (maybe third) opinion if anyone had one. Not everything has to go into Consensual Review. -- Ikan Kekek 09:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unvavorable crop. --Milseburg 11:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry: Disturbances at the top and right edge of the image . --F. Riedelio 07:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
    • @Milseburg, F. Riedelio, and Ikan Kekek: I just uploaded the new version, using a different file name, and put it on the nominate page for today.--Q28 05:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)